Steve, thanks for mentioning that it happens only at the first start. I
didn't try it a second time!
--
bzr vis exception org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited: Launch helper
exited with unknown return code 0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332050
You received this bug notification becaus
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16667495/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16667496/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16667498/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Unfortunately I can't reproduce this problem. I thought the backtrace is
included in those apport-files?
--
gcalctool crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256259
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16573219/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16573220/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16573221/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Since easytag worked for some time and it doesn't anymore (the above
crash is reproducible with different albums, .mp3, .ogg, .flac alike) i
experimented a little and found out that it doesn't happen anymore, when
i delete my ~/.easytag directory.
I have a backup of the problematic ~/.easytag. If
I can confirm this bug in Ubuntu 8.04.2 LTS
This bug is nasty, because you wont find this bug report before you figured out
the root of the problem yourself. That should be another reason to fix this
bug. Since i'm not able to fix it, i will use the following workaround:
* use pvdisplay to deter
I'm certain that this is Bug #282189. I will mark this bug as a
duplicate.
--
When root volume is in LVM over two encrypted partitions, only one is decrypted
at startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290115
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
I just saw that this bug would be hidden from the default bug listing
when searching, so i won't mark is as a duplicate, since this bug is
much easier to find than the other one since it says something about the
symptoms, not the cause.
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
Tony, i tried that, but it is not possible to specify how many extents
to move. I tried pvmove, Ctrl+C, pvmove --abort but this reverts the
move unless there was already a lot of data moved.
--
"dmsetup deps" does not accurately report LVM dependencies, can cause boot
failure
https://bugs.launch
Public bug reported:
I can't give much more information, i decided to let apport report the
problem this time. If you have any questions about the hardware, i can
answer them, but i think you can see all information in lspci.
BTW: suspend/resume also doesn't work if i don't use the nvidia binary
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25627156/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25627157/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25627158/Dependencies.txt
** A
i can confirm this problem. i'll attach the log.
--
Upgrade to 2.0.3-6dapper1 fails
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58798
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I can confirm Ryan's problem with 2.0.3-6dapper2
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
Upgrade to 2.0.3-6dapper1 fails
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58798
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
2.0.3-6dapper3 worked for me as well. but when i marked the packages for
upgrade, synaptic resisted on removing the ubuntu-desktop meta-package.
reinstalling ubuntu-desktop afterwards worked (without (de-)installation
of any dependencies).
--
[2.0.3. dapper only] Upgrade to 2.0.3-6dapper1 fails
h
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 83172 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83172
@john
i use the following workaround. when jigdo got all the files that are still
available i rename the .iso.tmp to .iso and i download the .torrent.
then i start btdownloadcurses.bittornado ubuntu-xxx.torren
Yes it's still an issue. And it's the same for Ubuntu 6.10, 7.04, 7.10, 8.04.
If i want to have several installs of Ubuntu on the same machine, I have to fix
menu.lst after every install and every kernel-upgrade.
--
wrong partition for "boot=" in grub.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/41925
Y
Confirmed with Gutsy final, alternate CD.
--
installer hangs with encryption and random password
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
I want to confirm this bug.
I tried to install feisty-final off the alternate-i386-cd and the
installer stopped with an error when installing grub. On another console
i saw the following error:
---
grub-installer: info: Installing grub on '(hd0)'
...
/dev/sdas1 does not have any corre
Sorry for not opening a new bug. I will do so next time. It's just too
hard to recognize what belongs together (same cause) or just looks the
same (same symptoms). Please understand: I'm supposed to search for
existing bugs (and add to those) to not produce unnecessary duplicates
and on the other h
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala BETA
At the very end of the installation process, the installer asks, if the
computers clock is set to UTC. If you answer "No" the installer still
interprets the current system time (which originally comes from t
Regarding Stefans comment: please also look at Bug #440281 which was
marked as a duplicate of this bug, but I believe it isn't.
--
superblock last write time is in the future
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 268808 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268808
Thanks for looking at this report!
Although I don't know for sure, I doubt that this really is a duplicate of Bug
#268808. The reasons:
First, the author of the bug description is in a time-zone UTC-X, I'm i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 268808 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268808
> Feel free to unmark it.
Ähem, yes, I would have, but I don't know how to.
> I guess the main problem is that the time should be initialized before
fsck runs.
Agreed. But that's the other bug. Here the tim
I can confirm this bug with the installer of Karmic Koala Beta, 64 bit,
alternate cd.
These are my partition tables, they seem to be perfectly OK:
r...@hardy64:~# fdisk -l /dev/sd?
Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 160
Since I will change my partition table now for further experimenting I
attach the raw partition table as given by fdisk for reference.
** Attachment added: "sda_raw.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32957766/sda_raw.txt
--
Karmic Beta: disk partitions not shown in installer.
https://bugs.lau
Hello Andres,
I wanted to reproduce this problem today with Karmic Beta but unfortunately
(Bug #365944) I was not able to install Karmic on my Computer. I tried with a
Live-CD-image on USB-stick though and resume didn't work. But of course that
information is no help in fixing this problem. I do
** Package changed: debian-installer (Ubuntu) => partman-partitioning
(Ubuntu)
--
Karmic Beta: disk partitions not shown in installer.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
The method described in Post #28 doesn't work for me, the method in Post
#14 does. I'm using Ubuntu Maverick 10.10 x64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176125
Title:
Ubuntu should acti
I can confirm this bug as described by the original poster on Lucid
final with a Huawei E1550 boght from bob in Austria.
--
Huawei E1550 / E620 unable to connect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561821
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
29 matches
Mail list logo
