[Bug 330811] Re: Can't connect to a hidden network

2009-04-24 Thread cAbLe
Hi: I am also having problems. My SSID was not hidden, and anyways, I couldnt connect. First, I configure my Wifi network in the network manager and I set the pass there. In the plasma menu, it asks me again for pass, no idea why. After that, it tells me that the connection failed. I use WPA-P

[Bug 64326] Re: beagled-helper loads CPU

2006-11-05 Thread Cable
I also have this problem. Works fine when the computer starts, but CPU load goes up to 100% after being idle for a few minutes. -- beagled-helper loads CPU https://launchpad.net/bugs/64326 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu

[Bug 146878] Re: Gutsy Install Does Not Detect Windows XP for Dual Boot

2007-10-12 Thread Cable
I also tried installing Gutsy again using the Release Candidate LiveCD. It worked perfectly and GRUB is set up with both Ubuntu and Windows as choices. Looks like the problem is fixed. :-) -- Gutsy Install Does Not Detect Windows XP for Dual Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146878 You recei

[Bug 146878] Alternate CD Does Not Detect Windows XP for Dual Boot

2007-09-29 Thread Cable
Public bug reported: I installed Gutsy Beta using the Alternate CD. It installed fine, but did not detect that I have Windows XP installed and therefore did not set up GRUB to give me the choice to boot into Ubuntu or Windows XP. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Bug 146878] Re: Gutsy Install Does Not Detect Windows XP for Dual Boot

2007-10-01 Thread Cable
** Summary changed: - Alternate CD Does Not Detect Windows XP for Dual Boot + Gutsy Install Does Not Detect Windows XP for Dual Boot -- Gutsy Install Does Not Detect Windows XP for Dual Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146878 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 146878] Re: Gutsy Install Does Not Detect Windows XP for Dual Boot

2007-10-01 Thread Cable
I have my disks divided into several partitions. Following is the output of the above command. Disk /dev/sda: 200.0 GB, 200049647616 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24321 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System

[Bug 67487] Re: Install 6:10 Failure: Black screen at Live Desktop Stage

2006-11-01 Thread Cable
I experience this issue as well. I have an AGP 9800 XT. Both Dapper and Edgy LiveCD's would not work for me whether it was using the default start option or the safe graphics mode. -- Install 6:10 Failure: Black screen at Live Desktop Stage https://launchpad.net/bugs/67487 -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 471728] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 suspend_test_finish+0x80/0x90()

2009-11-02 Thread cable
Public bug reported: Linux tim-laptop 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux bash: cat/proc/version_signature: 没有该文件或目录 ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 AudioDevices

[Bug 471728] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 suspend_test_finish+0x80/0x90()

2009-11-02 Thread cable
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34985809/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34985810/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34985811/ArecordDevices.t

[Bug 369605] [NEW] Myenvelopes not working

2009-04-29 Thread Donald Cable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Just upgraded to Ubunto 9.04 - the Jaunty Jackalope. Since then I have been unable to open Myenvelops at crown.org - it's a budget system. Youtube videos work intermittently and my daughter can not access her music at www.playlist.com. Proble

[Bug 369605] Re: Myenvelopes not working

2009-04-29 Thread Donald Cable
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26161842/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26161843/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26161844/profiles

[Bug 530353] [NEW] Machine with 2+ interfaces will only respond to pings from same subnet

2010-03-01 Thread Patrick Cable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-server a VMware Virtual Machine: r...@svc1:~# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 r...@svc1:~# uname -a Linux svc1 2.6.31-19-server #56-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 28 03:40:48 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux r...@svc1:~# apt-cache

[Bug 530353] Re: Machine with 2+ interfaces will only respond to pings from same subnet

2010-03-01 Thread Patrick Cable
Some more notes: r...@svc1:~# netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.67.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.62.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0

[Bug 462588] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6474e550 (Hauppauge hdpvr when power cycled)

2009-10-28 Thread Loose Cable
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34538739/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34538740/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34538741/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 462588] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6474e550 (Hauppauge hdpvr when power cycled)

2009-10-28 Thread Loose Cable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-generic-pae This happens when I power cycle one of the Hauppauge HD-PVR devices connected to the PCI USB controller card. Noob, first bug report. Linux SageTV-Server 2.6.31-14-generic-pae #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 15:22:42 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-05-12 Thread Patrick Cable
Question: Is there a process by which to get this fix into Trusty as well? The code diff is the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575877 Title: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-05-17 Thread Patrick Cable
I've created a debdiff for patching Trusty for this bug. ** Patch added: "apt-trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1575877/+attachment/4664905/+files/apt-trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-05-17 Thread Patrick Cable
I've also created a debdiff for patching Precise for this bug. ** Patch added: "apt-precise.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1575877/+attachment/4664911/+files/apt-precise.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1580952] Re: [SRU] Update apt/xenial to 1.2.12

2016-05-17 Thread Patrick Cable
I've tested the patch and it seems to work, btw. (for the no_proxy stuff) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580952 Title: [SRU] Update apt/xenial to 1.2.12 To manage notifications abou

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-05-17 Thread Patrick Cable
I can toss together one for Wily tomorrow; I figured keeping unreleased in the changelog was important for debdiffs that hadn't been accepted yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575877

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-05-18 Thread Patrick Cable
Precise: tested failure condition, added -proposed repo, updated apt and retested -- all good. Trusty: tested failure condition, added -proposed repo, updated apt and retested -- all good. Xenial: tested failure condition, added -proposed repo, updated apt and retested -- all good. Not sure ho

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-05-18 Thread Patrick Cable
Here's a debdiff for fixing Wily. ** Patch added: "apt-wily.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1575877/+attachment/4665539/+files/apt-wily.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-05-24 Thread Patrick Cable
Just tested in Wily -- replicated failure condition, added -proposed repo, updated apt and retested and it's all good. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575877 Title: no_proxy i

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-05-02 Thread Patrick Cable
Sure thing. SRU to follow: [Impact] This bug breaks users who use a proxy to access externally-hosted https apt repositories, but do not need to use a proxy to access internally hosted https apt repositories. Specifically, if a user has a https_proxy (or http_proxy and no https_proxy) setting

[Bug 1575877] [NEW] no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-04-27 Thread Patrick Cable
Public bug reported: Description: When using the https transport mechanism, $no_proxy is ignored if apt is getting it's proxy information from $https_proxy. If the source of proxy information is Acquire::https::Proxy set in apt.conf (or apt.conf.d), then $no_proxy is honored. Package Versions:

[Bug 1575877] Re: no_proxy ignored if https_proxy set

2016-04-27 Thread Patrick Cable
Updated the patch with the help of the debian-apt upstream. ** Patch added: "0001-refactored-no_proxy-code-to-work-regardless-of-where.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1575877/+attachment/4649568/+files/0001-refactored-no_proxy-code-to-work-regardless-of-where.patch

[Bug 530353] Re: Machine with 2+ interfaces will only respond to pings from same subnet

2010-07-23 Thread Patrick Cable
Setting net.ipv4.conf.*.rp_filter to 0 fixed this issue. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Machine with 2+ interfaces will only respond to pings from same subnet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 2106696] [NEW] FTBFS on Xenial

2025-04-09 Thread Bruce Cable
Public bug reported: When attempting to build from source on Xenial get the following failure: debian/start_mysqld_and_auto_install.sh mysql_install_db: [ERROR] unknown option '--force' 2025-03-25 20:14:19 [ERROR] Unrecognized options debian/rules:19: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_install

[Bug 2107365] [NEW] FTBFS on Focal and Xenial

2025-04-14 Thread Bruce Cable
Public bug reported: When attempting to build the package the following errors are produced for Focal and Xenial respectively: ../CImg.h:413:10: fatal error: cv.h: No such file or directory 413 | #include "cv.h" ! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! ** Affects: cimg (Ubu

[Bug 2115164] [NEW] Focal FTBFS due to Failing Tests

2025-06-23 Thread Bruce Cable
Public bug reported: The following tests fail during the build process resulting in a failed build: certstor_system: System Certificate Store - Find Certificate by SHA1(pubkey) ran 2 tests in 0.00 msec 1 FAILED Failure 1: found certificate was null System Certificate Store - Find Certificate by

[Bug 2119080] Re: why openjdk-11 in ubuntu pro?

2025-07-29 Thread Bruce Cable
Apologies for this mistake, I've released openjdk-lts 24.04 to the archive. It should be available in the next few hours. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119080 Title: why openjdk-11

[Bug 2119080] Re: why openjdk-11 in ubuntu pro?

2025-07-30 Thread Bruce Cable
** Changed in: openjdk-11 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119080 Title: why openjdk-11 in ubuntu pro? To manage notifications about this b