[Bug 557291] [NEW] error: /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.so: undefined symbol: krb5_cc_retrieve_cred

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sssd Seems that sssd needs to be rebuilt or something as it fails to find symbols in the krb5 libraries: # sssd -d 1 [sssd[be[KRB]]] [load_backend_module] (0): Unable to load krb5 module with path (/usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.so), error: /usr/lib/sssd/lib

[Bug 557291] Re: error: /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.so: undefined symbol: krb5_cc_retrieve_cred

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43347208/Dependencies.txt -- error: /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.so: undefined symbol: krb5_cc_retrieve_cred https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 557291] Re: error: /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.so: undefined symbol: krb5_cc_retrieve_cred

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Sadly, it seems that a simple rebuild is not enough to resolve this issue. :-( What is interesting of course is that there was no linking time error. What is even more interesting is that the /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.so does not have any krb5 lib dependencies: # ldd /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.s

Re: [Bug 293139] Re: NetworkManager does not use dhclient-exit-hooks.d

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 04:18 +, Mathieu Trudel wrote: > Brian, Hi, > Ubuntu and Canonical didn't exactly make the decisions regarding how > NetworkManager was to handle interfacing with dhclient: upstream, so the > NetworkManager developers themselves did. Fair enough. But as an integrator

[Bug 557291] Re: error: /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.so: undefined symbol: krb5_cc_retrieve_cred

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 510290 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510290 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 510290 sssd_be missing shlib deps -- error: /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_krb5.so: undefined symbol: krb5_cc_retrieve_cred https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557291 You

[Bug 510290] Re: sssd_be missing shlib deps

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Why is this still a problem on Lucid? Lucid is now in beta and this bug is 2.5 months old. The ACK of the fix is (almost) 2 months old even!!! This is not even a difficult problem to solve. You drop the above patch into the diff and rebuild. I just did and it fixes the problem. Ignoring simpl

[Bug 557394] [NEW] missing /var/lib/sss/pubconf/

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sssd Current lucid sssd is missing the /var/lib/sss/pubconf/ directory. If you check the contrib/sssd.spec you can see it packages: %attr(755,root,root) %dir %{pubconfpath} which is defined as: %define sssdstatedir %{_localstatedir}/lib/sss %define pu

[Bug 557398] [NEW] needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sssd The sssd package should include a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss file so that sss can be configured with /usr/sbin/pam-auth-update which, as I understand, is the preferred way of configuring PAM now, isn't it? ** Affects: sssd (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 557398] Re: needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This seems to work here, although I admit I have only a very basic knowledge of this pam-auth-update stuff. Name: SSS authentication Default: yes Priority: 800 Auth-Type: Primary Auth: [success=end default=ignore]pam_sss.so use_first_pass Auth-Initial: [success=end default=ign

[Bug 543506] Re: Upstart not starting jobs on boot

2010-04-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
(Un)fortunately (for the sake of hunting this bug down) this does not seem to be occurring any more. I guess we can just close this bug and I will reopen if I see it again. -- Upstart not starting jobs on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 558338] [NEW] apt is not honoring http_proxy environment variable

2010-04-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt On my just upgraded Lucid machine, I have set: $ export http_proxy=http://proxy:3128 however, apt-get update ignores the proxy setting and still connects to apt servers directly. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: apt 0.7.25.3ubu

[Bug 558338] Re: apt is not honoring http_proxy environment variable

2010-04-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43424437/Dependencies.txt -- apt is not honoring http_proxy environment variable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 293139] Re: NetworkManager does not use dhclient-exit-hooks.d

2010-04-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I have added some comments to the previously mentioned, bug 615073 at bugzilla.gnome.org. In that bug I have pasted an example of gluing a NM dispatch script to a dhclient "e{nter,xit}" script. It's really quite simple. Of course the real solution is to migrate the needed scripts properly to NM'

Re: [Bug 293139] Re: NetworkManager does not use dhclient-exit-hooks.d

2010-04-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:00 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > > That's only a proper solution if NM's dispatcher is fixed to provide the > information that these scripts need. It currently provides a much more > limited set of functionality compared with the dhclient interface. While I'm not neces

[Bug 328575] Re: [gnome-terminal SRU] Cannot start gnome-terminal (or x-terminal-emulator) because of gconf error

2010-04-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This bug still exists on Lucid: karmic-pc $ ssh lucid-pc gnome-terminal Failed to get the session bus: Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-B95HmT1Dsv: Connection refused Falling back to non-factory mode. Failed to summon the GConf demon; exiting. Failed to contact configuration server; some p

[Bug 560214] [NEW] should not depend on hardware specific packages

2010-04-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mythtv Currently libmyth-0.22-0 depends on nvidia specific bits and pieces: Depends: ... nvidia-185-libvdpau This is simply wrong. I should not have to carry the burden of nvidia drivers on my system and dkms having to rebuild them every time there is

[Bug 545019] Re: vinagre and x11vnc -ncache 10 crash X

2010-04-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
No virtualbox installed here and I get the same crash: Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x3b) [0x80e937b] 1: /usr/bin/X (0x8048000+0x61c7d) [0x80a9c7d] 2: (vdso) (__kernel_rt_sigreturn+0x0) [0x9c3410] 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (0x455000+0xb1f39) [0x506f39] 4: /usr/lib/

[Bug 560256] [NEW] system connections not working

2010-04-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager On my current Lucid system, network-manager is not initiating system- connections when it starts. The system connection is properly described in the file: /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/Auto\ wifi It just doesn't seem to get star

Re: [Bug 545019] Re: vinagre and x11vnc -ncache 10 crash X

2010-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:19 +, K Runge wrote: > Does the '-ncache 10' x11vnc option really make a difference (i.e. crash > or not)? I dunno because... > What version of x11vnc is being used? I'm not using x11vnc. The host I am trying to connect to with vinagre is running vino. -- vinagre

[Bug 547244] Re: package libatk1.0-dev 1.29.92-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gir-1.0/Atk-1.0.gir', which is also in package gobject-introspection-repository 0:0.

2010-04-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hrm. I'm still getting an error from this: Preparing to replace libatk1.0-dev 1.28.0-0ubuntu1 (using .../libatk1.0-dev_1.30.0-0ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libatk1.0-dev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libatk1.0-dev_1.30.0-0ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying

[Bug 553619] [NEW] E: Internal Error, Could not perform immediate configuration (2) on perl

2010-04-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: perl Trying to upgrade from karmic to lucid today, I got the following error: # apt-get install perl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and a

[Bug 553619] Re: E: Internal Error, Could not perform immediate configuration (2) on perl

2010-04-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Tags added: karmic2lucid -- E: Internal Error, Could not perform immediate configuration (2) on perl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@list

Re: [Bug 557398] Re: needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss

2010-04-17 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 10:11 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > This was uploaded to lucid, but has been rejected because of several > problems with the integration. > > - the package did not call pam-auth-update in the postinst or prerm, as > required by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PAMConfigFrameworkSp

[Bug 555661] Re: sudo service statd start does not return

2010-04-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
OK. This Karmic machine rebooted (due to power outage, unfortunately) and has done it again. No rpc.statd was running after it was booted and when I check it: # status statd statd start/running, process 1380 # ps -p1380 fw PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND So, upstart... you are a lying bastar

[Bug 555661] [NEW] sudo service statd start does not return

2010-04-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: When I try to start rpc.statd on my Karmic machine, it simply hangs, indefinitely (i.e. until I issue a ^C (sigint)): $ sudo status statd statd stop/killed, process 1427 $ sudo service statd stop stop: Job has already been stopped: statd $ sudo service statd start [ hangs for

[Bug 555661] Re: sudo service statd start does not return

2010-04-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43149007/Dependencies.txt -- sudo service statd start does not return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 555661] Re: sudo service statd start does not return

2010-04-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I should add, that starting it manually works just fine: # rpc.statd -L # mount /home/brian # df -h /home/brian FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on pc:/home/brian 31G 26G 4.0G 87% /autohome/brian -- sudo service statd start does not return https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 293139] Re: NetworkManager does not use dhclient-exit-hooks.d

2010-04-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
We are approaching Lucid quite quickly and this bug has gone 3 months without an update. Can we please get this issue resolved? You have broken very useful functionality for a lot of users. It would be nice to get it restored again. -- NetworkManager does not use dhclient-exit-hooks.d https://

[Bug 293139] Re: NetworkManager does not use dhclient-exit-hooks.d

2010-04-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
With this stupid change, network manager doesn't even use the "ntp server" variable sent to it from the dhcp server. C'mon folks. This is basic, really basic, autoconfiguration functionality. It makes ntp in environements where they don't let machines communicate outside of the network useless,

Re: [Bug 555661] Re: sudo service statd start does not return

2010-04-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 23:19 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > > $ sudo status statd > > statd stop/killed, process 1427 > > What is process 1427? Nothing: # ps -p1427 PID TTY TIME CMD -- sudo service statd start does not return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555661 You received this

Re: [Bug 543506] Re: Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown"

2010-06-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Why have the developer(s) gone totally silent on this issue? Surely there is enough data in this report now to understand the problem(s) and issue (a) fix(es), yes? -- Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506 You received this bug notif

[Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-17 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So, I now have a case where this race prevents a successful boot completely, 100% of the time. The only way I can get a normal boot is to manually mount an NFS filesystem in another window while mountall/upstart has stalled. To clarify, the only way I can get this machine to boot is to boot the k

Re: Re : [Bug 523484] Re: ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem

2010-05-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 10:03 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > Wait for it to be fixed in Maverick ;-) You are kidding right? Please tell me you are kidding. I gotta say, it gets pretty tiring to continually be upgrading Ubuntu releases only to find a whole bag of problems that will be "fix

Re: [Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 23:09 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > In this reproducible case, is this the problem that the network has been > brought up before /var is mounted? I have not been able to test on that platform yet, however... > I.e., if you run 'killall -USR1 > mountall' /instead of/ runnin

Re: [Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 23:09 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > In this reproducible case, is this the problem that the network has been > brought up before /var is mounted? I.e., if you run 'killall -USR1 > mountall' /instead of/ running a mount command by hand, does the boot > continue? Yes sir, it

[Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
FWIW, this new 100% reproducible case is 100% reproducible for a reason, which I will get to in a minute. So, given that in two cases where I have had a stalled boot, signalling mountall with a USR1 has caused the boot to proceed. This seems like a race somewhere. The reason I was able to repro

Re: [Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 15:13 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > Oh, for NFS root, there's bug #537133. It seems there are known > problems still with mountall in that configuration. Funny enough, once I stopped dhclient from resetting an interface's address to 0.0.0.0 (and filing a bug upstream about

[Bug 582858] Re: Unable to login using .rhosts

2010-06-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Yes, indeed, this is a problem with the rsh-server package. The problem is that per libpam-modules: pam (1.1.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * pam_rhosts_auth module obsolete, symlink removed The pam_rhosts_auth module was dropped upstream prior to the lenny release and a compatibility sym

[Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
As an alternative hack/solution to this race (until it's resolved more elegantly within upstart), could we not simply spin in the statd.conf script waiting for /var/lib/nfs to be available? This would be most interesting to do because, in fact, I believe that /var/lib/nfs not being available when

[Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
OK. The spin loop/lock seems to work much better than the start triggers. I still find however that mountall is trying to mount nfs filesystems before rpc.statd is started. Do we consider this an nfs-utils bug or an upstart/mountall bug? -- mountall for /var races with rpc.statd https://bugs.l

[Bug 547139] Re: mountall tries to mount NFS filesystem before statd starts

2010-05-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I see that this was changed from mountall to nfs-utils. I wonder what the reasoning behind that is. It seems to me that it's mountall that's jumping the gun here and trying to mount nfs filesystems before nfs is ready. I can't imagine how nfs-utils can be responsible for or control what mountall

Re: [Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 19:03 +, Joshua Baergen wrote: > > But statd's job is triggered on such NFS mounts, If by triggered you mean that such a mount stops and waits for statd to be started, nope. > so I think that's OK as > long as mountall doesn't do it (or give up) too early, is it not?

Re: [Bug 547139] Re: mountall tries to mount NFS filesystem before statd starts

2010-05-14 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 13:20 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > There is no nfs-utils maintainer in Ubuntu, but as a frequent uploader > of the package, I don't agree that it's a problem at all to try to mount > NFS filesystems before statd starts. The only problem is if mountall > fails to *retry* th

Re: [Bug 523484] Re: ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem

2010-05-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 13:26 +, Trey "WebStandardCSS" Brister wrote: > > Well I am that smart guy and I got the readahead error. Not smart enough... :-) > Boot to Ubuntu live CD Not needed. If you want access to what's in the /var that's on the root filesystem (i.e. what's under the /var

[Bug 523484] Re: ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem

2010-05-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
~sigh~ Yet another bug with regard to boot-up and separate /var. Would it be at all possible for the users/developers/testers of all of this bootup (i.e. upstart, mountall, etc.) software to routinely build their (test) systems with a separate /var? This seems like an all-too-common use-case tha

[Bug 543506] Re: Upstart not starting jobs on boot

2010-05-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Upstart not starting jobs on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 543506] Re: Upstart not starting jobs on boot

2010-05-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Reopening this. I am seeing this problem, very consistently on a Karmic->Lucid upgrade I did today. I will include the previously requested information. Before I do however I want to note that I can consistently have this machine hang on startup after filesystems are mounted by simply booting th

[Bug 578088] [NEW] foreground color not changable

2010-05-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: indicator-applet I can't find a way to change the forground colors of the indicator- applet's icons. In Lucid they are grey, which does not contrast so well against Lucid's default background (i.e. when the panel is transparent). I went into Appearance a

[Bug 578620] [NEW] Failed to open device `brother3:bus1; dev1': Invalid argument

2010-05-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xsane When I try to run xsane as a regular use, a dialog pops up with "Failed to open device `brother3:bus1;dev1': Invalid argument" in it and the only option is to close it. If I run xsane as root (i.e. sudo xsane) everything works properly. Of course,

[Bug 578620] Re: Failed to open device `brother3:bus1; dev1': Invalid argument

2010-05-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48249843/Dependencies.txt -- Failed to open device `brother3:bus1;dev1': Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578620 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 527768] Re: start: Unkown job: statd

2010-05-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I have this problem on doing a karmic->lucid upgrade with apt-get dist- upgrade: $ sudo service statd restart restart: Unknown job: statd $ cat /etc/init/statd.conf statd - NSM status monitor description "NSM status monitor" author "Steve Langasek " #start on (started portmap or m

[Bug 543506] Re: Upstart not starting jobs on boot

2010-05-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This continues to happen on more than one of my karmic->lucid upgrades, very consistently, so I can gather data if needed. Teinit 2 doesn't help. That just runs the scripts in /etc/rc2.d but the ones in /etc/init are left un-run. When the system has stopped starting jobs, here's what initctl lis

[Bug 527768] Re: start: Unkown job: statd

2010-05-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hrm. This must have been an artifact of migrating file changes to the new versions during upgrade. I've fixed that and it seems to not be complaining about statd not being a valid job any more. -- start: Unkown job: statd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527768 You received this bug notification

[Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I think the suggested fix in comment #8 is absolutely evil. The intentions are well-placed but the results of using that work-around are evil and I believe lead to the sort of issues reported in bug #543506. I still have to go to a few more machines and "undo" that change to be completely sure. I

[Bug 525154] Re: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd

2010-05-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I should add, that even with the suggested patch from comment #8 in place, it didn't stop rpc.statd from being started before /var was mounted, so it was not even helping in that manner. -- mountall for /var races with rpc.statd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525154 You received this bug notific

Re: [Bug 543506] Re: Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown"

2010-05-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 16:51 +, Mike Bianchi wrote: > > Where does net-device-up come from? > How does IFACE get set to "lo"? Check out /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart. initctl emit is (one place) where events come from. -- Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown" https:/

Re: [Bug 543506] Re: Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown"

2010-05-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 18:00 +, Mike Bianchi wrote: > > OK. Now the question is, where do /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart and > /etc/network/if-down.d/upstart get called from? They are called from ifup/ifdown. But this is all pretty basic Debian/Ubuntu network plumbing and not really appropri

[Bug 533638] Re: Failed upgrade from hardy->lucid

2010-03-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Ahhh. Ditto. My package update is from March 6, 2010. Trying to use apt-get dist-upgrade: ... 559 upgraded, 159 newly installed, 16 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/358MB of archives. After this operation, 357MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y

[Bug 533638] Re: Failed upgrade from hardy->lucid

2010-03-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Given I was able to reproduce simply with apt, probably this is not "update-manager" specific and needs to be reassigned somewhere else? -- Failed upgrade from hardy->lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533638 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-03-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Given that the files being patched come from pm-utils, I think we need to get some pm-utils attention on this. ** Package changed: xorg-server (Ubuntu) => pm-utils (Ubuntu) -- return from suspend doesn't restore screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522646 You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 485277] Re: Error: The MythTV python interface is not installed or Cannot connect to MythTV Backend

2010-03-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
As of the latest "fixes" release, this problem has morphed slightly. Now every hour every front-end reports: run-parts: /etc/cron.hourly/mythvideo exited with return code 1 The errors go to the jamu.log: # tail -25 /var/log/mythtv/jamu.log ! Warning - MythTV python bindings could not be import

Re: [Bug 485277] Re: Error: The MythTV python interface is not installed or Cannot connect to MythTV Backend

2010-03-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:25 +, Mario Limonciello wrote: > So it looks like a simple bug in the cron jobs that it's looking for the > frontend rather than backend to make sure they are ran on the right > place. TBH, I don't really know. I am not a big "MythVideo" user myself. My primary use-

[Bug 545006] [NEW] permission denied for files i own on nfs4 with kerberos

2010-03-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Something new this morning on my system here... something which was most definitely working yesterday, and the day before that and last week, etc: nfs4_client $ hexdump: /usr/local/etc/Klinux_home_nsupdate+157+0.key: Permission denied nfs4_client $ $ ls -l /usr/local/etc

[Bug 545006] Re: permission denied for files i own on nfs4 with kerberos

2010-03-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41708952/Dependencies.txt -- permission denied for files i own on nfs4 with kerberos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 545250] [NEW] ERROR: Creating templock /var/lock/mrtg/_etc_mrtg.cfg_l_1770: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/mrtg line 1833.

2010-03-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mrtg On current Lucid, on every reboot I get the following error from mrtg: 2010-03-23 13:15:37: ERROR: Creating templock /var/lock/mrtg/_etc_mrtg.cfg_l_1770: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/mrtg line 1833. followed by: 2010-03-23 13:05:11: ERROR

[Bug 545250] Re: ERROR: Creating templock /var/lock/mrtg/_etc_mrtg.cfg_l_1770: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/mrtg line 1833.

2010-03-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41745491/Dependencies.txt -- ERROR: Creating templock /var/lock/mrtg/_etc_mrtg.cfg_l_1770: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/mrtg line 1833. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545250 You received this bug notification bec

Re: [Bug 545250] Re: ERROR: Creating templock /var/lock/mrtg/_etc_mrtg.cfg_l_1770: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/mrtg line 1833.

2010-03-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 17:50 +, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: > This bug was fixed in the package mrtg - 2.16.2-5ubuntu2 Ahhh. That just has not hit lucid yet. Thanx! -- ERROR: Creating templock /var/lock/mrtg/_etc_mrtg.cfg_l_1770: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/mrtg line 1833. http

[Bug 544089] Re: only 1 of 2 CPUs being "discovered"

2010-03-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hrm. I can't seem to find the link to put in a URL of an upstream bug tracker. Maybe somebody else knows where it is for the linux ubuntu package. In any case, this appears to be reported in upstream bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14886 This is also fixed by the latest Lucid ke

[Bug 545339] [NEW] irq 20: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

2010-03-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: While booting the new Lucid kernel on my machine I got the following: 14:56:08 kernel [4.652692] irq 20: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) 14:56:08 kernel [4.656017] Pid: 212, comm: lvm Not tainted 2.6.32-17-generic #26-Ubuntu 14:56:08 kernel [

[Bug 545339] Re: irq 20: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

2010-03-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41760706/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41760707/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41760708/Dependencies.txt ** A

Re: [Bug 540219] Re: not auto-updating the package lists

2010-03-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 14:11 +, Torsten Spindler wrote: > Here the output of the command on my Lucid machine: > $ apt-config shell UpdateInterval APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists > DownloadUpgradeableInterval APT::Periodic::Download-Upgradeable-Packages > UpdateInterval='1' > DownloadUpgra

[Bug 334163] Re: Evolution can't automatically add a downloaded .ics file

2010-01-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Yes, this is reproducible. Simply obtain an ICS (.ics) file and try to open it with evolution: $ evolution ~/Desktop/108481.ics (evolution:19494): evolution-shell-WARNING **: Invalid URI: /home/brian/Desktop/108481.ics Please reopen this bug. -- Evolution can't automatically add a downloaded

Re: [Bug 475426] Re: atk_object_set_name: assertion `name != NULL' failed

2010-01-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 22:31 +, Gabe Gorelick wrote: > Updated the description to reflect the fact that it effects a lot more > gnome apps than gtg. Why bother? It's a gtk bug and it's fixed upstream and I will be a monkey's uncle before it every gets fixed in Karmic. All efforts are on the

Re: [Bug 475426] Re: atk_object_set_name: assertion `name != NULL' failed

2010-01-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Fair enough. -- atk_object_set_name: assertion `name != NULL' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 517820] [NEW] closing the lid suspends even when AC is plugged in

2010-02-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager I have a Toshiba Tecra M9 (although I think the make and model are irrelevant) and I'm finding that when I close the lid, even with the AC power plugged in the laptop suspends. This is new for Karmic on this machine. It's running gno

[Bug 517820] Re: closing the lid suspends even when AC is plugged in

2010-02-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I just logged into gnome and closed the lid and it didn't suspend, so this appears to only be an issue when not logged in. Any ideas? -- closing the lid suspends even when AC is plugged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 450981] Re: iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: Can not allocate SKB buffers

2010-02-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Yes, can we please have the disposition of bug 517807 determined with respect to this bug? If they really are duplicate, let's mark them as such so we are not dividing effort. -- iwlagn :03:00.0: Can not allocate SKB buffers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450981 You received this bug notifi

[Bug 450981] Re: iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: Can not allocate SKB buffers

2010-02-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #14141 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- iwlagn :03:00.0: Can not allocate SKB buffers https://bugs.l

Re: [Bug 495953] Re: needs update

2010-02-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 03:02 +, Mario Limonciello wrote: > Per bug 520564, we won't be fixing this bug in the Ubuntu archive. If > you would like to continue to use nuvexport, you will have to obtain it > from svn.mythtv.org as upstream doesn't normally do regular nuvexport > releases. I gues

Re: [Bug 495953] Re: needs update

2010-02-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 03:23 +, MarcRandolph wrote: > http://www.mythbuntu.org/wiki/MythExport may address some of the same > use cases. Not really. I've looked at it. It's just to big and clumsy for wanting to just transcode a bunch of shows to a PMP. Thanx for the pointer though. Maybe i

Re: [Mythbuntu-bugs] [Bug 495953] Re: needs update

2010-02-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 03:30 +, Mario Limonciello wrote: > We just don't have the resources to be able to maintain this package among > all the others; especially without upstream doing "releases" of nuvexport. Yeah. I do understand. Doesn't make it any less sad (as in emotionally only -- no

[Bug 203251] Re: Toshiba Tecra A9 (Nvidia) does not wake up from suspend

2010-02-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hrm, per the "Launchpad Janitor" (over a year ago): Per a decision made by the Ubuntu Kernel Team, bugs will longer be assigned to the ubuntu-kernel-team in Launchpad as part of the bug triage process. The ubuntu-kernel-team is being unassigned from this bug report. Refer to https://

[Bug 203251] Re: Toshiba Tecra A9 (Nvidia) does not wake up from suspend

2010-02-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
FWIW, this still happens on Karmic (current stable) and my Tecra M9 with an: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Quadro NVS 130M (rev a1) -- Toshiba Tecra A9 (Nvidia) does not wake up from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203251 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 522646] [NEW] return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-02-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: After upgrading to Karmic on my Toshiba Tecra M9 laptop, suspend no longer resumes X11. Instead, Xorg consumes 100% CPU and dmesg complains: [ 3542.034191] NVRM: RmInitAdapter failed! (0x26:0x38:1138) [ 3542.034205] NVRM: rm_init_adapter(0) failed [ 3546.168700] NVRM: RmInit

[Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-02-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39268223/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39268224/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39268228/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 522712] [NEW] return from screensaver fails to "dpms on" one screen

2010-02-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Frequently, when I leave my computer and come back after a while, gnome- screensaver has kicked in, and also put my monitors (CRT on :0.1 and LCD on :0.0) into energy save (i.e. green light has gone amber). I hit a key or move the mouse to bring the monitors back on and displ

[Bug 522712] Re: return from screensaver fails to "dpms on" one screen

2010-02-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39271542/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39271543/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39271544/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 543506] [NEW] not all jobs are started

2010-03-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upstart On Lucid with: # apt-cache policy upstart upstart: Installed: 0.6.5-4 Candidate: 0.6.5-4 Version table: *** 0.6.5-4 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status during boot, upstart just se

[Bug 544089] [NEW] only 1 of 2 CPUs being "discovered"

2010-03-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Only one of my two CPUs is being detected by the lucid kernel. The hardy kernel detected and utilized both CPUs just fine. ProblemType: Bug AlsaDevices: Error: command ['ls', '-l', '/dev/snd/'] failed with exit code 2: ls: cannot access /dev/snd/: No such file or directory

[Bug 544089] Re: only 1 of 2 CPUs being "discovered"

2010-03-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41601946/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41601947/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41601948/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 537472] [NEW] upgrade from hardy to lucid fails

2010-03-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postgrey While trying to upgrade my hardy installation to lucid today I got the following failure to upgrade postgrey: Preparing to replace postgrey 1.31-2 (using .../postgrey_1.32-4_all.deb) ... invoke-rc.d: -

[Bug 537470] [NEW] upgrade from hardy to lucid failed

2010-03-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: While trying to upgrade my hardy machine to lucid today I got the following failure: Selecting previously deselected package mysql-server-core-5.1. Unpacking mysql-server-core-5.1 (from .../mysql-server-core-5.1_5.1.41-3ubuntu7_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cach

[Bug 359658] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2009-10-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
The package listed in comment #17 reporting to fix this: https://launchpad.net/~ted-gould/+archive/bugfix/+files/evolution- indicator_0.1.15-0ubuntu1_i386.deb seems to be no longer available. On another note, why was this simply not put into jaunty-updates? I wonder how many other bugs that i r

Re: [Bug 359658] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2009-10-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 13:55 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > On another note, why was this simply not put into jaunty-updates? I > wonder how many other bugs that i run into on a frequent basis are fixed > by somebody and simply not given to the users > > Because every single fix can't be backpo

[Bug 446174] Re: Upgrade jaunty -> karmic beta problematic

2009-10-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I'm seeing this also, after having done an "apt-get dist-upgrade" upgrade from jaunty to karmic. Obviously I don't have a "dist-upgrade" log, so let's try approaching this from a more trouble-shooting oriented point of view. -- Upgrade jaunty -> karmic beta problematic https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 461648] Re: package language-selector-common 0.4.18 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-10-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34438280/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34438281/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34438282/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 461648] [NEW] package language-selector-common 0.4.18 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-10-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: language-selector Was just doing daily updates of Karmic. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 25 11:31:54 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package:

[Bug 472874] [NEW] No apparent way to change the color and location of the popups

2009-11-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: The new libnotify behavior in Karmic is just not working for me. The prompts are too far out of my primary focus and too dark (in color, not what they are saying :-). I can't seem to find any way to configure where the bubble's pop up nor a way to change their color. The gc

[Bug 474203] [NEW] permissions on usb device for scanner too restrictive

2009-11-04 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: When I try to use xsane as the logged in user, I can select my scanner but when I try to scan I get a I/O Error. If I simply use sudo to run xsane it works perfectly. If I use sudo to change the permissions of /proc/bus/usb/002/002 to 666 it works as a regular user. Problem

[Bug 474203] Re: permissions on usb device for scanner too restrictive

2009-11-04 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35094978/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35094979/XsessionErrors.txt -- permissions on usb device for scanner too restrictive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4742

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >