Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 21:31 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > ok oversaw that you said that you had everything disabled all > extensions. please check that this is not flash then and uninstall that > temporarily. Flash was my first suspect and I ran with that un-installed for a while too and saw the

[Bug 286466] Re: evolution crashed randomly

2008-11-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
The only crashes I get with any regularity now are documented in other bugs. If you don't want to debug with the stack trace I attached I suppose you can close this one. -- evolution crashed randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286466 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 268331] Re: evolution-alarm-notifier being killed

2008-11-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Yes. Killed or it plain exits (1) itself. It usually does so when it pops up a reminder. The reminder shows very briefly and then goes away when the process exits with a return status of 1. -- evolution-alarm-notifier being killed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268331 You received this bug no

[Bug 246843] Re: no access to "about:crashes"

2008-11-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Or how about not disabling it since it does not appear that Ubuntu [can] do much about firefox crashes except suggesting to disable this or uninstall that.. or maybe it's the other. If the actual crash report data would be useful to mozilla.org, then I'm all for sending it there since the stack tr

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Well, its been 5 days and I have not seen you comment in the bugzilla bug yet so I will follow-up here. Is there not some more scientific way to attack this problem than stabbing in the dark at enabling and disabling plugins and extensions (and making firefox unusable) until we find the one causin

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
FWIW, I have now disabled all of my extensions. I will try to use and be productive without them. I have a gdb camped on the firefox process just waiting for something interesting to happen. Given that I have had to start a brand new session with none of my dozen or two tabs open, it might take

[Bug 290355] [NEW] pidgin hangs on address book lookup

2008-10-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin Every now and then pidgin hangs up trying an address book operation. Here's an example: 0xb7f54430 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) where #0 0xb7f54430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7644075 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/tls/i686

[Bug 290355] Re: pidgin hangs on address book lookup

2008-10-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Here's another: Thread 4 (Thread 0xb60cbb90 (LWP 16178)): #0 0xb7f3d430 in __kernel_vsyscall () No symbol table info available. #1 0xb759ec01 in select () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0xb625337f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so.0 No symbol table info a

[Bug 291188] [NEW] segfault in imap_rescan

2008-10-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution On Intrepid: Stack trace: [Thread 0xb3451b90 (LWP 24884) exited] [New Thread 0xb3451b90 (LWP 24888)] [Thread 0xb3451b90 (LWP 24888) exited] [Thread 0xb2444b90 (LWP 24887) exited] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Another: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7c7b6c0 (LWP 30529)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbf85070c, s=0xb113b80, aParticipant=0x8aecd14) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:1287 1287nsCycleCollector.cpp: No such file or directory. in nsCycleColl

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #460916 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460916 ** Also affects: firefox via https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460916 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 08:40 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > is this still a problem with the latest ffox 3? Absolutely. It's been happening many times a day as recent as yesterday. > If so, can you provide > reliable step by step instructions to reproduce? Nope. I'm afraid I can't provoke it in

Re: [Bug 107103] Re: should try to sanitize passwords from attachments

2008-10-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:59 +, Martin Pitt wrote: > > How should it? There isn't a single place which holds/knows all your > passwords, secret projects, personal data, and other sensitive stuff, > except maybe your brain. Sure. The keyring potentially has a wealth of them, yes. Perhaps appo

Re: [Bug 107103] Re: should try to sanitize passwords from attachments

2008-10-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:50 +, Martin Pitt wrote: > That's of course important supplementary data, but on its own it is > worthless to describe the problem, yes. Of course, however along with... > Stack traces can already contain pretty much anything, passwords, PIN > numbers, secret project

[Bug 287086] Re: sigabort

2008-10-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This is not reproducible at will, no. What is a "bt full"? I did do a "thread apply all bt" as you can see in the first comment on this bug. -- sigabort https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

Re: [Bug 189406] Re: Update Manager doesn't display package versions anymore

2008-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 13:43 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > cosmetic I disagree and am somewhat insulted. This is more than cosmetic. Cosmetic is I don't like the color. This is I am not being given enough information to make an informed decision (perhaps based on an assumption that I wouldn

[Bug 275017] [NEW] Segmentation fault (core dumped)

2008-09-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Just updated to Intrepid today (Sept. 26) and when I started evolution, it started once, did a sqllite conversion and now won't run. I will attach the ThreadStackTrace from the crash. I also have any of the standard apport attachments if you w

[Bug 275017] Re: Segmentation fault (core dumped)

2008-09-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17992361/ThreadStacktrace -- Segmentation fault (core dumped) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 275017] Re: Segmentation fault (core dumped)

2008-09-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hrm. An uninstall/install minus evolution-jescs seems to have repaired it. Well that problem anyway. More bugs to come soon. -- Segmentation fault (core dumped) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 275169] [NEW] no kerberos support for pam-auth-update?

2008-09-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: On up-to-date intrepid (Sept. 26, 2008), I can see pam-auth-config profiles for "unix" and "ldap" I can't seem to find one for kerberos. Please advise. ** Affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- no kerberos support for pam-auth-update? http

[Bug 275169] Re: no kerberos support for pam-auth-update?

2008-09-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Maybe this should be filed under libpam-krb5. I'm not sure what the organization here is for such a pam supporting module. I will let you decide and reassign if necessary. -- no kerberos support for pam-auth-update? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275169 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 275180] [NEW] evolution-rss needs update for evolution 2.24.0

2008-09-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-rss It seems that in Intrepid (as of Sept. 26, 2008 anyway) evolution-rss is mutually exclusive with evolution. Kinda silly. Can we get an update? ** Affects: evolution-rss (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- evoluti

[Bug 275457] [NEW] needs update to 2.24

2008-09-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-jescs As can be seen here: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/evolution- jescs/2.24/ evolution-jescs needs an update to a) get the latest version and b) be compatible with current Intrepid which has evolution 2.24 in it. ** Affects: evoluti

[Bug 275457] Re: needs update to 2.24

2008-09-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
ISTM, that to feature freeze "brokenness" is worse than to make an exception to at least try to fix something. In any case, here's the results of your package: $ sudo dpkg -i evolution-jescs_2.24.0-0ubuntu1_i386.deb dpkg: regarding evolution-jescs_2.24.0-0ubuntu1_i386.deb containing evolution-je

[Bug 275457] Re: needs update to 2.24

2008-09-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hrm. The control file from the i386 binary has the following in it: Conflicts: evolution (>= 2.23.0), evolution (<< 2.22.0) Yet the diff has: +Conflicts: evolution (<< 2.24.0), + evolution (>= 2.25.0) -- needs update to 2.24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275457 You received this b

[Bug 275457] Re: needs update to 2.24

2008-09-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I see we are crossing messages on the wire. Will the new package have an updated version? 0ubuntu2 or 0ubuntu1.1 maybe? -- needs update to 2.24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 275457] Re: needs update to 2.24

2008-09-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Yes, this new evolution-jescs seems to read the Java calendar fine but i get an "Unknown error" trying to create a new appointment. Unfortunately there is nothing on std{out,err} to say what the problem is. -- needs update to 2.24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275457 You received this bug noti

[Bug 275457] Re: needs update to 2.24

2008-09-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Ahhh. Hrm. Seems to work now. I just restarted evolution and now it seems to be fully working. Yay. -- needs update to 2.24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailin

Re: [Bug 189406] Re: Update Manager doesn't display package versions anymore

2008-09-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 17:19 +, F-3582 wrote: > Well, if Ubuntu really does make the switch to PackageKit, this will be > a problem of the past, anyway. Yeah. If and when. In the meanwhile there is a small patch that can be applied to update manager to deal with the current issue. I don't un

[Bug 275457] Re: needs update to 2.24

2008-09-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Cesare, Your PPA archive of evoltuion-jescs seems to have disappeared. I had hoped to get the updated version with the resolved conflict so that it would not keep my database in a broken state. -- needs update to 2.24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275457 You received this bug notification bec

Re: [Bug 275457] Re: needs update to 2.24

2008-09-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:32 +, Cesare Tirabassi wrote: > @Brian: Re-Uploaded. Note that you have to remove the one you forced > before installing this version. Hrm. I was able to install it (without removing the old one) and it said it was "downgrading" the old one but all looks fine: $ sudo

Re: [Bug 189406] Re: Update Manager doesn't display package versions anymore

2008-09-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:40 +, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: > This bug was fixed in the package update-manager - 1:0.93.18 Awesome! I'm so looking forward to it! Many many thanx! -- Update Manager doesn't display package versions anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189406 You recei

[Bug 275830] [NEW] need update for evolution 2.24

2008-09-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-rss Current policy for evolution-rss: $ apt-cache policy evolution-rss evolution-rss: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.1.0-1ubuntu1 Version table: 0.1.0-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca intrepid/universe Packages

[Bug 275847] [NEW] gnome-panel hangs on clock applet

2008-09-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: This most likely a problem in the evolution data server handling but the symptom is from gnome-panel, so I will let somebody more knowledgeable handle reassigning to the correct package. In any case, clicking on the clock applet produces a hang with the following back traces:

[Bug 268331] Re: evolution-alarm-notifier being killed

2008-09-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Sebastien, You did not read my description closely enough. There is no "crash". Apport will not be invoked. The evolution-alarm-notifier process is getting killed (SIGKILL) by something else. Please reopen this bug to reflect that I have not failed to provide a valid crash report where none is

Re: [Bug 268331] Re: evolution-alarm-notifier being killed

2008-09-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:45 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > the bug doesn't have useful information, Just because there isn't any useful information, yes does not make the bug categorically invalid. > could you get a debug > stacktrace? I would most certainly if I could. How do you propose to

Re: [Bug 189406] Re: [Hardy] Update Manager doesn't display package versions anymore

2008-06-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 11:12 +, F-3582 wrote: > > If you don't wanna have novice users see all this, because they could > get confused, please dumb the entire interface down and make the old and > "advanced" appearance optional. Yes, optional. Please. Agreed completely. I completely and absol

[Bug 225007] Re: kernel panic with rtl8169

2008-06-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Any idea when we will see this in the Ubuntu (hardy) kernel stream? -- kernel panic with rtl8169 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu

Re: [Bug 272916] Re: Installed Evolution RSS plugin, but it is not in the plugin list

2008-09-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 13:48 +, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: > This bug was fixed in the package evolution-rss - 0.1.0-1ubuntu2 How long does it typically take to get a package into the main Intrepid mirrors? > -- Pedro Fragoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:47:02 +0100 Given that

[Bug 222865] Re: Atheros 5413 Troubles

2008-10-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
The silence is deafening. Anyone got any solutions? -- Atheros 5413 Troubles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.

[Bug 280553] [NEW] intel-agp-ich9m/agpgart.ko hoses xorg with nvidia

2008-10-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I was having problems where when my laptop (Toshiba Tecra M9) resuming from suspend would crash xorg with a segfault. After much dicking around I finally fixed it by moving /lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/ubuntu/char/intel-agp-ich9m/agpgart.ko out of the way and doing a depmod

[Bug 273522] Re: Needs to be updated to PAMConfigFrameworkSpec

2008-10-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Yessiree, it does need to conform, just like I wrote about pam-krb5 in bug 275169. I wonder why all these pam modules are getting left behind as the new world oder marches on. -- Needs to be updated to PAMConfigFrameworkSpec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273522 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 239729] Re: ALSA and OSS not working.

2008-10-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I'm using Intrepid (current as of oct. 10, 2008) with 2.6.27-6 and this problem exists currently. It seems the OSS device is working but the ALSA device is not. When I go to Gnome Sound Preferences and choose: HDA Intell ALC262 Analog (ALSA) and then Test I get: audiotestsrc wave=sine freq=512

[Bug 270922] [NEW] should not consider "proposed" repositories when checking package versions

2008-09-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 $ apt-cache policy apport apport: Installed: 0.108.2 Candidate: 0.108.2 Version table: *** 0.108.2 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca hardy-updates/main Packages

[Bug 211663] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV after importing Digg feed

2008-09-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
And how about a hardy fix too please. -- evolution crashed with SIGSEGV after importing Digg feed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt

[Bug 229704] Re: [nvidia] X.org hangs machine on hardy with "mieqEnequeue: out-of-order valuator event" error

2008-08-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Not to be an AOLer, but "me too". What's strange is that this really only just started happening now even though this machine has been running stably for years, and even stable since upgraded to Hardy when it came out. Now all of a sudden X is hanging and I see in the Xorg.0.log: (II) NVIDIA(0):

[Bug 256053] [NEW] *** glibc detected *** wireshark: free(): invalid pointer: 0x10217180 *** when reloading capture file

2008-08-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wireshark When you use "wireshark -r " to read a capture file and then "Reload" that file in the UI, 100% of the time it will crash as such: $ wireshark -r capture.log [ do work in wireshark, then hit Reload icon: ] *** glibc detected *** wireshark: free

[Bug 29294] Re: please provide a liborbit2-dbg debug package

2008-08-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Why is there still no liborbit debug packages in hardy then? $ apt-cache search orbit astrolog - Customizable astrology chart calculation program kolf - Minigolf game for KDE libidl0 - library for parsing CORBA IDL files liborbit2 - libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB liborbit2-dev - development fi

[Bug 256933] [NEW] segfault in connection_listen_cb()

2008-08-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 $ apt-cache policy gnome-panel gnome-panel: Installed: 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu1.1 Version table: I clicked on that new uber clock panel applet

Re: [Bug 256933] Re: segfault in connection_listen_cb()

2008-08-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 13:20 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: > Thanks for your bug report. Please install the gnome-panel dbgsym > packages which is one of the missed symbols and get a new trace. I will have to wait for it to lock up again then. > And > please for the next time do not attach 2 d

Re: [Bug 256933] Re: segfault in connection_listen_cb()

2008-08-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 15:04 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: > See that's why it's bad to submit two differents traces in one report. > let me edit it again. and please do not do it again. Or of course you could just leave them both in there as one is supplementary information for the other. Wha

Re: [Bug 256933] Re: segfault in connection_listen_cb()

2008-08-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 16:31 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > could you try using apport to send crashes so they can get automatically > debug retracing, etc, Sure, but a) apport tracing is disabled in production releases, such as Hardy and b) apport doesn't seem to be catching this gnome-panel cra

[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it

2008-09-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Disagree the importance of this one is "low". It's a very real usability issue. You have 30 tabs and FF3 crashes (for the fifth time that day) on yet another flash site. Now you have to restart FF3 and enter your proxy account and password 30 times. Is anyone from Canonical or Ubuntu paying att

Re: [Bug 224208] Re: startup script does not start irexec

2008-09-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 05:52 +, Mario Limonciello wrote: > The LIRC application won't be aware of userspace config files What userspace config files? > particularly if operating with NFS mounted home directories. Recall, my MO is a STB. If there is anything NFS mounted there at all it's a co

Re: [Bug 224208] [NEW] startup script does not start irexec

2008-09-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 13:54 +, Mario Limonciello wrote: > Well your x session although not managed by a login manager still does > run as a user. Ahhh. Yes, indeed. I see the point you were making now. > Irexec, like all lirc apps needs to get configuration > loaded when starting. There is

[Bug 202838] Re: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2008-06-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Why didn't the LP stack trace retrace provide a valid stack trace? That aside, this bug is over 3 months old. I tend to doubt I could reproduce it 3 months later. -- gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202838 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 256933] Re: segfault in connection_listen_cb()

2008-08-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 21:29 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > you need to add a ddeb source to have dbgsym packages, Why is that given that many other packages have -dbg packages in the main repository, such as: $ apt-cache policy evolution-data-server-dbg evolution-data-server-dbg: Installed: (

[Bug 257166] [NEW] gnome-panel hangs on clock applet

2008-08-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 $ apt-cache policy gnome-panel gnome-panel: Installed: 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu1.1 Version table: *** 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu1.1 0 500 http://a

[Bug 257404] [NEW] hangs when notifying of an incoming connection

2008-08-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ekiga $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 $ apt-cache policy ekiga ekiga: Installed: 2.0.12-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.0.12-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.0.12-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca hardy/main

[Bug 257404] Re: hangs when notifying of an incoming connection

2008-08-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I should add that "evolution --force-shutdown" causes ekiga to resume it's operations and continue working. -- hangs when notifying of an incoming connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

Re: [Bug 224208] Re: startup script does not start irexec

2008-06-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
ISTM that irexec startup could happen in at least two places, either through a user logging (or being logged) in or through an "STB" startup type method. It may be that there is overlap between the STB startup and a user logging in, however unless a user logging in means an automatic launch of myt

[Bug 275169] Re: no kerberos support for pam-auth-update?

2009-01-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Or you could just put your own config for krb5 in place such as I did: $ cat /usr/share/pam-configs/krb5 Name: Kerberos Authentication Default: yes Priority: 300 Auth-Type: Primary Auth-Initial: [success=end default=ignore]pam_krb5.so Auth-Final: [success=end default=ignore]

[Bug 307472] Re: multiload-applet-2 leaks memory

2009-01-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Given that this is in fact a memory leak and will eventually OOM an Intrepid box, can we have a backport please? -- multiload-applet-2 leaks memory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 323807] [NEW] segfault in (or from, at least) gst_value_init_fraction_range

2009-01-31 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: totem Got a segfault from totem in current Intrepid trying to play a realmedia file. ** Affects: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segfault in (or from, at least) gst_value_init_fraction_range https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 323807] Re: segfault in (or from, at least) gst_value_init_fraction_range

2009-01-31 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "stack trace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21866910/foo -- segfault in (or from, at least) gst_value_init_fraction_range https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

Re: [Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2009-02-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:54 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: > We didn't said we don't care about this, I will quote you: "thanks for the report, that works fine here for me, bug needs to be confirmed by someone else having the issue." That means to me that nothing will be done until somebody

[Bug 321258] Re: segfault

2009-02-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I will attach the valgrind log as requested. It clearly demonstrates the memory leak I talked about but no segfault. ** Attachment added: "valgrind log -- memory leak, no segfault" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22013572/valgrind.log.gz -- segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321258 You r

Re: [Bug 321258] Re: segfault

2009-02-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 18:58 +, Richard Seguin wrote: > Thank you for the valgrind log, it indeed is quite helpful. The only > thing left would be the typical system information. Typically I would > have asked you to re-report this bug using apport, which provides needed > system information

Re: [Bug 275169] Re: no kerberos support for pam-auth-update?

2009-01-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:13 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > For comparison, here's the /usr/share/pam-configs/krb5 I've been using > locally for testing: Looks fairly similar. There seems to be a difference of "" and "-Final" between our two. I'm not sure how significant that is though. > Bryan,

[Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2009-01-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Now that this is back in the right sandbox, any ideas why totem is not working here? -- won't open an http uri https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug

Re: [Bug 309415] Re: SIGABRT in nsDeque::GrowCapacity

2009-01-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 17:05 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > can you reproduce this? No. It happened at random. It's an "abort()" complete with stack trace, so it should be traceable in the code. -- SIGABRT in nsDeque::GrowCapacity https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309415 You received this bug not

Re: [Bug 289377] Re: segfault

2009-01-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 07:53 +, Daniel T Chen wrote: > fixed in jaunty; Well, that's just uhm... jaunty for Jaunty. :-) How about Intrepid though? You know, the release that is currently stable and that everyone is using. ;-) > please reset to New status if reproducible in jaunty I'm not

[Bug 321258] Re: segfault

2009-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "stack trace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21626496/foo -- segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 321258] [NEW] segfault

2009-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin Pidgin just upped and segfaulted on me. I will attach the stack trace. ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321258 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 294259] Re: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1164 of file /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c

2009-01-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Damnit. Just got another one of these. Is nobody from Ubuntu going to even triage this report? This is a very serious bug for anyone using the XFS filesystem. Jan 26 12:59:32 pc kernel: [678572.673862] Pid: 32373, comm: rsync Tainted: P 2.6.27-10-generic #1 Jan 26 12:59:32 pc kernel:

[Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2009-01-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Why not just debug my completely reproducible instance? -- won't open an http uri https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://li

[Bug 303869] Re: STABLE10 available, coss support not stable, use negotiate

2009-01-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So why not put out a release with your own patches to fix this while waiting? -- STABLE10 available, coss support not stable, use negotiate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303869 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

Re: [Bug 307472] Re: multiload-applet-2 leaks memory

2009-01-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 10:46 +, Tom wrote: > Have you installed > > libgtop2.7 > libgtop2.2-common There are no such packages in Intrepid: $ apt-cache policy libgtop2.7 W: Unable to locate package libgtop2.7 > If you haven't got that one installed then maybe install it. If you > already hav

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-12-17 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Ok. So quite a while ago I went to some large efforts to reproduce my crash with no extensions enabled and provided the backtraces and nothing has been done with it yet. C'mon, I held up my end of the bargain and lived through the pain of firefox with no extensions and crashing all the time. Can

[Bug 309415] [NEW] SIGABRT in nsDeque::GrowCapacity

2008-12-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Got a SIGABRT in today's brand new 3.0.5 update. First here's the trace of the aborted thread: #0 0xb807b430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7dcb880 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #2 0xb7dcd248 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/

[Bug 310145] [NEW] SIGABRT in firefox 3.0.5

2008-12-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Another SIGABRT in FF3.0.5 on Intrepid. Here's the stack trace: #0 0xb800a430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7d5a880 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #2 0xb7d5c248 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #3 0xb7d9810d i

Re: [Bug 310145] Re: SIGABRT in firefox 3.0.5

2008-12-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 09:55 +, mcas wrote: > Thank you for reporting this bug. Please answer the following questions: > > Which ubuntu version do you run? Intrepid. > Is this crash reproducible? No. > Which flash package do you have installed? ii flashplugin-nonfree

[Bug 83999] Re: [apport] rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in gst_xvimagesink_event_thread()

2008-12-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
No, and not surprisingly given that this bug report is only a couple of months shy of two years old. -- [apport] rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in gst_xvimagesink_event_thread() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83999 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

Re: [Bug 94130] Re: HTTPS over proxy fails

2008-12-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 13:50 +, Loïc Minier wrote: > To report manually without proxy use: > https_proxy="" apport-cli And how does that work when the machine I'm running on has no routed access to the Internet? i.e. I *have* to use the proxy per corporate policy and network enforcement rules?

Re: [Bug 94130] Re: HTTPS over proxy fails

2008-12-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 14:38 +, Loïc Minier wrote: > > I don't think urllib2 will be fixed in the near future, but we could > look at other means to connect to https for apport (setting up the ssl > socket manually I guess). Well, if you were going to do that, why not just do that work in urll

[Bug 308642] [NEW] hung on return from pause

2008-12-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Using Intrepid, frequently I will return to my workstation after having paused rhythmbox for a long period of time (i.e. over night) and when I try to resume RB, it hangs with the following stack trace: Thread 13 (Thread 0xb3f3fb90 (LWP 1226)): #0 0xb7fbe430 in __kernel_vsys

[Bug 341891] [NEW] /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit: No such file or directory

2009-03-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rpm It seems there is at least one missing file in the Intrepid packaging of rpm: /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh: line 203: /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit: No such file or directory This is called as a result of %__debug_install_post \ /usr/lib/rpm/find-d

[Bug 341909] [NEW] evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in message_info_to_db()

2009-03-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Using 2.25.92 in Jaunty. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in message_info_to_db() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341909 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 341909] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in message_info_to_db()

2009-03-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23787195/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in message_info_to_db() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341909 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 342257] [NEW] update-notifier not reporting updates needed

2009-03-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-notifier Since upgrading to Jaunty, despite the fact that there are updates to be done (update-manager shows them if I open it up), update-notifier is not notifying me that there updates available. Especially for a devel-release, this is silly. T

Re: [Bug 340628] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [unlink:13830]

2009-03-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 330824 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330824 On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 20:13 +, dnyaga wrote: > This seems to be > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/330824. Similar > behavior has been reported here > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: ext4 or 2.6.28 is completely freeze my system

2009-03-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 20:23 +, Agent N2O wrote: > Forgot to mention that the freezing didn't happen ALL the time with the > ext4 deletes. When I was cutting and pasting it would get a few mins in > and freeze, and elsewise I was able to delete some files but others made > it freeze. I suspect i

[Bug 343068] Re: update-manager not visible on UNR

2009-03-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 332945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 So, the one that this is a duplicate of, 332945, has a lot of arguing and politics in it. I don't really care what the politics are at this moment. I just want to know where I get notified of updates given t

Re: [Bug 343068] Re: update-manager not visible on UNR

2009-03-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 332945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:37 +, BUGabundo wrote: > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 332945 *** > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 > > @brian: gconf-editor /apps/update-notifier OK. So I set

[Bug 343979] [NEW] needs update for jaunty

2009-03-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-rss This package needs updating for current Jaunty: br...@pc:~$ apt-cache show evolution-rss Package: evolution-rss Priority: optional Section: universe/gnome Installed-Size: 488 Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers Original-Maintainer: Debian E

[Bug 335476] Re: no way to give /commands from chat window

2009-03-17 Thread Brian J. Murrell
AOL. (me too) -- no way to give /commands from chat window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335476 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Removal of Update Notifier is WRONG

2009-03-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 22:35 +, Jan Claeys wrote: > According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance "Wishlist" should > be used for "a request to add a new feature to one of the programs in > Ubuntu". > > This bug is about a regression, not about a new feature. I absolutely agree that thi

Re: [Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2009-02-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 09:10 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > totem uses gvfs to play non local files and it needs dbus to > communicate, that's not really a bug Aren't applications that need the dbus and don't find one supposed to launch their own instance of it? -- won't open an http uri https:

Re: [Bug 328665] Re: please add bonding support - bond (i.e. wired and wireless) interfaces together for redundancy

2009-02-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:58 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > bonding is on the radar for NetworkManager 0.8; jaunty will get 0.7.1 > ffiw. > > ** Summary changed: > > - bond (i.e. wired and wireless) interfaces together for redundancy > + please add bonding support - bond (i.e. wired and wireless)

Re: [Bug 270922] Re: should not consider "proposed" repositories when checking package versions

2009-03-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 11:59 +, Martin Pitt wrote: > I'm not so sure about this. We disable apport by default in stable > releases anyway, and if you enable it, and also enable -proposed, then > presumably you want it. Not necessarily. My use case is that I may have a particular bug that is af

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >