[Bug 1924732] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carol-meta

2021-12-02 Thread Bin Li
Tried 20.04.3 on M70a, I could found this package in 'Additional Drivers', it could install successfully. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 1924729] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carlisle-meta

2021-12-02 Thread Bin Li
On M70s Gen2, I installed 20.04.3, it could detect this meta after enabled proposed. And it could install oem kernel successfully. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 1924734] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta

2021-12-06 Thread Bin Li
Verified it on M90q, it could installed the meta packages correctly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 1951238] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta

2021-12-06 Thread Bin Li
Verified the meta package on P350 Tiny, I could installed it successfully. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1932439] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-aadi-meta

2021-12-06 Thread Bin Li
Verified this meta on L15 Gen 1, it works fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1934831] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-aaden-meta

2021-12-06 Thread Bin Li
Tried on L15 Gen 2a, this issue works fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 1924730] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta

2021-12-06 Thread Bin Li
Verified on M90a Gen 2, it works fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 1932445] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-cable-meta

2021-12-06 Thread Bin Li
Verified on M75s Gen 2, it works fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 1883174] Re: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

2021-12-07 Thread Bin Li
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883174 Title: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing To manage notifications

[Bug 1954381] [NEW] MediaTek wireless [14c3:0616] didn't work

2021-12-09 Thread Bin Li
Public bug reported: Currently 5.14.0-1008-oem kernel couldn't recognize this card, the wifi didn't work. ** Affects: oem-priority Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: oem-priority originate-fr

[Bug 1954381] Re: MediaTek wireless [14c3:0616] didn't work

2021-12-09 Thread Bin Li
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux- mediatek/patch/84ab45bf42f57fd0301c156ffc11d0fe330ff1f8.1636857817.git.deren...@mediatek.com/ From: Deren Wu New mt7921 serials chip support Signed-off-by: Deren Wu --- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/pci.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insert

[Bug 1954381] Re: MediaTek wireless [14c3:0616] didn't work

2021-12-09 Thread Bin Li
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954381 Title: MediaTek wireless [14c3:0616] didn't work To manage notifications a

[Bug 1954381] Re: MediaTek wireless [14c3:0616] didn't work

2021-12-09 Thread Bin Li
Tested the patch in #2, it will fail to start WM firmware, here is another bug for it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1954300 $ journalctl -b 0 | grep mt7921e Dec 10 02:35:22 u-x kernel: mt7921e :06:00.0: enabling device ( -> 0002) Dec 10 02:35:22 u-x kernel: mt7921e

[Bug 1954381] Re: MediaTek wireless [14c3:0616] didn't work

2021-12-10 Thread Bin Li
Updated mediatek/BT_RAM_CODE_MT7961_1_2_hdr.bin from upstream, it didn't work for 0616. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954381 Title: MediaTek wireless [14c3:0616] didn't work To man

[Bug 1949353] [NEW] [SRU] Revert 'e1000e: add handshake with the Intel CSME to support S0ix'

2021-11-01 Thread Bin Li
Public bug reported: [SRU Justification] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ubuntu-kernel/list/?series=258514 From the 5.13.0-1012-oem kernel we found NO Ethernet connecting after resume from suspend, on 5.13.0-1010-oem we don't met this issue, so this is a regression on I219 in lots of plat

[Bug 1949353] Re: [SRU] Revert 'e1000e: add handshake with the Intel CSME to support S0ix'

2021-11-01 Thread Bin Li
** Changed in: oem-priority Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949353 Title: [SRU] Revert 'e1000e: add handshake with the Intel CSME to support S0i

[Bug 1945565] Re: [SRU] Revert amdgpu/renoir firmware

2021-11-02 Thread Bin Li
Mario Limonciello (superm1) wrote 8 hours ago: Canonical team - I had some more review with internal guys about this. Here's a better solution: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/462084/ This will drop the dependency on FW version for this variable by parsing the loaded FW. That will go int

[Bug 1898005] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT in st_bin_destroy: assertion failed: (priv->child == NULL) called from DesktopManager::_destroyDesktopIcons() [desktopManager.js:234]

2021-11-05 Thread Bin Li
@vanvugt, I checked the latest source code of gnome-shell-extension-desktop- icons, found the desktopManager-Avoid-scheduling-multiple- _layoutChil.patch was not applied, there are not this file in debian/patches/series. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1947818] Re: The fans are constantly whirring on ThinkPad P14S Gen 2

2021-11-09 Thread Bin Li
@rishi, Could you try 'sudo prime-select on-demand'? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947818 Title: The fans are constantly whirring on ThinkPad P14S Gen 2 To manage notific

[Bug 1950936] [NEW] Desktop icons disappearing when saving a file

2021-11-14 Thread Bin Li
Assignee: Bin Li (binli) Status: In Progress ** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: oem-priority originate-from-1943651 sutton ** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1943651 sutton -- You received this bug

[Bug 1950936] Re: Desktop icons disappearing when saving a file

2021-11-14 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "check-fileitem.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons/+bug/1950936/+attachment/5540902/+files/check-fileitem.patch ** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) => Bin Li (binli) ** Changed in:

[Bug 1950936] Re: Desktop icons disappearing when saving a file

2021-11-14 Thread Bin Li
I made a mr for this issue. https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/ShellExtensions/desktop- icons/-/merge_requests/203 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950936 Title: Desktop icons disappearin

[Bug 1950936] Re: Desktop icons disappearing when saving a file

2021-11-14 Thread Bin Li
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1883174 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883174 @vanvugt, Could help review the patch? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950936 Title

[Bug 1883174] Re: Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

2021-11-14 Thread Bin Li
** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1943651 sutton ** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) => Bin Li (binli) ** Changed in: oem-priority Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => In Progress ** Patch added: "check-

[Bug 1945565] Re: [SRU] Revert amdgpu/renoir firmware

2021-11-16 Thread Bin Li
@mario, I checked the 5.14-oem kernel, your patch is not merged into 5.14-oem(linux-oem-20.04d) yet, so we need push your patch into oem kernel first. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1945565] Re: [SRU] Revert amdgpu/renoir firmware

2021-11-16 Thread Bin Li
@xalt7x, Could you help open a new bug for your issue in #9? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945565 Title: [SRU] Revert amdgpu/renoir firmware To manage notifications about

[Bug 1932439] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-aadi-meta

2021-11-16 Thread Bin Li
rtified ** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: OEM Taipei Jenkins Role Account (oem-taipei-bot) => Bin Li (binli) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932439 Title: [MIR] oem-sutton.ne

[Bug 1934831] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-aaden-meta

2021-11-16 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-aaden-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 1.22. ** Summary changed: - [DRAFT][MIR] oem-sutton.newell-aaden-meta + [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-aaden-meta ** Description changed: - [DRAFT][Availability] + [Background] + + Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exce

[Bug 1932445] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-cable-meta

2021-11-16 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-cable-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 1.22. ** Summary changed: - [DRAFT][MIR] oem-sutton.newell-cable-meta + [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-cable-meta ** Description changed: - [DRAFT][Availability] + [Background] + + Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exce

[Bug 1924730] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta

2021-11-16 Thread Bin Li
** Description changed: [Background] Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details. [Impact] 1. Upgrade path: Users will be upgrading from a package in the associated OEM archive, not the Ubuntu a

[Bug 1903847] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carl-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
** Description changed: [Background] Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details. [Impact] 1. Upgrade path: Users will be upgrading from a package in the associated OEM archive, not the Ubuntu a

[Bug 1909735] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carleton-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
** Description changed: [Background] Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details. [Impact] 1. Upgrade path: Users will be upgrading from a package in the associated OEM archive, not the Ubuntu a

[Bug 1924729] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carlisle-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-carlisle-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem- scripts 1.22. ** Description changed: [Background] Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details. [Impact] 1. Upgrade path: Use

[Bug 1924729] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carlisle-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-carlisle-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem- scripts 1.22. ** Patch removed: "oem-sutton.newell-carlisle-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924729/+attachment/5541423/+files/oem-sutton.newell-carlisle-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added:

[Bug 1924730] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem- scripts 1.22. ** Patch removed: "oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924730/+attachment/5517067/+files/oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: "o

[Bug 1909735] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carleton-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-carleton-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem- scripts 1.22. ** Patch removed: "oem-sutton.newell-carleton-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909735/+attachment/5515532/+files/oem-sutton.newell-carleton-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added:

[Bug 1903847] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carl-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-carl-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 1.22. ** Patch removed: "oem-sutton.newell-carl-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903847/+attachment/5515535/+files/oem-sutton.newell-carl-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: "oem-sutton.

[Bug 1924732] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carol-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-carol-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 1.22. ** Description changed: [Background] Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details. [Impact] 1. Upgrade path: Users w

[Bug 1924734] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem- scripts 1.22. ** Patch added: "oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924734/+attachment/5541440/+files/oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this b

[Bug 1924734] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem- scripts 1.22. ** Description changed: [Background] Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details. [Impact] 1. Upgrade path: Users

[Bug 1933167] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
** Description changed: [Background] Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details. [Impact] -  1. Upgrade path: Users will be upgrading from a package in the associated OEM archive, not the Ubuntu a

[Bug 1951238] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 1.22. ** Patch added: "oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951238/+attachment/5541465/+files/oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff ** Tags added: oem-needs-up

[Bug 1951238] [NEW] [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
the archive. https://ubuntu.com/certified/202105-29058 https://ubuntu.com/certified/202105-29059 ** Affects: oem-priority Importance: Critical Assignee: Bin Li (binli) Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: oem-met

[Bug 1933167] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: Fix Committed => Invalid ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1951238] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 1.22. ** Patch removed: "oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951238/+attachment/5541465/+files/oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: "oem-sutt

[Bug 1883174] Re: Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
@vanvugt, Thanks, and we still need to push it into focal for the request from our OEM project. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883174 Title: Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

[Bug 1883174] Re: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
** Summary changed: - Some (or all) desktop icons are missing + [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883174 Title: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop

[Bug 1883174] Re: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
** Description changed: - OS: Ubuntu 20.04 - GNOME: 3.36.2 - Extension: 3.36.2 + [Impact] - Sometimes, some icons in my Desktop folder just don't appear on the - desktop. The missing icons aren't invisible, it's like they're not in - the folder. Clicking on the empty space where they should be

[Bug 1883174] Re: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "check-fileitem-before-using.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons/+bug/1883174/+attachment/5541589/+files/check-fileitem-before-using.patch ** Patch removed: "check-fileitem.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gno

[Bug 1883174] Re: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons_20.04.0-3~ubuntu20.04.6.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons/+bug/1883174/+attachment/5541591/+files/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons_20.04.0-3~ubuntu20.04.6.debdiff -- You received this

[Bug 1883174] Re: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing

2021-11-17 Thread Bin Li
@seb128, Could help review and upload the patch to focal? Thanks! ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: In Progress => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883174 Title: [S

[Bug 1951400] [NEW] chromium will be not responding after clicking the right mouse button

2021-11-18 Thread Bin Li
: High Assignee: Bin Li (binli) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: oem-priority originate-from-1950402 sutton ** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1950402 sutton -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1951400] Re: chromium will be not responding after clicking the right mouse button

2021-11-18 Thread Bin Li
in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) => Bin Li (binli) ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951400 Title: chromiu

[Bug 1951531] Re: Cannot copy file from Nautilus to desktop

2021-11-18 Thread Bin Li
It's an known issue for long time. :) https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/1557#note_873314 https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/ShellExtensions/desktop-icons/-/issues/22#note_667800 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues #1557 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilu

[Bug 1951531] Re: Cannot copy file from Nautilus to desktop

2021-11-18 Thread Bin Li
@andy, Ok, I thought the root cause might be same. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951531 Title: Cannot copy file from Nautilus to desktop To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1951599] [NEW] gnome-shell will crash when eject SDCard

2021-11-19 Thread Bin Li
Public bug reported: When I click eject SD card in Files(nautilus), I found the gnome-shell reported some crash logs. Nov 19 22:43:57 binli-ThinkPad-X1-Extreme-Gen-3 gnome-shell[2357]: == Stack trace for context 0x55a9d8a00120 == Nov 19 22:43:57 binli-ThinkPad-X1-Extreme-Gen-3 gnome-shell[2357]:

[Bug 1953612] Re: Desktop Mouse Right Click -> COPY/PASTE Reuslt NOTHING

2021-12-12 Thread Bin Li
I just check the old version of gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons, I still could reproduce this change, so it's not regression update in 20.04.0-3~0ubuntu20.04.6 at least. I will check the update history and code to find the root cause. gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons: Installed: 20.04.0-3~

[Bug 1953612] Re: Desktop Mouse Right Click -> COPY/PASTE Reuslt NOTHING

2021-12-12 Thread Bin Li
@Itai, Could you help check which is the good version of gnome-shell and gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons? From the last time it worked, and check the /var/log/apt/history.log I met an issue of drag and drop a file one year ago, I thought it should be the same root cause, the mutter didn't

[Bug 1953612] Re: Desktop Mouse Right Click -> COPY/PASTE Reuslt NOTHING

2021-12-12 Thread Bin Li
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1948008 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948008 @daniel, Yes, it should be same issue with lp:1948008, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 1947820] Re: [SRU] Backport xorg-server 1.20.13 to focal

2021-12-14 Thread Bin Li
Hi timo, Do you know when these xorg packages are in updates channel? We need this fix in our OEM project next week. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947820 Title: [SRU] Back

[Bug 1947820] Re: [SRU] Backport xorg-server 1.20.13 to focal

2021-12-17 Thread Bin Li
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947820 Title: [SRU] Backport xorg-server 1.20.13 to focal To manage notifications

[Bug 1928200] Re: Prompt error message "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when shutdown or reboot

2021-12-23 Thread Bin Li
@daniel, Thanks for the solution, and it sounds good, could you help make merge request to finalrd to ask the maintainer's idea? From my side, currently finalrd used by mdadm, I would like to remove the dependency cause mdadm. In systemd/mdadm.shutdown from mdadm, it also do "mdadm --wait-cle

[Bug 1955690] [NEW] Prompt error message "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when shutdown or reboot

2021-12-23 Thread Bin Li
Public bug reported: After I installed the mdadm, it will show this error information, our OEM vendor request to fix this issue. The root cause is that mdadm depend on finalrd, and finalrd will switch rootfs to clean disk, but it cou.dn't umount /oldroot, cause it's used by plymouth. ** Affects:

[Bug 1955690] Re: Prompt error message "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when shutdown or reboot

2021-12-23 Thread Bin Li
** Also affects: mdadm Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: finalrd Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: oem-priority Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1928200] Re: Prompt error message "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when shutdown or reboot

2021-12-23 Thread Bin Li
@daniel, I reported a new issue. Let's focus on below links. Thanks! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1955690 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928200 Title: Prom

[Bug 1955690] Re: Prompt error message "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when shutdown or reboot

2021-12-23 Thread Bin Li
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1940514 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940514 In systemd/mdadm.shutdown from mdadm, it also do "mdadm --wait-clean --scan". But in ubuntu we do not install mdadm-shutdown.service, and do ship finalrd hook. $ cat ./debian/mdadm.finalrd #!/bin/sh # SPDX-

[Bug 1955690] Re: Prompt error message "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when shutdown or reboot

2021-12-23 Thread Bin Li
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1940514 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940514 A solution from Daniel. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1928200/comments/11 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1940514 It will prompt "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when

[Bug 1940514] Re: It will prompt "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when shutdown or reboot

2021-12-23 Thread Bin Li
A solution from Daniel. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1928200/comments/11 ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: In Progress => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1940514] Re: It will prompt "Failed to unmount /oldroot" when shutdown or reboot

2021-12-23 Thread Bin Li
I installed 21.10(impish), I found this issue is gone, there are no error messages. mdadm 4.2~rc2-2ubuntu1 finalrd8 systemd248.3-1ubuntu8 ** Also affects: mdadm Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1939163] Re: Screen splash when suspend or resume on I+N platform

2022-01-06 Thread Bin Li
Sorry for reply late, I tried to swith nouveau, but it couldn't enter suspend with X crash. Jan 07 01:35:30 Drfit3-T-2 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-x-session[1744]: (EE) Jan 07 01:35:30 Drfit3-T-2 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-x-session[1744]: Fatal server error: Jan 07 01:35:30 Drfit3-T-2 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-x-session[1

[Bug 1939163] Re: Screen splash when suspend or resume on I+N platform

2022-01-06 Thread Bin Li
When I switch to intel mode with 'prime-select intel' it will won't load nvidia module, and this issue couldn't be reproduced. And on T14 there are no option to disable the discrete GPU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1951599] Re: gnome-shell logs errors when ejecting SD card

2022-01-07 Thread Bin Li
@daniel, Thanks for your feedback, but it didn't work for this issue. I doubt it's related nautilus, when I click the eject icon in nautilus to umount the sdcard, the item of sdcard is still there, as "4.0 GB Volume", and the sdcard was removed successfuly from kernel's log. So if click the eje

[Bug 1951599] Re: gnome-shell logs errors when ejecting SD card

2022-01-07 Thread Bin Li
@daniel, Oh, I checked the log, found the error messages in description was gone, so the patch fixed the error messages, although it didn't fix the eject issue in nautilus. https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to- dock/commit/d8dbbd8f776ec64d65f9938c2b597104c09ca86f -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 1951599] Re: gnome-shell logs errors when ejecting SD card

2022-01-07 Thread Bin Li
@daniel, Agree with it, and could we SRU this fix into gnome-shell-extension- ubuntu-dock 68ubuntu1 in focal? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951599 Title: gnome-shell logs

[Bug 1909735] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-carleton-meta

2022-01-10 Thread Bin Li
I've tested on V50a-1, it works fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 1966178] Re: Screen-privacy couldn't work

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966178 Title: Screen-privacy couldn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966061 Title: thinkpad_ac

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
With the 10 patches on 5.15.0-25-generic kernel, this issue is fixed. 6306d8dbfae6abbc049cb92fc7cf2acbcd983f8d Tue Oct 5 22:23:22 2021 +0200 - Hans de Goede: drm/i915: Add privacy-screen support (v3) 94b541f53db1ec6b99fc2186b084177cf6e18824 Tue Oct 5 22:23:21 2021 +0200 - Hans de Goede: drm/i915:

[Bug 1966178] Re: Screen-privacy couldn't work

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
Tested on 5.17.0-1003-oem kernel, this privacy item could be showed. But it couldn't sync with 'Fn + D', if it is disabled, click the 'Fn + D', it changed enabled, and changed back to disabled quickly. Looks like it's a kind of bug. Tested my own build image based on 5.15.0-27-generic with upstre

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
Tested on 5.17.0-1003-oem kernel, this privacy item could be showed. But it couldn't sync with 'Fn + D', if it is disabled, click the 'Fn + D', it changed enabled, and changed back to disabled quickly. Looks like it's a kind of bug. Tested my own build image based on 5.15.0-27-generic with upstre

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
There is one rejection for emerge, so I updated the patch. commit 334f74ee85dc26a50c1a2b0da82517595191f92f Author: Hans de Goede Date: Tue Oct 5 22:23:17 2021 +0200 drm/connector: Add a drm_connector privacy-screen helper functions (v2) --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c +++ drivers/gpu

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "0001-drm-connector-add-support-for-privacy-screen.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581222/+files/0001-drm-connector-add-support-for-privacy-screen.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "0002-drm-add-privacy-screen-class.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581223/+files/0002-drm-add-privacy-screen-class.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
There is one rejection for below commit, so I updated it. commit 6306d8dbfae6abbc049cb92fc7cf2acbcd983f8d Author: Hans de Goede Date: Tue Oct 5 22:23:22 2021 +0200 drm/i915: Add privacy-screen support (v3) --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/inte

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "0004-drm-privacy-screen-add-notifier.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581225/+files/0004-drm-privacy-screen-add-notifier.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "0003-drm-privacy-screen-add-x86.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581224/+files/0003-drm-privacy-screen-add-x86.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "0006-thinkpad_acpi-add-hotkey-notify.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581226/+files/0006-thinkpad_acpi-add-hotkey-notify.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "0007-thinkpad_acpi-privacy-screen.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581227/+files/0007-thinkpad_acpi-privacy-screen.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "0008-thinkpad_acpi-register.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581228/+files/0008-thinkpad_acpi-register.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch added: "0009-drm-i915-add-intel_modeset_probe_defer.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581229/+files/0009-drm-i915-add-intel_modeset_probe_defer.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
All the other patches could be applied on 5.15.0-27-generic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966061 Title: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen To manage notifications about this bu

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
In oem kernel, I found part of the 0004-drm-privacy-screen-add- notifier.patch and 0006-thinkpad_acpi-add-hotkey-notify.patch are missed. commit 8a12b170558aabb31cc98fda0da6a56b518cadaa Author: Hans de Goede Date: Tue Oct 5 22:23:16 2021 +0200 drm/privacy-screen: Add notifier support (v2)

[Bug 1966061] Re: thinkpad_acpi: Support privacy-screen

2022-04-18 Thread Bin Li
** Patch removed: "5.17.0-1003.3-oem-privacy-support.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966061/+attachment/5581234/+files/5.17.0-1003.3-oem-privacy-support.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 1970190] [NEW] Wrong default vaule for Brazil Keyboard layout on ThinkPad

2022-04-25 Thread Bin Li
Public bug reported: On ThinkPad, when I select 'Portuguese(Brazil)', it will use 'Portuguese(Brazil)' on second column, but the default value should be 'Portuguese(Brazil)-Portuguese(Brazil, IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad)'. ** Affects: console-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Bug 1970190] Re: Wrong default vaule for Brazil Keyboard layout on ThinkPad

2022-04-25 Thread Bin Li
This is a general issue on 20.04 and 22.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970190 Title: Wrong default vaule for Brazil Keyboard layout on ThinkPad To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 1970190] Re: Wrong default vaule for Brazil Keyboard layout on ThinkPad

2022-04-25 Thread Bin Li
Here is the screenshot. ** Attachment added: "877976752.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-setup/+bug/1970190/+attachment/5583454/+files/877976752.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 1970923] Re: [SRU][F/J] Update firmware of MT7922

2022-04-29 Thread Bin Li
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sutton/+bug/1965460/comments/19 It should be from below commits. commit ee439794cada7b1c26598d3e827ddb6b5b2512d6 Author: Sean Wang Date: Sat Apr 16 05:47:37 2022 +0800 linux-firmware: update firmware for mediatek bluetooth chip (MT7922) Update binary firmware

[Bug 1951599] Re: gnome-shell logs errors when ejecting SD card

2022-02-08 Thread Bin Li
On impish, I tried the new version of gnome-shell-extenstion-ubuntu- dock, I couldn't find this recurring error any more, this issue is fixed on impish. Upgrade: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock:amd64 (70~ubuntu3, 70~ubuntu3.21.10.1) ** Tags removed: verification-needed-impish ** Tags added: ver

[Bug 1938773] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-carlisle-meta

2022-02-08 Thread Bin Li
@gabriel, Could you help verify the meta package on P348 when you back from Spring Festival holidays? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938773 Title: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-ca

[Bug 1948747] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta

2022-02-14 Thread Bin Li
Attach oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem- scripts 1.29. ** Patch removed: "oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948747/+attachment/5554901/+files/oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: "oem-

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >