Public bug reported:
Add/Remove Appication
it doesnt load/install any appication properly
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
it doesnt load/install any appication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381401
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27307528/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27307529/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27307530/ProcStatus.txt
--
adobe
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: file-roller
every time i hav 2 newli install d flash player 4 youtube .com
it is showing me k mdisabl java
bt ol is enable very wel
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/file-roller
Package: file-roller 2
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 85028 ***
thank you for your respond. i've solved the problem by reinstalling the
ubuntu-desktop and beryl. :-) yes, as you've mensioned it was a beryl
issue.
thanks again
anuradha.
- Original Message
From: William Grant <[EMAIL P
Public bug reported:
i don't know what seems to be wrong, a message from gnome panel said
beryl-core has a bug. i'm using ubuntu 6.10 with beryl.
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Gnome pannel not responding
https://launchpad.net/bugs/85027
--
ubunt
Public bug reported:
i don't know what seems to be wrong, a message from gnome panel said
beryl-core has a bug. i'm using ubuntu 6.10 with beryl.
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Gnome pannel not responding
https://launchpad.net/bugs/85028
--
ubunt
** Attachment added: "gnome-panel report"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6425294/_usr_bin_beryl.1000.crash
--
Gnome pannel not responding
https://launchpad.net/bugs/85028
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.0
i dont no more abt dis
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.14+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_IN
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox-3.0
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-gen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393364 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393364
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 393364
copyfs asks for fuse-module even when fuse is compiled in the kernel
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
This bug is resolved in version 1.0.1-5 in Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393364
Title:
copyfs asks for fuse-module even when fuse is compiled in the kernel
To manage notific
Just to clarify, Jacksum is written in Java, so it depends on Java. It
won't run without the JVM present and the package dependencies specify
that.
If performance is critical, I would suggest that you use alternatives
such as md5sum and shaXsum as they don't depend on the VM and have much
less run
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
Binary package hint: libpam-ccreds
This is partly related to #294977.
- User logs in, ccreds caches the "old password"
- User changes the password
- Then the user goes offline without logging in again
This scenario le
Public bug reported:
Bug occured. But i dont know anything about it
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: javascript-common 11
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-24.26-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Anuradha ishan (123ishan)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Anuradha ishan (123ishan)
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ben Collins (ben-collins) => Anuradha ishan
** Changed in: jacksum (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: jacksum (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Anuradha Weeraman (aweeraman)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: copyfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: copyfs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Anuradha Weeraman (aweeraman)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Sorry it took so long, but this should be addressed in the latest update
(2020.0.0+really93u+20120801-7), binfmt-support is now a suggested
dependency.
** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Sorry it took so long, but this should be addressed in the latest update
(2020.0.0+really93u+20120801-7), binfmt-support is now a suggested
dependency.
** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534855
Title:
ksh crashes if .paths is a directory
To manage notifications about this bug
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the
case and chang
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the
case and chang
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the
case and chang
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the
case and chang
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the
case and chang
** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534855
Title:
ksh crashes if .paths is a directory
To manage notifications about t
** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534855
Title:
ksh crashes if .paths is a directory
To manage notifications abou
Chris, thanks for the report and Valgrind observations.
We have reverted ksh2020 back to ksh93u+, in Debian and Ubuntu with the
latest version 2020.0.0+really93u+20120801-8 as of this writing
available for Groovy Gorilla when you install the "ksh" package.
Could you pick up this version and let u
I believe the issue you're referring to is similar to this issue that
was filed recently regarding the "Exec format error":
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965072
Will bring it up with the folks working on ksh93 to see if there's a
resolution that can be found. Let me know if th
Public bug reported:
Request the removal of the ksh93 package from Ubuntu as it has been made
redundant with the rollback of the ksh package from ksh2020 back to
ksh93.
Release to remove from: Groovy Gorilla
What to remove: Source and all binary packages of ksh93
No reverse dependencies
ksh93 pa
Great, I will tag you on future communication on the exec format issue.
Hopefully we'll get to a resolution. Thanks for your time on reporting
the issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
?"
> ---schnapp---
>
> SCRIPT is within doMain() a local scope var. Since this is obviously
> wrong and ksh stops processing at this point, it is a severe issue,
> breaks a lot of scripts (at least in my case).
Could you try this with 1.0.1 or later, preferably 1.0.8. Hopefu
31 matches
Mail list logo
