[Bug 2048876] Re: Allow server and pool sources to be overridden through a conf.d or sources.d configuration

2024-07-10 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Description changed: [Impact] - * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and - justification for backporting the fix to the stable release. + Currently, the default chrony.conf configures a set of pools. If a user wishes to use only a specific server/server pool or not use the d

[Bug 2048876] Re: Allow server and pool sources to be overridden through a conf.d or sources.d configuration

2024-07-10 Thread Ankush Pathak
Hi Bryce, Addressing your feedback per point from comment #12 0. I have put an MP for review[0] instead of a debdiff for this iteration. Please let me know if that's the appropriate way to propose changes to server packages. git-ubuntu is definitely on my list to learn now. 1. I concur with this

[Bug 2078720] [NEW] Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-02 Thread Ankush Pathak
Public bug reported: Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to 24.04 via the `do-release-upgrade` command. This issue was seen whilst testing this upgrade path. Upgrading and later rebooting a jammy GCP instance results in `linux-headers-6.5.0-1025-gcp` being

[Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-02 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Description changed: Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to 24.04 via the `do-release-upgrade` command. This issue was seen whilst testing this upgrade path. Upgrading and later rebooting a jammy GCP instance results in `linux-headers-6.5.0-1025-gcp`

[Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-03 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Attachment added: "Uploading the required dist-upgrade information" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2078720/+attachment/5812723/+files/dist-upgrade.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-03 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Attachment added: "apport file" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2078720/+attachment/5812724/+files/apport.ubuntu-release-upgrader-core.5vja_xtr.apport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-03 Thread Ankush Pathak
Issue was reproducible on jammy generic[0] and kvm[1] download images too. Generic download image ``` $ sudo apt install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt --fix-broken install' to correct these. The following

[Bug 2062929] [NEW] AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy 6.5 kernel

2024-04-19 Thread Ankush Pathak
Public bug reported: A CPC snap preseeding test failure on arm64 is blocking image pulication. A recent update, specifically 6.5.0.1017.17~22.04.1, to the jammy 6.5 kernel introduced AppArmor new profile `unconfined_restrictions`. This is not reflected in the snap preseeding code and needs to be

[Bug 2062929] Re: AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy 6.5 kernel

2024-04-22 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Description changed: A CPC snap preseeding test failure on arm64 is blocking image pulication. - A recent update, specifically 6.5.0.1017.17~22.04.1, to the jammy 6.5 kernel introduced AppArmor new profile `unconfined_restrictions`. This is not reflected in the snap preseeding code and need

[Bug 2062929] Re: AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel

2024-04-26 Thread Ankush Pathak
This bug also affects the mantic 6.5 kernel. ** Summary changed: - AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy 6.5 kernel + AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2062929] Re: AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel

2024-04-30 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Description changed: A CPC snap preseeding test failure on arm64 is blocking image pulication. A recent update, specifically 6.5.0.1017.17~22.04.1, to the jammy 6.5 kernel introduced a new AppArmor profile `unconfined_restrictions`. This is not reflected in the snap preseeding code and ne

[Bug 2074204] Re: AppArmor profiles missing for jammy and 6.8 kernel

2024-08-09 Thread Ankush Pathak
I have tested the package in proposed. The test was done by building a GCE image with the linux-gcp-edge kernel using livecd-rootfs from proposed. Confirmed the following: ``` $ uname -r 6.8.0-1012-gcp $ snap debug seeding seeded:true preseeded: true image-preseeding: 12.545s

[Bug 2074204] Re: AppArmor profiles missing for jammy and 6.8 kernel

2024-08-09 Thread Ankush Pathak
@utkarsh mentioned he was looking into the s390x autopkgtest failure. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 2048876] Re: Allow server and pool sources to be overridden through a conf.d or sources.d configuration

2024-06-26 Thread Ankush Pathak
Hi Bryce, Apologies for the delay in responding. Thank you for your review comments I'll try to address them in my next fix proposal. With respect to the suggesstion you shared about handling well known cases I'll give it some thought myself , discuss it within my squad, gather feedback and re

[Bug 2062929] Re: AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel

2024-06-27 Thread Ankush Pathak
@racb RE comment #4 As far as I understand the only reason the jammy approval should block on mantic approval is that the approvals must happen in the order of releases with later release being before an older release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 2062929] Re: AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel

2024-06-28 Thread Ankush Pathak
Hello Andreas, The CPC jammy and mantic fork of livecd-rootfs have been patched with the fix for this bug since 30 April 2024. Since then CPC have built and tested several images with the patched CPC livecd-rootfs fork. As a part of our testing we run an automated test that follows the steps lis

[Bug 2087949] [NEW] "systemctl status sshd" does not work in noble

2024-11-12 Thread Ankush Pathak
Public bug reported: "systemctl status ssh" and "systemctl status sshd" both work in jammy, but only "systemctl status ssh" works in noble. Expected behavior is that "systemctl status sshd" should work on noble too. The ssh.service file contains "Alias=sshd.service" but this does not seem to be

[Bug 2089039] [NEW] noble minimal cloud images don't have sosreport package installed

2024-11-19 Thread Ankush Pathak
Public bug reported: noble minimal cloud images don't have sosreport installed. This is a regression from jammy where the package was a part of minimal images. For ex. see noble download image manifest[0] vs jammy download image manifest[1]. This is likely a bug in the ubuntu-cloud-minimal packag

[Bug 2089040] [NEW] noble minimal cloud images don't have mdadm package installed

2024-11-19 Thread Ankush Pathak
Public bug reported: noble minimal cloud images don't have mdadm installed. This is a regression from jammy where the package was a part of minimal images. For ex. see noble download image manifest[0] vs jammy download image manifest[1]. This is likely a bug in the ubuntu-cloud-minimal package.

[Bug 2089040] Re: noble minimal cloud images don't have mdadm package installed

2024-11-19 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Summary changed: - noble minimal cloud images don't have mdadm package installed Edit + noble minimal cloud images don't have mdadm package installed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2110484] [NEW] Please merge 14.2.0-1 into questing

2025-05-12 Thread Ankush Pathak
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: python-av (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: python-av (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 2110484] Re: Please merge 14.2.0-1 into questing

2025-05-16 Thread Ankush Pathak
PPA with the merge: https://launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/+archive/ubuntu/questing-python-av- merge-lp2110484 Autopkg tests look good: - python-av: questing/python-av/14.2.0-1ubuntu1 [amd64] + ✅ python-av on questing for amd64 @ 15.05.25 07:33:01 • Log: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/

[Bug 2110484] Re: Please merge 14.2.0-1 into questing

2025-05-27 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/ubuntu/+source/python-av/+git/python-av/+merge/486137 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2110484 Title: Please merge

[Bug 2112113] [NEW] [p-m] rails in questing-proposed FTBFS on amd64 due to use of undeclared dependency

2025-05-29 Thread Ankush Pathak
/+source/rails/2:7.2.2.1+dfsg-7/+build/30675686 Potentially related upstream discussions: * https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/54260 * https://github.com/ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby/issues/1077 ** Affects: rails (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak

[Bug 2112113] Re: [p-m] rails in questing-proposed FTBFS on amd64 due to use of undeclared dependency

2025-06-01 Thread Ankush Pathak
Confirmed locally that pinning ruby-concurrent to 1.3.4 in the build chroot leads to a successful build. This workaround was suggested here[0]. The issue does not appear in debian builds[1] probably because at build time the debian archive already had ruby-activesupport version 2:7.2.2.1+dfsg-6.

[Bug 2111952] Re: Remmina prompts for RDP credentials even when they are saved

2025-06-04 Thread Ankush Pathak
PPA with test build: https://launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/+archive/ubuntu/lp2111952-test-remmina MP: https://code.launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+git/remmina/+merge/486624 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 2110484] Re: Please merge 14.2.0-1 into questing

2025-06-04 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: python-av (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2110484 Title: Please merge 14.2.0-1 into questing To manage notificatio

[Bug 2111952] Re: Remmina prompts for RDP credentials even when they are saved

2025-06-18 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2111952 Title: Remmina prompts for RDP credentials even when they are sav

[Bug 2111952] Re: Remmina prompts for RDP credentials even when they are saved

2025-06-24 Thread Ankush Pathak
Tested version 1.4.35+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1 from oracular-proposed against all the scenarios in the test plan. The test was done on an Oracular Virtual Box VM attempting to connect to a Raspberry Pi on the local network. * Remmina does not produce a prompt when Username and Password fields are correctly

[Bug 2111952] Re: Remmina prompts for RDP credentials even when they are saved

2025-06-13 Thread Ankush Pathak
na/-/merge_requests/2592/diffs ** Also affects: remmina (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ankush Pathak (anku

[Bug 2112053] Re: Merge pam from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-17 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/ubuntu/+source/pam/+git/pam/+merge/487215 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112053 Title: Merge pam from Debian Un

[Bug 2112016] Re: Merge jq from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-05 Thread Ankush Pathak
PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/+archive/ubuntu/lp2112016-jq-questing-merge Smoke tested the following commands on a lxc questing container ``` # echo '{"messages": ["Hello", "world"]}' | jq '.messages | length' 2 # echo '{"messages": ["Hello", "world"]}' | jq { "messages": [ "Hello

[Bug 2111952] Re: Remmina prompts for RDP credentials even when they are saved

2025-06-03 Thread Ankush Pathak
Confirmed bug is present in noble but not in jammy. Hence, marking jammy as invalid. I confirmed by setting up a noble and jammy Vitrual Box VM that had Remmina installed. I setup a profile with credentials to RDP into an Rasperry Pi on my local network and checked if I got a prompt when trying to

[Bug 2112016] Re: Merge jq from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-03 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: jq (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112016 Title: Merge jq from Debian Unstable for questing

[Bug 2112057] Re: Merge plocate from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-03 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: plocate (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112057 Title: Merge plocate from Debian Unstable

[Bug 2112053] Re: Merge pam from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-03 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112053 Title: Merge pam from Debian Unstable for questing

[Bug 2112014] Re: Merge iputils from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-03 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: iputils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112014 Title: Merge iputils from Debian Unstable

[Bug 2111952] Re: Remmina prompts for RDP credentials even when they are saved

2025-05-29 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak) ** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 2112057] Re: Merge plocate from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-06 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/ubuntu/+source/plocate/+git/plocate/+merge/486706 ** Changed in: plocate (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 2112053] Re: Merge pam from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-10 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112053 Title: Merge pam from Debian Unstable for questing To manage notifications ab

[Bug 2112113] Re: [p-m] rails in questing-proposed FTBFS on amd64 due to use of undeclared dependency

2025-06-09 Thread Ankush Pathak
@utkarsh looked into this further. Summarizing his findings and resolution below. ruby-concurrent was causing more FTBS', for ex. ruby-roadies-rails[0], along with some autopkgtest regressions. The most straightforward approach seemed to be to drop ruby-concurrent 1.3.5 from -questing-proposed a

[Bug 2112014] Re: Merge iputils from Debian Unstable for questing

2025-06-09 Thread Ankush Pathak
PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/+archive/ubuntu/lp2112014-iputils- questing-merge ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/ubuntu/+source/iputils/+git/iputils/+merge/486755 ** Changed in: iputils (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You receiv

[Bug 2113485] Re: Shotwell needs new API scopes for Google Photos

2025-06-11 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ankush Pathak (ankushpathak) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2113485 Title: Shotwell needs new API scopes for Goo

[Bug 2117702] Re: Run tests included in the source at package built time

2025-07-23 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Description changed: - libebur128-1 is an optional dependency of pipewire through libspa-0.2-modules-extra, which has to be manually installed in order to use EBUR128 plugin. - It would be good to have libebur128 promoted to main so that the EBUR128 plugin can go back to being pre-installed

[Bug 2117702] [NEW] Run tests included in the source at package built time

2025-07-23 Thread Ankush Pathak
Public bug reported: libebur128-1 is an optional dependency of pipewire through libspa-0.2-modules-extra, which has to be manually installed in order to use EBUR128 plugin. It would be good to have libebur128 promoted to main so that the EBUR128 plugin can go back to being pre-installed with pi

[Bug 2118381] [NEW] [MIR] libebur128

2025-07-24 Thread Ankush Pathak
Public bug reported: [Availability] The package libebur128-1 is already in Ubuntu universe. The package libebur128 builds for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: any (amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x, i386). Link to package h

[Bug 2087827] Re: Pam includes does not look in /usr/lib/pam.d

2025-07-21 Thread Ankush Pathak
** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ankushpathak/ubuntu/+source/pam/+git/pam/+merge/487215 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2087827 Title: Pam includes does not