[Bug 1946213] Re: strongswan: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: strongswan (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paride Legovini (paride) ** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946213 Title: strongswan: Fail t

[Bug 1946198] Re: spice: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: spice (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) ** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946198 Title: spice: Fail to bu

[Bug 1946190] Re: ruby2.7: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: ruby2.7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946190 Title: ruby2.7: Fail

[Bug 1945796] Re: kronosnet: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: kronosnet (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945796 Title: kronosnet:

[Bug 1945763] Re: dovecot: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Bryce Harrington (bryce) ** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945763 Title: dovecot: Fail to buil

[Bug 1945773] Re: haproxy: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945773 Title: haproxy: Fail

[Bug 1908223] Re: nmap 7.80 crashes with Assertion `htn.toclock_running == true'

2021-11-09 Thread Wladimir Mutel
Dear Ubuntu maintainers, do you have any plans of fixing this bug in Ubuntu 20.04 before Ubuntu 22.04 LTS release? In upstream nmap it is said to be fixed since version 7.90 . Do you consider importing version 7.92 into Ubuntu Focal ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 1947497] Re: System crash after upgrade from 2104 to 2110 due to Citrix Workspace app 2109 for Linux

2021-11-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947497 Title: System crash

[Bug 1947497] Re: System crash after upgrade from 2104 to 2110 due to Citrix Workspace app 2109 for Linux

2021-11-09 Thread Avinash Harid
Facing the same issue after installing Citrix Workspace app 2111 for Linux, on Ubuntu 21.10 :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947497 Title: System crash after upgrade from 2104 to 21

[Bug 1950425] [NEW] desktop non responsive after going into hibernation

2021-11-09 Thread pleabargain
Public bug reported: situation: -machine was left running -went into hibernation mode (blank screen) -on return --keyboard not responsive --mouse not responsive -machine was still running -desktop not functional required hard restart to get machine functional again desktop non responsive after

[Bug 1945590] Re: Thinkpad E14 Gen2: Kernel panic with trackpad and trackpoint enabled

2021-11-09 Thread Andrea Righi
Alright, I checked with Chris Chiu, he confirms that all the tests kernels that he provided don't have -fcf-protection=none. However, we still don't think that touching this compiler option is a proper fix for the bug, more likely it's just hiding the problem, so we could still have a potential sta

<    1   2   3   4   5