** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698939
Title:
package libc6:amd64 2.24-9ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package
libc6:amd64 is not ready for
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698940
Title:
package linux-image-4.10.0-24-lowlatency (not installed) failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess ne
Public bug reported:
Error message encountered on startup
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: linux-image-4.10.0-24-lowlatency (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-22.24-lowlatency 4.10.15
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-22-lowlatency x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_u
Seeing the same thing with OCFS2 on Oracle VM Server 3.3.3. Clustered
OCFS2, but on one device and only one node (Clustered when setup,
but then the cluster portion wasn't utilized due to licensing)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
My issue is the same as Ken's (Comment #4)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577172
Title:
xenial python-support doesn't install
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
Greetings!
Have you read the official information about the last incident? You
may find it here http://bit.do/dwTYF
Cheers, RobertC1985
From: Bug 735496 [mailto:735...@bugs.launchpad.net]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 4:33 PM
To: robertc1...@yahoo.com
Subject: Shoutout to OP
Customer calls,
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569925
Titl
Kernel verified.
Jeffrey Hugo
Senior Engineer
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc.
1-303-247-5002
From: Manoj Iyer [mailto:manoj.i...@canonical.com]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:42 AM
To: Jeff Hugo
Cc: 1698...@bugs.launchpad.net; Timur Tabi ; Tyler
Baicar
Subject: could you please help tes
This change was made by a bot.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698940
Title:
package linux-image-4.10.0-24-lowlatency (n
Public bug reported:
.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: samba-common 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-22.24-generic 4.10.15
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jun 19 18:50:43 2017
Err
In attempt to at least get the fix in the distribution if not upstream,
debdiff attached.
** Also affects: bzr-fastimport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Patch added: "bzr-fastimport.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr-fastimport/+bug/1014291/+attach
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698952
Title:
package samba-common 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-i
This bug was fixed in the package powerpc-utils - 1.3.2-1ubuntu2
---
powerpc-utils (1.3.2-1ubuntu2) artful; urgency=medium
* d/p/in-kernel-dlpar.patch: fix FTBFS.
-- Steve Langasek Mon, 19 Jun 2017
14:18:01 -0700
** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed =>
This bug was fixed in the package powerpc-utils - 1.3.2-1ubuntu2
---
powerpc-utils (1.3.2-1ubuntu2) artful; urgency=medium
* d/p/in-kernel-dlpar.patch: fix FTBFS.
-- Steve Langasek Mon, 19 Jun 2017
14:18:01 -0700
** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed =>
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-tweak-tool - 3.25.3-0ubuntu1
---
gnome-tweak-tool (3.25.3-0ubuntu1) artful; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
- Enable 'appmenu' window button when "Application Menu" in GNOME
Shell Top Bar is turned off (LP: #1266992)
* debia
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698958
Title:
package click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-remo
Public bug reported:
I am unable to update Ubuntu through Software Updater, so I tried to
update it manually. I am using the LXDE environment, in order to save
RAM, as it is lighter than Gnome.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1
ProcV
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
The HiSilicon D05 server provides a graphical display that you can view
remotely using a Java app connected to the BMC. While the system boots there,
and the GRUB-generated installer menu appears, the installer itself does not
have a driver to display there.
Curre
** Description changed:
- == Comment: #0 - Jeremy A. Arnold
+ [SRU Justification]
+ On a NovaLink system, the time drmgr takes to complete increases linearly
with the number of virtual adapters. This is unreasonable.
+
+ [Test case]
+ To be completed by IBM, who have access to the hardware.
+
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698958
Title:
pack
Public bug reported:
Any application that has AppStream metadata can be uninstalled using GNOME
Software on Ubuntu 17.10, including the core applications. I was able to remove
many core GNOME/Ubuntu applications using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 17.10, even
GNOME Software itself!
This bug is simil
Hi Christian,
as stated above, found other bugs but as you said they seem to not to be
related to this one so please feel free to close it.
Thanks,
Rolando.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Public bug reported:
1) run mnemosyne via commandline
2) Control-C on the commandline
expected:
either close, do nothing, provide a message "do you want to quit?" or
something.
result:
An unexpected error has occurred.
Please forward the following info to the developers:
Traceback (innerm
Public bug reported:
Not sure what happened
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: linux-image-4.4.0-80-generic (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-79.100-generic 4.4.67
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-79-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubun
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666980
Title:
cann
Public bug reported:
Display freezes under high CPU load/swapping. Thought this would remedy
itself after the swapping is over, but it turns out i915 crashed.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: linux-image-generic 4.10.0.24.26
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-22.24-generic 4
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698966
Title:
package linux-image-4.4.0-80-generic (not installed) failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess new pr
** Changed in: ntp (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582767
Title:
apparmor permissions missing for winbind
To manage notifications about th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
Title:
pa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
This change was made by a bot.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698966
Title:
package linux-image-4.4.0-80-generic (not i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
Cruz, thanks for this.
However, (1) after all the trouble I had getting OpenVPN working, I
don't fancy switching to something else (and my system does work at
present, using the older version of Network Manager).
Also, (2) I don't really understand what you say about /etc/hosts,
though probably I
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
This change was made by a bot.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698965
Title:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer d
Hello; would those of you affected by this bug please attach your
/var/log/apt/term.log file?
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
Title:
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ub
Public bug reported:
I guess the tests run by test_pep8 are more strict now:
test_pep8 (test_pep8.PackagePep8TestCase) ...
/<>/apt_btrfs_snapshot.py:187:9: E741 ambiguous variable name 'l'
/<>/test/test_apt_btrfs_snapshot.py:129:1: E305 expected 2 blank
lines after class or function definition,
Looks like a compulsory_for_desktop tag is missing then:
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-CollectionData.html#tag-ct-compulsory_for_desktop
Or it's set incorrectly.
In any case, this tag should be in effect now that Ubuntu is running the full
GNOME, so I don't know why GS
Public bug reported:
I am not sure that the issue is a bug.
I was trying to install screen by the command prompt when i got the error
message.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: bsdutils 1:2.29-1ubuntu2 [modified: usr/bin/logger usr/bin/renice
usr/bin/script usr/bin/scrip
** Description changed:
[SRU Justification]
On a NovaLink system, the time drmgr takes to complete increases linearly
with the number of virtual adapters. This is unreasonable.
[Test case]
To be completed by IBM, who have access to the hardware.
1. Add 200 virtual adapters to an LPA
Hello Seth,
Is there any update on the status of this request if any?, Could you please let
us know if there is a delay and if Canonical needs anything from microsemi.
Regards,
Raghava Aditya
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
** Description changed:
- Steve brought up bug 1691983 and how it's duplicate signature is missing
- information. It contains:
+ [Impact]
+ apport is creating a shorter than necessary duplicate signature in
apport-package bug reports which can lead to misconsolidation and confused
developers.
+
** Description changed:
+ [SRU Justification]
+ drmgr fails intermittently when adding devices to the system.
+
+ [Test case]
+ To be completed by IBM, who have access to the hardware.
+ 1. Run a scale test of launching 1000 VMs on a Novalink system.
+ 2. Observe that some of the deployments fail
I'm marking this fixed since I consider this to be fixed in Ubuntu 17.10
Alpha. I don't think this is a good fit for a Stable Release Update at
this time.
I gave a little bit of info about this fix in today's release announcement for
Tweak Tool 3.25.3.
https://jeremy.bicha.net/2017/06/19/gnome-tw
Matthias, I can confirm this bug when using GNOME on Ubuntu 17.10 with
GNOME Software 3.24.
I even rebuilt GNOME Software with the PackageKit backend instead of
Ubuntu's apt backend but I could still reproduce the bug.
I tested with GNOME Calculator which is fairly small without many
reverse-depe
Public bug reported:
Tests fail with Python 3.6:
==
FAIL:
autopilot.tests.unit.test_application_launcher.ApplicationLauncherInternalTests.test_get_application_launcher_wrapper_raises_runtimeerror
** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu Xenial)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-16.04.3
** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed i
** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu Xenial)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-16.04.3
** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed i
Public bug reported:
When I try apt-get install crossbuild-essential-arm64, I get ta "broken
packages" error:
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted powerpc-utils into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-
utils/1.3.1-2ubuntu0.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new packag
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted powerpc-utils into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-
utils/1.3.2-1ubuntu2~16.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new p
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted powerpc-utils into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-
utils/1.3.1-2ubuntu0.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new packag
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted powerpc-utils into zesty-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-
utils/1.3.2-1ubuntu2~17.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted powerpc-utils into zesty-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-
utils/1.3.2-1ubuntu2~17.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted powerpc-utils into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-
utils/1.3.2-1ubuntu2~16.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new p
** Changed in: glib
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
** Changed in: glib
Importance: Unknown => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691908
Title:
fstab binds appear as mounts (
What should I do?
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Salisbury"
To: coyl...@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:30:12 PM
Subject: [Bug 1698966] Status changed to Confirmed
This change was made by a bot.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You receive
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Also affects: brz
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716006
Title:
unbind shouldn't suggest upgrade
To manage notifications about this bug
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
snapd was made available in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, so we should make snapd-glib
available too.
[Test Case]
1. sudo apt-get install libsnapd-glib-dev
Expected result:
It installs!
Observed result:
It doesn't :(
[Regression Potential]
Not currently used by anything, so
Public bug reported:
Im a adventurer in linux
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
Package: cracklib-runtime 2.9.2-1build2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-56.61~16.04.1-generic 4.8.17
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-56-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mo
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692335
Title:
p
I had to disable the Qt bindings and the docs as they don't build on
Trusty. We could enable them if necessary with some patching (I doubt
there is a need for either at the current time).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698988
Title:
package linux-image-4.8.0-56-generic (not installed) failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess new pr
Public bug reported:
After initiated the update , it was trying to progress slowly , but at certin
point , it stopped progressing and after 6 hours , it reported .. some issue.
I dint check for error code.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: linux-image-4.8.0-56-generic (no
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698976
Title:
gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in
meta_wayland_surface_get_toplevel()
To
** Also affects: humanity-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: gnome-17.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698795
Title:
App icons in top pa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 992346 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992346
This is important for our health! Sign so states can keep their HEALTH and
REVENUE without fearing an ignorant Alabama man who still believes the old
government lie that Cannabis has no medicinal value. *Th
Upstream bug reports (take your pick?)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772977
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737958
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683204
** Tags added: performance
** Summary changed:
- gnome-shell hogs cpu
+ gnome-shell high CPU in activities
401 - 500 of 582 matches
Mail list logo
