Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 7 May 2011, at 14:51, Marius Kotsbak <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Bug #770680 has an interesting patch. Not sure if that solves more > than > problems with volume keys. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 20 May 2011, at 16:48, james_mcl <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thanks Bryce, > > I did end up replacing the laptop, and it will be a little while > before > I have access to the affected machine again (it now resides in the > attic > at my par

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 11 May 2011, at 15:44, Bryce Harrington <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) > Assignee: (unassigned) => Bryce Harrington (bryce) > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercu

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 13:50, Marius Kotsbak <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Japp, that is the same I see, but the freedesktop describe it as you > need to restart X server to stop it. And some see the bug using USB > keyboard too, but for me only with t

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 12:35, james_mcl <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > This is a two-part reply to Bryce Harrington's comment #294. > > 1.) I really have to take issue with your statement that "it's a minor > annoyance (rather than an X lockup or crash)".

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 13:07, Marius Kotsbak <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I guess the problem is that there are more than one symptoms contained > in this bug and probably more than one bug in possibly xorg and the > kernel. The best would probably be

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 10:30, james_mcl <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Well, I've just been in touch with Ajax. > > I asked if he knew about any experimental thread-based branches: > > "There's http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ajax/xserver/log/?h=input-thread

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 23 Apr 2011, at 19:52, Marius Kotsbak <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Also affects: hundredpapercuts >   Importance: Undecided >   Status: New > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 29 Apr 2011, at 14:11, Marius Kotsbak <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > james_mcl: find/open a separate bug for your particular hardware then. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscrib

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 22:26, Marius Kotsbak <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Bryce, thanks for your insight into this. While starting to > investigate > this problem, I made a very interesting discovery and possibly solved > the issue (at least drastic

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 22:59, Marius Kotsbak <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Regarding the bug severity, I can only agree on that given that we > have > the workaround of disabling keyboard repeat in the X server settings. > Without that, depending on

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 29 Apr 2011, at 13:49, james_mcl <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > In answer to post 310, Bryce, I'm sorry but there's a serious > misunderstanding of the issue in your post. > > You state "hitting a key a second time (to fire a new up-key signal) > m

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 21:06, Bryce Harrington <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Regarding splitting the bug reports up rather than having this one > gargantuan 300+-post bug... > > I do typically prefer having separate bug reports per person/ > machine,

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 29 Apr 2011, at 14:12, james_mcl <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Okay... that last point needed a comment of its own - now to look at > the > other issues raised. > > 1.) "Touch base about this with Ajax to find if he has any > experimental bran

Re: [Bug 124406] Re: Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 20:54, Bryce Harrington <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > While I may think this is a "minor annoyance", the solution is > anything > but, and as such it's not really a paper-cut scale problem. > > ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts >

Re: [Bug 124315] Re: Remember+restore window position of applications with WM_WINDOW_ROLE or window title set

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 27 Apr 2011, at 19:04, Ed Lin <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu) >   Importance: Undecided >   Status: New > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribe

Re: [Bug 124315] Re: Remember+restore window position of applications with WM_WINDOW_ROLE or window title set

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 27 Apr 2011, at 19:10, Ed Lin <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I've added Compiz to this bug as per the discussion here: > https://lists.launchpad.net/ayatana/msg05613.html > > I know about the window placement plugin in CCSM but there are two > pr

Re: [Bug 111939] Re: Not possible to alt-tab during a drag-and-drop operation

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 19 Apr 2011, at 10:44, hamlet <111...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > will this be fixed in ubuntu 11.04? cheers > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts. > https

Re: [Bug 75074] Re: eject cd doesn't work and "just should"

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 11:22, igi <75...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Tags added: natty > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

Re: [Bug 35876] Re: 'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress dialogs request focus too often

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 14:12, Klamm Dodgers <35...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Is there a way to completely disable all applications/programs from > stealing focus? > Cause it really-really-really annoys me! > > -- > You received this bug notification becaus

Re: [Bug 35876] Re: 'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress dialogs request focus too often

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 17:24, Hugh Warrington <35...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Still an issue in Maverick, using xfwm4. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts. >

Re: [Bug 20284] Re: Keep Desktop icons automatically arranged

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 06:46, DSSDSD <20...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > GHD straighteners http://www.rs2goldmart.com/"; > target=_blank>rs money achieve their complete > temperatures > in near to twenty seconds, depending inside the temperatures from the > r

Re: [Bug 16492] Re: Mouse pointer should disappear when keyboard is in use and mouse isn't

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 22:09, David Balažic <16...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Situation same in Ubuntu 11.04... > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts. > https:/

[Bug 816360] [NEW] package man-db 2.5.9-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 255

2011-07-26 Thread repease
Public bug reported: Crashed after initial install while doing system updates. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: man-db 2.5.9-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jul 26 06:54:22 2011 Er

[Bug 816360] Re: package man-db 2.5.9-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 255

2011-07-26 Thread repease
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816360 Title: package man-db 2.5.9-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 255 To manage

[Bug 816358] Re: Latest 11.10a2 fails with GLX under VB

2011-07-26 Thread Sefer Tov
** Attachment added: "glxinfo_and_compiz_output.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816358/+attachment/2233574/+files/glxinfo_and_compiz_output.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 816357] [NEW] package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 3

2011-07-26 Thread sam tygier
Public bug reported: got this after reboot after install of linux-image-2.6.38-11-generic 2.6.38-11.47 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.47-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic

[Bug 816357] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 3

2011-07-26 Thread sam tygier
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816357 Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned erro

[Bug 816355] [NEW] Cannot select text in 'file propeties" dialogue

2011-07-26 Thread imclean
Public bug reported: In 32bit Ubuntu text can be selected and copied from the file properties dialogue. does not work in 64bit version. (for example, if I want to copy and paste the full path of a file) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13 ProcVersi

[Bug 816355] Re: Cannot select text in 'file propeties" dialogue

2011-07-26 Thread imclean
** Attachment added: "Can't select "Location" text" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816355/+attachment/2233538/+files/Screenshot.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816355 Title: C

[Bug 816352] [NEW] package dictionaries-common 1.5.11ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 2

2011-07-26 Thread Quercia SeventyOne
Public bug reported: upgrading from ubuntu 9.01 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: dictionaries-common 1.9.3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-generic 2.6.38.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jul 26

[Bug 816352] Re: package dictionaries-common 1.5.11ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 2

2011-07-26 Thread Quercia SeventyOne
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816352 Title: package dictionaries-common 1.5.11ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stat

[Bug 816325] Re: xzdiff does not preserve diff's return value

2011-07-26 Thread Pallinger Péter
** Summary changed: - xzdiff does not reserve diff's return value + xzdiff does not preserve diff's return value -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816325 Title: xzdiff does not preserve

[Bug 816309] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in SimpleLauncherIcon::SetIconName()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 814639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814639 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #814639, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 816286] Re: lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in _start()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 809890 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809890 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #811222, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 816268] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804133 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804133 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804724, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 816259]

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
StacktraceTop: shell_app_system_get_sections (system=) at shell-app-system.c:1233 ffi_call_unix64 () at src/x86/unix64.S:75 ffi_call (cif=0x20a0240, fn=0x7ff24ceea570 , rvalue=, avalue=) at src/x86/ffi64.c:485 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgjs-gi.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgjs-gi.so.0 -- You re

[Bug 816259] Stacktrace.txt

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816259/+attachment/2233549/+files/Stacktrace.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816259 Title: gnome-shell cra

[Bug 816259] ThreadStacktrace.txt

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816259/+attachment/2233551/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816259/+attachment/2232763/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Impor

[Bug 816234] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804896 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804896 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804896, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 816102] Re: compiz wrongly displays large windows

2011-07-26 Thread Pavol Klačanský
Why? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816102 Title: compiz wrongly displays large windows To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz

[Bug 816028] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:140: dequeue_pending_request: Zusicherung »req == dpy->xcb->pending_requests« nicht erfüllt.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804896 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804896 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804706, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815810] Re: Oneiric won't boot with kernel 3.0.0-6

2011-07-26 Thread Lukasz Olszewski
Same issue with 3.0.0-7 ** Summary changed: - Oneiric won't boot with kernel 3.0.0-6 + Oneiric won't boot with kernel 3.0.0-6 and higher -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815810 Title:

[Bug 815548]

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
StacktraceTop: g_queue_remove (queue=0xff00, data=0x0) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.29.14/./glib/gqueue.c:926 ?? () -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815548 Title: nautilus-actions-

[Bug 815548] Stacktrace.txt

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815548/+attachment/2233594/+files/Stacktrace.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815548 Title: nautilus-action

[Bug 815548] ThreadStacktrace.txt

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815548/+attachment/2233595/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Changed in: nautilus-actions (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 815548] Crash report cannot be processed

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
Thank you for your report! However, processing it in order to get sufficient information for the developers failed (it does not generate an useful symbolic stack trace). This might be caused by some outdated packages which were installed on your system at the time of the report: libgcc1: installe

[Bug 815536] Re: plymouthd assert failure: plymouthd: ply-event-loop.c:352: ply_event_source_free: Assertion `ply_list_get_length (source->destinations) == 0' failed.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 795413 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795413 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #795413, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815515]

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
StacktraceTop: __strlen_sse2_bsf () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strlen-sse2-bsf.S:52 g_test_run_suite (suite=0xbf8911d4) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.29.14/./glib/gtestutils.c:1348 ?? () -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 815515] Stacktrace.txt

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815515/+attachment/2233576/+files/Stacktrace.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815515 Title: cheese crashed

[Bug 815515] ThreadStacktrace.txt

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815515/+attachment/2233578/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815515/+attachment/2229757/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Changed in: cheese (Ubuntu) Importance

[Bug 815480] Re: software-properties-gtk crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in init_distro(): 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xd0 in position 0: ordinal not in range(128)

2011-07-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815480 Title: software-properties-gtk crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in i

[Bug 815480] Re: software-properties-gtk crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in init_distro(): 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xd0 in position 0: ordinal not in range(128)

2011-07-26 Thread Bowmore
I have the same issue for versions 0.81.2-0.81.4. software-properties-gtk crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in init_distro(): 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 13: ordinal not in range(128) It seems to be an ascii vs unicode issue introduced in version 0.81.2 A workaround atm is to

[Bug 815297]

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
StacktraceTop: __strlen_sse2 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strlen.S:43 std::basic_string, std::allocator >::compare(char const*) const () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 pkgCacheGenerator::MergeList(pkgCacheGenerator::ListParser&, pkgCache::VerIterator*) () from /usr/lib/l

[Bug 815297] Stacktrace.txt

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815297/+attachment/2233563/+files/Stacktrace.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815297 Title: synaptic crashe

[Bug 815297] ThreadStacktrace.txt

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815297/+attachment/2233564/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815297/+attachment/2228912/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importan

[Bug 814999] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply: Assertion `!dpy->xcb->reply_data' failed.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804221 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804221 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804221, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 814900] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply: Assertiva `!dpy->xcb->reply_data' falhou.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804221 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804221 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804632, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 814747] Re: metacity crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804702 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804702 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804702, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 814737] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in determine_info()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 745682 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745682 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #745682, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 814726] Re: metacity crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804702 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804702 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804702, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 814720] Re: emerald will not start after latest update to compiz and xorg

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 726229 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726229 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #726229, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 810676] Re: Describes packages as "previously deselected" when they never were

2011-07-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810676 Title: Describes packages as "previously deselected" when they never were To manage

[Bug 814712] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 810182 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810182 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #810182, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 809890] Re: lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_ssse3()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags added: bugpattern-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809890 Title: lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_ssse3() To manage notifications about this

[Bug 804702] Re: metacity crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags added: bugpattern-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804702 Title: metacity crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.laun

[Bug 804133] Re: Segmentation fault: nautilus_icon_container_search_entry_flush_timeout

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags added: bugpattern-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804133 Title: Segmentation fault: nautilus_icon_container_search_entry_flush_timeout To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 807903] Re: open-vm-tools failed to build on i386 and amd64

2011-07-26 Thread Christian Titze
Do I need to re-submit my fix for #572335 now or will LP automatically try to build it with the new package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807903 Title: open-vm-tools failed to build

Re: [Bug 772177] Re: Alt+Tab "Feels" slow

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 2 May 2011, at 13:39, ifj. Kálmán Tarnay <772...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Also affects: hundredpapercuts >   Importance: Undecided >   Status: New > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which

Re: [Bug 772177] Re: Alt+Tab "Feels" slow

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 11:57, One-Man-Bucket <772...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > It's not only the delay configuration Marc mentions. For me the static > window switcher widget appears after a couple of seconds and is > extremely laggy. If do alt+tab a couple

Re: [Bug 769874] Re: Naming restrictions in UFL considered non-free by Debian

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 26 Apr 2011, at 17:01, Bug Watch Updater <769...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Changed in: debian >   Status: Unknown => Fix Committed > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > Font Family Drivers, which is

Re: [Bug 768583] Re: UIFe: Onboard (on-screen keyboard) does not use Ubuntu interface font or colours

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 15:19, Kate Stewart <768...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Changed in: onboard (Ubuntu) >    Milestone: ubuntu-11.04 => natty-updates > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of a duplicate bug

Re: [Bug 766309] Re: .odp and .ods files are not associated with LibO

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 752814 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752814 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 19 Apr 2011, at 19:15, Fabián Rodríguez <766...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 752814 *** >    https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75

Re: [Bug 763892] Re: Bad LibreOffice systray quick start icon

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 Apr 2011, at 20:16, Bruce Hohl <763...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Attachment added: "Screen shot of bad icon from 11.04 beta." >   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763892/+attachment/2055767/+files/Screenshot.png > > -- > You received this bug no

Re: [Bug 763892] [NEW] Bad LibreOffice systray quick start icon

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 Apr 2011, at 20:16, Bruce Hohl <763...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > The LibreOffice systray quick start icon (Gnome Classic session) > includes a background and therefore fails to fit with user selected > theme color.  The ico

Re: [Bug 763165] Re: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 19 Apr 2011, at 16:39, Bug Watch Updater <763...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Changed in: gnome-control-center >   Status: New => Expired > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribe

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 21 Apr 2011, at 08:50, Chris Kenyon <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Great work - looks much much better > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts. > https

Re: [Bug 763165] Re: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 18 Apr 2011, at 19:33, Vish <763...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Will be fixed when we get GNOME3.0 next cycle > > ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) >   Importance: Undecided => Low > > ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) >   Stat

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 Apr 2011, at 13:58, Launchpad Bug Tracker <753...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > This bug was fixed in the package humanity-icon-theme - 0.5.3.10 > > --- > humanity-icon-theme (0.5.3.10) natty; urgency=low > >  * LibreOffice mime icons; (

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 Apr 2011, at 14:14, Launchpad Bug Tracker <753...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/humanity-icon-theme > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundr

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: [FFe] New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Apr 2011, at 07:36, Vish <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Björn Michaelsen, OK, Cool! Then, it just needs to be released... > > (just a reminder for all, the reason we _have_ to copy these icons > into > Humanity is as I've mentioned in comment#

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 13 Apr 2011, at 20:00, Vish <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hmm, I'v just been told that there are only 24hrs more left to get > this bug fixed for Natty... > I've pushed the icons and what i think is fine for mentioning LibO > icons copyright (

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 12 Apr 2011, at 21:18, Vish <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Shnatsel, are you sure you read this bug report?   ;-) > That's what folks want here, I've tried to not break the consistency > with a few minor tweaks to make them fit in. > However, don

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 12 Apr 2011, at 18:47, Vish <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Christoph Noack, thanks for clearing that up about licenses. > > Paul, As I'v mentioned in comment#13, I'll be copying over icons > from LibO. I'm recoloring their MIME cons ito fit the H

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 12 Apr 2011, at 21:09, Launchpad Bug Tracker <753...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > ** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-art-pkg/humanity/release > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 12 Apr 2011, at 13:28, Ivanka Majic <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Tags added: fitandfinish > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts. > https://bugs.

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 12 Apr 2011, at 13:18, Ivanka Majic <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Also affects: ayatana-design >   Importance: Undecided >   Status: New > > ** Changed in: ayatana-design >   Status: New => Confirmed > > ** Changed in: ayatana-design

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 12 May 2011, at 22:48, WarriorIng64 <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I have this issue on a desktop using an integrated GeForce 6150SE > nForce > 430, using the current NVidia proprietary driver. I tried the > workaround > discussed above for i

Re: Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 10 May 2011, at 20:54, izar <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > hp with geforce 6150 go, incresing memory in bios helps me too. > > bruno- if you dont have this option in bios, you should try other > workarounds such as using a different driver (eg. 173

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 May 2011, at 10:10, Bruno <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > My laptop is a Sony Vaio VGN-S5HP, with a GeForce Go 6400, and I > have no > BIOS options to manage the graphics card... Anyone has a suggestion on > how I might be able to do that? > > -

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 May 2011, at 02:22, Ben Shaw <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion dreamfire. Increasing the Frame Buffer > Size in > bios to 256MB increased the reported memory on my card to 512MB also. > > The result is I can now work in u

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 8 May 2011, at 23:00, harvey <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Dream, excuse my ignorance, but could you help me more with this? BIOS > settings are accessed before the computer boots? ty > > I have a BIOS Option for that. It is found under "Advanced

Re: Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 8 May 2011, at 21:20, dreamfire <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I have a BIOS Option for that. It is found under "Advanced Chipset > Features" and is called "Frame Buffer Size" > btw. The GForce 6100 is an integrated Graphics Chip. > > On Sun, 08 Ma

Re: Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 8 May 2011, at 20:30, Josh Leverette <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > How do you increase that? > > On May 8, 2011, at 2:57 PM, dreamfire <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> > wrote: > > Yes it seems to have something to do with memory. (173 haven't work

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 8 May 2011, at 19:57, dreamfire <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Yes it seems to have something to do with memory. (173 haven't worked > here, got a black login screen) I have a GForce 6100. The white > windows > only occur when many programs are o

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 18 May 2011, at 16:37, Rodrigo-canalli <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I'm having this "white window" bug on a Nvidia GeForce 7000 Acer > notebook, since I upgraded from Ubuntu 10.10 (in which this never > happened) to Ubuntu 11.04, in which t

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 8 May 2011, at 12:23, Patrick Dawkins <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I've got the same, in Ubuntu 11.04 with nvidia-current, particularly > while running VirtualBox so when there's little video memory left, > maybe > that's relevant? > > nvidia

Re: Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 May 2011, at 11:37, Josh Leverette <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > No driver + unity 2D > > Sincerely, > Josh > > On May 6, 2011, at 2:16 AM, izar <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > has anyone tried any other nvidia drivers? (such as the 185

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 May 2011, at 04:10, Tenoch <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I have the same problem, It does not happen all the time on my case. > So > when i maximize i see a blank page only with the title bar of the > application having the issue. If i unmaxim

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 May 2011, at 07:16, izar <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > has anyone tried any other nvidia drivers? (such as the 185 version > maybe) > > i tried installing the 173 but then the system coudn't start the x > for some reason. > p.s. i also cant us

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >