[Bug 815662] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in event_filter_func()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 726101 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726101 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #726101, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815162] Re: synergyc assert failure: synergyc: /build/buildd/synergy-1.3.6/lib/arch/CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:289: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `stat

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 746995 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746995 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #746995, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 792301] Re: Ericsson F5521gw 3G module for Lenovo not using optimal kernel module

2011-07-26 Thread Marius Kotsbak
Fix released in upstream modemmanager >=0.4.996. ** Also affects: modemmanager Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: modemmanager Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: modemmanager Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 816221] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:221: poll_for_event: Assertion `(((long) (event_sequence) - (long) (dpy->request)) <= 0)' failed.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804472 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804472 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804472, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 816111] Re: bug with update-manager

2011-07-26 Thread Walter Garcia-Fontes
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 816111 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-bug' and the

[Bug 815690] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:140: dequeue_pending_request: Проверочное утверждение «req == dpy->xcb->pending_requests» не выполнено.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804896 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804896 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #809716, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815456] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:571: _XReply: Assertion `(((long) (req->sequence) - (long) (dpy->request)) <= 0)' failed.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 805693 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805693 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #805693, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815176] Re: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 743724 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743724 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #743724, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 814936] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply: Assertion `!dpy->xcb->reply_data' failed.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804221 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804221 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804221, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 801201] Re: Should use gobject introspection (GTK3)

2011-07-26 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801201 Title: Should use gobject introspection (GTK3) To manage notifications about t

Re: [Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Jul 2011, at 11:31, Paul Wise (Debian) <724...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I guess you didn't notice, but in Debian we are moving to a new font > package naming policy. We are getting rid of the format-specific > prefix for font packages and going

[Bug 656323] Re: should use gsettings rather than gconf

2011-07-26 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: indicator-session (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Conor Curran (cjcurran) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656323 Title: should use gsettings rather than

[Bug 655760] Re: should build without GTK deprecations

2011-07-26 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: indicator-sound (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: indicator-sound Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/6

[Bug 816111] Re: bug with update-manager

2011-07-26 Thread Manfred Hampl
for workaround see https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+faq/1591 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816111 Title: bug with update-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: h

[Bug 816082] Re: Banshee.exe crashed with SIGSEGV

2011-07-26 Thread Jacopo
I'm sorry but when i start "banshee --debug" it occours this Encountered a Fatal Error An unhandled exception was thrown: Could not read add-in description at Mono.Addins.Addin.get_Description () [0x0] in :0 at Mono.Addins.Database.AddinDatabase.InternalGetInstalledAddins (System.Strin

[Bug 815736] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in event_filter_func()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 726101 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726101 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #726101, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815721] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:140: dequeue_pending_request: Assertion `req == dpy->xcb->pending_requests' failed.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804896 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804896 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804896, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815691] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:140: dequeue_pending_request: Проверочное утверждение «req == dpy->xcb->pending_requests» не выполнено.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804896 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804896 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #809716, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815483] Re: Sync bsaf 1.9-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-26 Thread Benjamin Drung
This is probably i slight difference between pbuilder and the official builders. The test fails in pbuilder with "Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable." The packages build in the PPA. Therefore giving an ACK. ** Changed in: bsaf (Ubuntu) Status

[Bug 815407] Re: compiz assert failure: *** glibc detected *** compiz: corrupted double-linked list: 0x09f4e930 ***

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 745242 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745242 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #745242, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815182] Re: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 743724 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743724 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #743724, so is being marked as such. Please loo

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 25 Jun 2011, at 18:47, Dmitrijs Ledkovs <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > running the sscript from bug 788757 against BI is better, cause then > you > get monospace regular but still have bold+italic in Emacs when needed. > > -- > You received th

Re: Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 Jun 2011, at 13:39, Barry Warsaw <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On Jun 17, 2011, at 06:44 AM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote: > > @paul: Ok, after reading bug #727733 I realised I've been out of the > loop. > > My preference was for Ubuntu Mono Beta 21

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Jun 2011, at 13:40, Triwanto Simanjuntak <791...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > The workaround works for me as well. Finally I can enjoy using the > lovely Ubuntu Monospace font in my favorite  Editor. > > -- > You received this bug notification bec

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Jun 2011, at 11:30, Vincent Ladeuil <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hmm it looks like I missed a detail there: it seems the switch from > 'Ubuntu Beta Mono 21' to 'UbuntuBeta Mono' also means I went from 79 > to > 74 lines on a 24" display (a

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Jun 2011, at 10:17, Vincent Ladeuil <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I encounter the same issue on natty. > > I use a slightly different way to select the font (in case it > matters). > I use > >  (setq my-default-font "-unknown-UbuntuBeta Mon

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 16 Jun 2011, at 11:33, Vincent Ladeuil <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Bah, more info: > > 86 lines with "-adobe-courier-medium-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1" > 79 lines with "-unknown-Ubuntu Beta Mono 21-normal-normal-*-14-*-*-*- > *-0-iso10646-1

Re: [Bug 791076] [NEW] choosing normal font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 Jun 2011, at 08:17, Triwanto Simanjuntak <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > I just installed the beta Ubuntu Mono space font and when i tried in > Emacs by: "Options--> Set Default Font -->UbuntuBeta Mono, regular", > the

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Jun 2011, at 19:51, Barry Warsaw <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Also note that something about the horizontal size has drastically > changed.  An 80 character wide Emacs window is now significantly > narrower than it was with the '17' version.

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Jun 2011, at 23:10, Barry Warsaw <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > @Paul, thanks for the explanation.  I'm sure I can adjust to the > sizing > changes, especially since Unity already breaks geometry hints, so I > have > to move windows around

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 5 Jun 2011, at 23:19, Lukas Persson <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Same problem for me, I once tried to install the font Inconsolata > and I > got the exactly the same problem that time around, bold italic was > what > I saw totally ignoring

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Jun 2011, at 19:49, Barry Warsaw <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Something must have just recently changed to cause this (yes, it's > happening for me too).  On Natty, I've been using the Ubuntu Beta Mono > 17 font in Emacs and Terminal for mon

Re: Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 Jun 2011, at 09:48, David Marshall <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I did my own investigation of the font files using version 0.4 of the > monospace. The Regular, Italic, and Bold are all 100% to-spec > monospace > fonts. There is a small metr

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 Jun 2011, at 07:44, Vincent Ladeuil <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > @paul: Ok, after reading bug #727733 I realised I've been out of the > loop. > > My preference was for Ubuntu Mono Beta 21 but I understand why this > wasn't the chosen one. >

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: choosing normal font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 Jun 2011, at 16:39, Xavier Garrido <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Same for me > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > Font Family Drivers, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Font Family. > https://bugs.launc

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: choosing normal font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 Jun 2011, at 08:17, Triwanto Simanjuntak <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Attachment added: "emacs-UbuntuFontMonoSpace.png" >   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076/+attachment/2150200/+files/emacs-UbuntuFontMonoSpace.png > > ** Description

Re: [Bug 791076] Re: choosing normal font in Emacs but gives bolded italic

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:12, Dmitrijs Ledkovs <791...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > No idea if this is a bug in the font or emacs, but it sure is > annoying. > By default emacs doesn't use "synthesized" bold and italics variants > for > monospaced fonts. I

[Bug 777640] Re: journal_id and period_id in account.move.line should be 'related' fields, and hidden in most cases

2011-07-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~openerp-dev/openobject-addons/trunk-bug-777640-bde -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777640 Title: journal_id and period_id in account.move.line should be 'related'

[Bug 771778] Re: missing plugins (pkcs11, ctr, ccm)

2011-07-26 Thread Peter Winterer
With the proposed strongswan packages installed, the missing strongswan libs are available. That means, I'm able to setup and start a strongswan vpn-connection. So, the bug described here, is fixed. Thanks for solving that issue! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: Re: [Bug 770478] [NEW] bfb does not conform with Ubuntu Brand Guidelines

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 Jun 2011, at 12:19, Mark Shuttleworth <770...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Heh. Good catch, Daniel! I think we can approve the exception in > this case. > > status wontfix > > Mark > > > ** Changed in: ayatana-design >   Status: Confirmed => Wo

Re: [Bug 770478] [NEW] bfb does not conform with Ubuntu Brand Guidelines

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 Jun 2011, at 11:21, Launchpad Bug Tracker <770...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > You have been subscribed to a public bug by Daniel Holbach (dholbach): > > Binary package hint: unity > > I'm playing Devil's Advocate here really but the "Ubuntu bra

Re: [Bug 768583] Re: UIFe: Onboard (on-screen keyboard) does not use Ubuntu interface font or colours

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 8 Jun 2011, at 22:44, marmuta <768...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Onboard main has support for themes now. There is an Ambiance theme > included based on Alan Bells design. The system wide default theme > can be specified in a new configuration file

Re: [Bug 746476] [NEW] The "Enable the sync service for this computer" label is confusing

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 May 2011, at 17:49, Launchpad Bug Tracker <746...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > Robert Roth (evfool) has assigned this bug to you for ubuntuone- > control-panel in Ubuntu: > > Binary package hint: ubuntuone-control-panel > > Using 0.9.4 in natty, t

Re: [Bug 746468] [NEW] no obvious link to the website

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 May 2011, at 17:48, Launchpad Bug Tracker <746...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > Robert Roth (evfool) has assigned this bug to you for ubuntuone- > control-panel in Ubuntu: > > Binary package hint: ubuntuone-control-panel > > Using ubuntuone-control

Re: [Bug 724022] Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Jul 2011, at 13:03, Paul Wise (Debian) <724...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Sladen > > wrote: > > My apologies for not being more explicit.  *In light of the on-going > naming scheme change*, I would appreciate

[Bug 816260] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_unref()

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804946 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804946 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804946, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815718] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-daemon: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x000000000191e430 ***

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 810200 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810200 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #810200, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 815490] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply: Assertion `!dpy->xcb->reply_data' failed.

2011-07-26 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 804221 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804221 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804221, so is being marked as such. Please loo

Re: [Bug 782355] [NEW] Invoke sudo and present password prompt when permission is denied to write to a file

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 13 May 2011, at 20:06, Mike Doherty <782...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Binary package hint: nano > > If a user can read but not write a file, as often happens with system > configuration files, then they need to be root or us

Re: [Bug 780776] [NEW] Poor feedback on application loading

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 10 May 2011, at 23:26, Simon Smith <780...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > If you launch an application, for example the media player, and it > take > a few seconds to load there is no feedback that the OS is doing > something. >

Re: Re: [Bug 780776] Re: Poor feedback on application loading

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 21 May 2011, at 23:29, Simon Smith <780...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I am new to ubuntu so don't know the packages well. I use the gnome > desktop, but I think this may be an issue at the x window level. Maybe > gtk as that is the layer above? > > > O

Re: [Bug 778618] Re: ubuntu 11.04 shutdown menu -- system settings should be somewhere

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736971 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736971 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 10 May 2011, at 22:51, Victor Zamanian <778...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Do you mean "shouldn't"? "shouldn't be in shutdown menu"? > > I was just about to repo

Re: [Bug 778618] Re: ubuntu 11.04 shutdown menu -- system settings should be somewhere

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736971 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736971 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 17 May 2011, at 17:56, shinyblue <778...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Who on earth thought that was a good place for it?! Hmmm, complete > this > sentence: > > Se

Re: [Bug 778618] Re: ubuntu 11.04 shutdown menu -- system settings should be somewhere

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736971 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736971 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 May 2011, at 19:17, leighman <778...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Also affects: indicator-applet (Ubuntu) >   Importance: Undecided >   Status: New > > --

[Bug 777640] Re: journal_id and period_id in account.move.line should be 'related' fields, and hidden in most cases

2011-07-26 Thread Bharat Devnani (Open ERP)
Hello Mohammed, Thanks for reporting. The Revision ID and Number of the bug are as follows: Revision ID : b...@tinyerp.com-20110726104509-7agme7dg4x2ftaz8 Revision Number : 4892 The Solution of the bug will be merged in addons soon. Thanks & Regards, Devnani Bharat R. ** Changed in: openobject

Re: [Bug 776427] Re: No warning when the hostname has more than 15 chars

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 16:10, Vish <776...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735072 *** >    https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 > > ** Thi

Re: [Bug 776427] Re: No warning when the hostname has more than 15 chars

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 15:36, Daniel <776...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Also affects: ubiquity >   Importance: Undecided >   Status: New > > ** Project changed: ub

Re: [Bug 776427] [NEW] No warning when the hostname has more than 15 chars

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 15:37, Launchpad Bug Tracker <776...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > You have been subscribed to a public bug: > > Binary package hint: ubiquity > >

Re: [Bug 775089] [NEW] selecting resolution in monitors doesnt change resolution in log in screen etc

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 20:30, ave <775...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Ubuntu doesnt always select the correct/desired resolution for your > monitor. When you choose the correct resolution using the monitors > application, it correct

Re: [Bug 769874] Re: Naming restrictions in UFL considered non-free by Debian

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 26 Apr 2011, at 14:01, Gerfried Fuchs <769...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Mark, I think you are referring to DFSG #4 (Integrity of The Author's > Source Code), especially this sentence: "The license may require > derived > works to carry a different

Re: Re: [Bug 769874] Re: Naming restrictions in UFL considered non-free by Debian

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 11:51, David Marshall <769...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > We regard .ttf as a binary distribution format. Editing it to make > modifications to a font (apart from the very lowest-level bit-flipping > in data tables) is pretty perverse

Re: Re: [Bug 769874] Re: Naming restrictions in UFL considered non-free by Debian

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 26 Apr 2011, at 13:15, Mark Shuttleworth <769...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > The name requirements in the UFL are the result of some protracted > conversations with font designers, and they don't restrict what can be > done with the work in any way, t

Re: [Bug 768583] Re: UIFe: Onboard (on-screen keyboard) does not use Ubuntu interface font or colours

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 27 Apr 2011, at 18:48, marmuta <768...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Changed in: onboard >   Status: Confirmed => In Progress > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of a duplicate bug (751891). > https:/

Re: [Bug 764151] Re: Mono: дф, bad Cyrillic rendering in monospace

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 26 May 2011, at 12:50, Данило Шеган <764...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > FWIW, I don't see this problem with neither „д“ or „ф“ in > particular, > with both R17 and R21. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 763892] Re: Bad LibreOffice systray quick start icon

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 May 2011, at 09:48, Vish <763...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Project changed: hundredpapercuts => libreoffice > > ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) >   Importance: Undecided >   Status: New > > ** Project changed: libreoffice => df-libreof

Re: [Bug 763165] Re: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 18 Apr 2011, at 16:29, Bug Watch Updater <763...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Changed in: gnome-control-center >   Status: Unknown => New > > ** Changed in: gnome-control-center >   Importance: Unknown => Low > > -- > You received this bug noti

Re: [Bug 763165] Re: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 18 Apr 2011, at 16:48, SB <763...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > @Chris, thanks for taking the time to look at this bug. I saw the > bug you reported against gnome-control-center in Bugzilla, and you > suggest there to move the label below the panel. I

Re: [Bug 760917] Re: ubuntu 11.04 beta2 installer crash

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Apr 2011, at 19:08, Vish <760...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command, as it will > automatically gather debugging information, in a

Re: [Bug 760917] [NEW] ubuntu 11.04 beta2 installer crash

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Apr 2011, at 18:12, billytalent <760...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Using Latest version of Virtual Box on an HP Envy 14. Trying to > install > with no power source (on battery) and no internet. > > ** Affects: hundredpaper

Re: [Bug 760917] Re: ubuntu 11.04 beta2 installer crash

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 14 Apr 2011, at 18:12, billytalent <760...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Attachment added: "ubuntu_installer_crash.JPG" >   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760917/+attachment/2035778/+files/ubuntu_installer_crash.JPG > > -- > You received this bug not

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 20:02, Vish <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Yup, it's uploaded now , since Paul got annoyed by people asking > 'are we > there yet' ;) > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which i

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 18:02, Vish <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Chris Kenyon, Launchpad still says bug is triaged.. atleast for me > here it is not showing as fix released..  ;-) > You could speed up the process by finding a sponsor who will upload

Re: [Bug 754614] Re: Upgrade vs Update confusion on Update Manager

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 734026 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734026 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 May 2011, at 09:35, Vish <754...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) >   Importance: Undecided >   Status: New > > -- > Y

Re: [Bug 753584] Re: New Libre office icons are used in the launcher but not in Nautilus / Dash search results

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 Apr 2011, at 17:37, Chris Kenyon <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Am using Beta 2 and the bug is still present. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cut

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 4 May 2011, at 20:09, izar <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > same problem here. > why does everyone blame unity when problem exists also in gnome? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subsc

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 May 2011, at 04:10, Bruce Crowther <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > That's a pretty impressive workaround.  I also increased from 64 to > 128Mb, and that allows me to run 7 maximised windows before I strike > the > problem, using the "current"

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 09:35, Bruce Crowther <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Only had the OS installed for 24 hours and this issue is driving me > bats!  Message #29 suggests I won't get ahead any better by changing > drivers, so I'll just hang fire and

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 08:19, Christophe C <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On the ubuntu french forum, the nvidia driver 173 solve the problem of > some personnes, but not all of them. > > The white blank windows desepear for all of them, but new bugs ap

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 29 Apr 2011, at 16:34, sylvain972 <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Attached: nvidia-bug-report.log. > > ** Attachment added: "Attached: nvidia-bug-report.log." >   https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/753144/+attachment/2096196/+files/nvidia-bug-rep

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 14:19, sylvain972 <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > For me, with driver 173, new bugs appear, as a nearly completely black > screen (with a little normal zone at the top of the screen). > > My computer : Nvidia Integrated 6100, Process

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 13:35, Bruce Crowther <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Must be old age or tiredness: re-read the posts above, changed to > nvidia > driver 173, no more problems.  I could rapidly start to enjoy Unity > now. > > -- > You receive

Re: Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 23:26, Josh Leverette <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > driver 173 is NOT a solution people! it is a workaround. It gives > reduced > performance, etc, etc, etc. nVidia needs to get into action and fix > this. > > On Sun, May 1, 2

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 2 May 2011, at 05:43, Bruce Crowther <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I take your point, Josh, but it is easier for me to leave 11.04 on my > machine and use the 173 driver than it is to reinstall a previous > version of the OS. > > If I was to do

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 14:42, Hubert FONGARNAND <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Problem solved by using the 173 driver version... > > I've just select this driver using the "proprietary" driver ubuntu > tool! > > -- > You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 2 May 2011, at 10:15, Bruno <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I have to agree with Josh. > > I did install 173, and Unity was working fine, so I decided to try out > Gnome 3, and it was a total catastrophe, under 173. The content of the > windows was

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 1 May 2011, at 23:09, Bruno <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Problem solved with the 173 driver too :-) > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundred Paper Cuts. > https:/

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 06:56, Christophe C <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > nvidia card + compiz + nvidia official driver + Unity beta2 + AMD > processor + 2Go memory. > > Precision : the problem occurs in natty / unity AND in natty / Unbuntu > classic. >

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 25 Apr 2011, at 02:56, Josh Leverette <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Duly note.. my nvidia driver marks as activated but not in use even > after completely reinstalling and multiple reboots. This could factor > in? > > -- > You received this bug

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 30 Apr 2011, at 17:53, Hubert FONGARNAND <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Same problem for me: > > My computer : Nvidia Integrated 6100, Processor AMD64, Ubuntu 11.04 > 32, > Unity, 1 go RAM. > > 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporat

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 3 May 2011, at 19:10, harvey <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I only just switched to Ubuntu for the first time a few days ago. > Maximized windows go blank on my old desktop (has nvidia), but natty > is > running perfectly on my netbook (no nvidia

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 4 May 2011, at 08:58, Bruce Crowther <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Quote from Peter Laird, "This is a tangent, but you can extract the > content of your old notes via: > > cat ~/.gnome2/stickynotes_applet" > > Or just browse via Nautilus and ope

Re: [Bug 753144] Re: focused, or maximized windows blank

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 10:39, jack <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Same problem here: > nvidia card (Geforce 6200) with nvidia official driver (270.41.06) + > compiz > i can use the dock and unity but every window is blank white until i > resize it to

Re: [Bug 752814] Re: Impress not the default app for ODP documents

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 20 Apr 2011, at 10:40, Launchpad Bug Tracker <752...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/desktop-file-utils > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Papercutters, which is subscribed to One Hundre

Re: [Bug 751891] [NEW] onboard does not follow Ubuntu branding and looks dated

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 768583 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768583 I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 21 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Launchpad Bug Tracker <751...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > You have been subscribed to a public bug by Paul Sladen (sladen): > > Binary pa

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 12:10, David Henningsson <740...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Attachment added: "moo.png" >   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/740864/+attachment/2092774/+files/moo.png > > -- > You received this bug notif

Re: [Bug 753075] Re: Error spam on live shutdown

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 15 May 2011, at 09:41, Vish <753...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thank you for bringing this bug to our attention. However, a paper > cut should be a small usability issue, in the default Ubuntu > install, that affects many people and is quick and ea

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 28 Apr 2011, at 12:10, David Henningsson <740...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > @mpt, I'm attaching a screenshot. There are four moo:s in the text, > three are yellow and one is #e5e3e1. The yellow ones stand out much > more > clearly than the light gr

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 10:47, Vish <740...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Yup, not an immediate concern > > ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu) >   Status: Fix Released => Triaged > > ** Also affects: gedit (Ubuntu) >   Importance: Undecided >   Status:

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 06:49, Vish <740...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Werent the other matches requested by the design team as per Bug > #767531 > ? "Recommended main changes to thin out the scrollbar" > > @James, base[ACTIVE] = shade (0.9, @selected_bg_col

Re: [Bug 740864] Re: Find result is too light gray

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 22 Apr 2011, at 10:12, Vish <740...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > We could try fixing this by editing : > /usr/share/gtksourceview-2.0/styles/classic.xml , thats the theme > gedit uses by default > We have > >     > > Maybe we need a new

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >