Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2008-01-29 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Christian Kellner wrote: > There exists a work-around by patching grub stage1. Find the patch and > the binary here: http://boeglin.org/blog/. I did it here and its working > like a charm. This is a neat hack. If I get a morning or afternoon clear (with a boot disc handy), I might try it. I hack

Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-05 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Matthew Garrett wrote: > Just adding the ID to ahci.c would break a large number of other > machines, so while easy it's not possible. I spent a few hours one day trying to reprogram the controller using setpci from initramfs and didn't have any luck. It appeared that once the controller had its

Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-05 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Matthew Garrett wrote: > The firmware programs the sata controller into piix mode, not ahci mode. > On this specific hardware, the ahci driver is able to reprogram it - > however, that isn't guaranteed in general, and attempts to do so have > led to unfortunate behaviour like missing CD drives. Rig

Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-03 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Stephen Touset wrote: > Has this been fixed? > > It was reported that there was a patch in testing, but I've seen no > activity since. This seems to still be in Gutsy. The bug is still present in Gutsy as of a previous beta (I'm about 2 months out-of-date). I can retest this week with the latest

Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-04-05 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Christian Kellner wrote: > This is acutally a dup of bug 64433 I filed a while ago. I am pretty > sure it was fixed at some point but is now back again. The slow disk > speed is damn annoying. I have only tracked Feisty for about two weeks, and my drives performed great with Edgy and 2.6.17. Actu