On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:54 AM, jdetras wrote:
> If the importance dictates its urgency for fixing, then it should be.
> Two years, as I see it, looks like there is no one interested in fixing
> this as of the moment.
if you're not happy with, it'll certainly be faster to correct that
yourself, a
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:30 AM, jdetras wrote:
> It has been more than two years since it is first reported in Ubuntu
> Feisty. And it is still present in Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty). It should be of
> High importance now.
>
I would like to know why it would high importance, the priority is not
defined
