Re: [Bug 675758] Re: libtdsodbc.so misnamed

2010-12-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:38:15AM -, mycae wrote: > Thankyou for the info, I don't suppose you could point me to the > difference between a DSO and a normal SO, I was of the opinion that > these were different names for the same thing, a'la > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/dso.html , > and

Re: [Bug 675758] Re: libtdsodbc.so misnamed

2010-11-15 Thread mycae
675...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > From: mycae <675...@bugs.launchpad.net> > Subject: Re: [Bug 675758] Re: libtdsodbc.so misnamed > To: my...@yahoo.com > Date: Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 1:38 PM > Hello, > > Thankyou for the info, I don't suppose you could point me >

Re: [Bug 675758] Re: libtdsodbc.so misnamed

2010-11-15 Thread mycae
Hello, Thankyou for the info, I don't suppose you could point me to the difference between a DSO and a normal SO, I was of the opinion that these were different names for the same thing, a'la http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/dso.html , and the debian policy manual recommended soversioning in fil