Re: [Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

2009-01-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 03:10:06AM -, Tommy Williams wrote: > In the ubuntu server distributions use of UUIDs should be disabled, and > legacy /dev/ support should be re-inserted. Definitely not. Servers are the systems *most* likely to be affected by non-persistent device names in general (b

Re: [Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

2008-10-21 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 18/10/2008, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:11:20AM -, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > The Ubuntu people are really stubborn, and if they decided to not fix > > something they won't. > > > That's completely uncalled-for given that I've *twice* acknowledged

Re: [Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

2008-10-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:11:20AM -, Michal Suchanek wrote: > The Ubuntu people are really stubborn, and if they decided to not fix > something they won't. That's completely uncalled-for given that I've *twice* acknowledged in the bug log that this is a bug that should be fixed. Please do no

Re: [Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

2008-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 07:17:16PM -, Gary wrote: > UUID doesn't work if you use ghost to image the disk and then restore it > somewhere else. Isn't ghost a full-disk backup/restore solution? If it is, then UUIDs should work correctly in such an environment. On the flip side, ghost would als

Re: [Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

2008-04-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 02:20:17PM -, David Masover wrote: > It could be that the UUID code doesn't know to track RAID at all, and > only looks at devices that were available at kernel boot time, before > the initramfs? No, that's not the case, a large number of devices are only available once

Re: [Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

2008-04-25 Thread Walter Tautz
martyg wrote: > +1 > > I wasted 2 hours this week tracking this same problem down. > > You would think since Importance == HIGH this issue would have been > dealt with long ago. > > Yes, it's annoying but it does point out the need to always check bug trackers first *before* wasting one's time,

Re: [Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

2006-09-26 Thread Dennis Kaarsemaker
On ma, 2006-09-25 at 17:00 +, Jim Bray wrote: > 1) If I don't want to use UUIDs, but prefer labels or the time-honored > way, do I need to drop Ubuntu in favor of Debian or is there still a > choice in the matter? You can change it back of course :) > 2) Kernel doesn't boot when update-grub