Re: [Bug 452175] Re: Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2010-01-14 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 07:53:51AM -, Stefan Kost wrote: > This is still the case for 2.6.31-17-generic-pae (and non -pae). If > there is no fix comming it would rock if someone could tell us how to Diagnosing the why this is happening is proving difficult. No progress has been made on it yet

Re: [Bug 452175] Re: Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2009-12-04 Thread Kees Cook
Correct. To avoid this issue, you must either run 64bit, or on a system that has hardware support for the "NX" bit (check your BIOS, it is frequently disabled). -- Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452175 You received this bug notific

Re: [Bug 452175] Re: Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2009-11-12 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Sven Herzberg wrote: > I have a laptop with Fedora 12. On that machine, I have a debian-lenny > chroot. > > Within the chroot, I can reproduce the same behavior. > > Outside of it, I can't (because which is a binary here). > > # uname -a > Linux boober.fraggle 2.6.