era writes:
> Pardon a stupid question, but what would it take to get emacs23 in main?
> Installing the old version is likely to seem like overtly cautious in
> the eyes of some users.
17:23 @ftpmasters: will emacs23 be semi-"automatically"
be promoted to main and emacs22 demo
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 06:02:08PM -, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Is it possible to have the "emacs" package depend on emacs22 OR emacs23,
> and prefer emacs22 if neither is installed already, to avoid this?
No, that's contrary to the purpose of the 'emacs' package. If you want
emacs23 and not emac
StefanPotyra writes:
> (subscribing siretart as another source for information).
>
> Just to make it clear, I'm not opposing to get a newer emacs in in
> general (even though I'm a vi user :P). What's the state of emacs-
> snapshot right now? Is emacs23 newer? Should we drop emacs-snapshot (and
>
