* 2016-04-03 23:40 GMT+03:00 fyo wrote:
>
> That's not what the diff says. There is no change in ionice behavior in
> this patch. The patch removes --update from both branches of the if-
> statement.
Thanks for pinpointing that to me, fyo -- somehow I have mixed these
four lines (and --update + --
* 2016-04-02 23:43 GMT+03:00 fyo wrote:
>
>> fyo, do you mean this statement:
>
>> > - do not modify the DB "in-place" with --update to avoid
>> > software-center seeing a corrupted database when it has
>> > it open at the same time
>
> Yes, that appears to be the argument for removing --update, wh
* 2016-03-31 10:12 GMT+03:00 fyo wrote:
>
> Agree or disagree, you can see the reason for the WONT FIX here:
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/wily/apt-xapian-index/wily/revision/22
fyo, do you mean this statement:
> - do not modify the DB "in-place" with --update to avoid
>
okay guys. they're not going to look at the case or do anything if you keep
adding to a bug that was marked as fixed.
you need to start a new bug.
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:59:08 +
> From: siegert@gmail.com
> To: ad...@hotmail.com
> Subject: [Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index use
On 06/14/2011 05:13 PM, Robert Horswell wrote:
> Just happened to me. CPU up to 100%, and then my laptop temperature
> jumped to 96 degrees C, overheated, and shut itself off.
>
Reopen the bug. CPU overheating should is critical. Be sure to post your
details (Ubuntu version etc). You might use:
On 08/11/2010 09:00 PM, Rafael Gattringer wrote:
> Regression?
>
>From a new Maverick Alpha 3 install & using '$ sudo
update-apt-xapian-index':
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+COMMAND
10244 root 20 0 124m 96m 10m R 95.2 26.1 1:26.92
update-apt-xapi
95.2% cpu - 26
s2,
bash: alias: --portrait: not found
llh...@marcus:/$ sudo apt-get install apt-xapian-index
[sudo] password for llhull:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
apt-xapian-index is already the newest version.
The following packages were aut
* 2010/5/12 aexl wrote:
>
> i dont understand the aim of the discussion.
I and lavinog were discussing whether is there a bug in ionice
parameter's parsing :)
> when i do a patch then i dont rely on undocumented behaviour -
> it might change anytime.
aexl, that's OK :) and thank you for you cont
* 2010/5/12 lavinog :
>
> I don't think the space makes a difference:
> Without the space:
> ionice -p 3477
> idle
Here you've left the space.
> with the space:
> ionice -p 3525
> idle
The name of option which is said to have a difference is "-c", not
"-p". That surely may be bug in "ionice".
Il giorno gio, 28/05/2009 alle 19.06 +, Pelládi Gábor ha scritto:
> At least
> can somebody tell me why we need this background process at all? Can I
> uninstall it, without breaking functionality?
The program is described in apt-cache show as supporting the index of
packages that you see when
10 matches
Mail list logo
