It's "new" to the upstream bug tracker, bugzilla.gnome.org. Launchpad just
isn't very clear that that's what's happened here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274405
Title:
network mana
Sancho Panza wrote:
> @ hackel: 30-60 seconds is more like an average time. I have had instances
> when I had to wait a few minutes
> (despite using "iwlist scan" immediately on resuming from suspend or
> restarting network manager and networking daemons).
>
> @ Mat: I agree this may not be a de
YES, finally, you made my day!!!
I tried wicd in the past, but I didn't like it. Looks like it improved
quite a bit as it now works beautifully, and I'm reconnected within a
few seconds after resume.
Thanks!
Paul Bourke wrote:
> I have a theory that depsite the above comments that it may
If only more people like you would step forward... It's been bugging
me for a while, but it's as if we're a minority (even though intel
wifi cards are quite common these days).
Thanks.
Paul Bourke wrote:
> Id like to jump on this bug also.. am using the 'wl' wireless driver
> on Ubuntu In
Yes, I almost allways resume where I suspended. So it's not related to
the location. Sometime it will be reconnected when I'm finished typing
my password after resuming, sometime it will take ~30sec to reconnect.
Alexander Sack wrote:
> so seems like this flipped in 0.7 ...previously it was
Are you running a "fresh" install of Intrepid? Personnally, It's an
upgrade from Hardy, and I sometime wonder if a fresh install would
behave the same.
Blutack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is also an issue for the iwl3945 on a HP dv6000, and has been
> for every Ubuntu release I've ev
No, the computer is on my desk, and I just suspend/resume without
moving an inch.
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does this problem occur when you sleep your computer at one place and
> wake up at a different place (with different AP), or also if you wake up
> at the same AP?
>
> **
OK, thanks for this info.
Anybody else using iwl3945 that experience (or not) this problem?
Jeffrey Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Marc Jauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> According to 'modinfo iwl3945', the default is scanning enabled, and I
>> don't see
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Marc Jauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to 'modinfo iwl3945', the default is scanning enabled, and I
> don't see anywhere that overrides this, so I would think this is not
> the case. Do you have an easy way to check this?
>
You would know if it was dis
According to 'modinfo iwl3945', the default is scanning enabled, and I
don't see anywhere that overrides this, so I would think this is not
the case. Do you have an easy way to check this?
Jeffrey Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you happen to have hardware scanning disabled in your modu
10 matches
Mail list logo
