Stéphane Graber wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> It's in Debian now, could you check if it's safe to sync the package,
>> and if so, turn this into a sync request?
>
> Hi,
>
> It's perfectly safe as the packaging has been done in a common bzr branch.
great!
> I'm currently waiting for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> It's in Debian now, could you check if it's safe to sync the package,
> and if so, turn this into a sync request?
>
Hi,
It's perfectly safe as the packaging has been done in a common bzr branch.
I'm currently waiting fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> Julian, thanks for the heads up. The packaging for Intrepid is
>> essentially already obsolete.
>>
>> The most uptodate packaging is stored in https://code.launchpad.net
>> /~pastebinit-developer
Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Julian, thanks for the heads up. The packaging for Intrepid is
> essentially already obsolete.
>
> The most uptodate packaging is stored in https://code.launchpad.net
> /~pastebinit-developers/pastebinit/debian
>
Could you attach a new diff.gz then?
--
New pastebinit 0.
