Re: [Bug 222761] Re: [SRU] upsd doesn't start NOT 221737

2009-02-19 Thread Arnaud Quette
2009/2/18 Steve Beattie > I reproduced the problem with the original version of nut in the hardy > release, 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7, and confirmed that upgrading to the version > in hardy-proposed, 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2, corrected this issue. I also > verified that things work properly when: > > - upgradi

Re: [Bug 222761] Re: [SRU] upsd doesn't start NOT 221737

2008-06-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Arnaud Quette [2008-06-13 7:35 -]: > seconded. iirc, this fallback (nut already exist) should result in simply > checking if nut is already part of the dialout group (ie using a test -z > "getent group dialout | grep nut") and adding it if it's not. Please do "if groups nut | grep -qw dialout

Re: [Bug 222761] Re: [SRU] upsd doesn't start NOT 221737

2008-06-13 Thread Steve Beattie
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 06:32:27AM -, Martin Pitt wrote: > Steve, what was "the problem" when you tested upgrade? Did the upgrade > fail (i. e. did addgroup error out because the group already existed), > or was the problem that an already existing nut user isn't in some > important group? The

Re: [Bug 222761] Re: [SRU] upsd doesn't start NOT 221737

2008-06-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
2008/6/13 Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > if [ -z `getent group nut` ]; then > addgroup --quiet --system nut > -# else > -# printf "error: user \"nut\" already exists... see > /usr/share/doc/nut/README.Debian\n" && exit 1 > + else > +

Re: [Bug 222761] Re: [SRU] upsd doesn't start NOT 221737

2008-04-29 Thread Arnaud Quette
both! the aim is to keep nut in the nut group (which is the base for the framework to operate) and to add it to the dialout group to solve the need of user action for accessing serial devices. as I state in the README.Debian, USB devices access is already handled via udev... -- Arnaud -- [SRU]

Re: [Bug 222761] Re: [SRU] upsd doesn't start NOT 221737

2008-04-29 Thread Al Grimstad
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 07:41 +, Martin Pitt wrote: > Chuck, that looks much better already. However, the changelog says "nut > group", whereas the patch puts the nut user into dialout. Which one is > right and intended? This comment suggests that a fix to the problem is adding the user "nut" to