On 09/16/2009 05:38 PM, Michael Marley wrote:
> What kind of progress is being made on getting this ready for Karmic?
> Will a FFE be necessary?
>
Upstream has not completed this yet IIRC. We are waiting for
them to finish and we will roll it out on the release they fix
this on. not sure what we w
On 07/06/2009 01:57 PM, Michael Marley wrote:
> (In response to little OT)
>
> I don't know about officially, but I have some almost-final (post-RC2)
> builds of Firefox 3.5 for Jaunty in my PPA.
> https://edge.launchpad.net/~thefirstm/+archive/ppa
>
Jaunty should have final 3.5. The version in J
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Othmane Moustaouda wrote:
> Will there be Firefox 3.5 packages for Jaunty?
There has been for a while, "firefox-3.5". Currently it is a beta 4
build from late March (though is up to date in Karmic) but is planned
to be upgraded in the near future. Also if you want
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:59:17PM -, Michael Marley wrote:
> Will it be possible to compile Firefox with PGO for Karmic?
>
Yes, we have this on on our list. Contributions welcome.
- Alexander
--
Please compile Firefox with PGO optimizations
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213708
You rece
On 03/22/2009 10:17 PM, Craig wrote:
> I can't help but notice that, at the top, asac has marked that Jaunty
> won't be getting PGO for Xulrunner or Firefox 3.0 or 3.1/3.5. Is this
> true? Mozilla's Linux binaries are PGO enabled... isn't it good enough
> that upstream does it, as well as other dis
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:17:34 -
Craig wrote:
> Mozilla's Linux binaries are PGO enabled... isn't it good enough
> that upstream does it, as well as other distros?
Uh, Mozilla's Linux binaries are not PGO enabled.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418866 is the upstream bug
tracking
Please, then answer here too:
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/18058/
--
Please compile Firefox with PGO optimizations
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
2009/3/6 John Vivirito
> It would be best if upstream shipped with PGO however i'm sure we can
> but IMHO it would be best that way. You can ask asac in
> #ubuntu-mozillateam but i'm fairly sure he would rather it be done
> upstream.
>
Asac told me that he will try build debs with PGO enabled.
On 03/06/2009 11:39 AM, Surfaz Gemon Meme wrote:
> John, I don't understand what you want say.
>
> If Arch Linux has a Firefox with PGO, what problem are there in Ubuntu?
>
It would be best if upstream shipped with PGO however i'm sure we can
but IMHO it would be best that way. You can ask asac i
