Re: [Bug 201624] Re: [hardy] amule upnp needs libupnp2

2008-06-25 Thread Festor Wailon Dacoba
I already did that (in #amule IRC chanel). Kry's response was that the support of UPnP in aMule is far from perfect 2008/6/25 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Festor Wailon Dacoba wrote: > > Talk to Kry since it was he who added support UPnP in amule > > I think it's us who should fo

Re: [Bug 201624] Re: [hardy] amule upnp needs libupnp2

2008-06-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Festor Wailon Dacoba wrote: > Talk to Kry since it was he who added support UPnP in amule I think it's us who should forward bugs upstream and take care of them, and not users. -- [hardy] amule upnp needs libupnp2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201624 You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 201624] Re: [hardy] amule upnp needs libupnp2

2008-06-25 Thread Festor Wailon Dacoba
> > I get in the error log: > > 2008-06-25 12:07:39: UPnP.cpp(91): Universal Plug and Play: Successfully > opened libixml.so.2. > 2008-06-25 12:07:39: UPnP.cpp(87): Universal Plug and Play: > error(CDynamicLibHandle): Unable to dlopen libupnp.so.2. Check PATH and > LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > 2008-06-25 12:

Re: [Bug 201624] Re: [hardy] amule upnp needs libupnp2

2008-05-16 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
aldebx wrote: > Could it be that the maintainer compiled amule deb in a dirty > environment with both libupnp2 and libupnp3? Just guessing... No, as it's build in the Ubuntu buidds in clean chroots, and libupnp isn't needed on build as the library is dlopen()ed. I'm preparing an update to a new s