On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 02:14 +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >This could well be a regression (Why was the antivirus plugin version
> >allowed to change? isnt that against policy?), so i consider it worth
> >noting.
>
> It's because the old version of clamav that it uses had serious security
> iss
>This could well be a regression (Why was the antivirus plugin version
>allowed to change? isnt that against policy?), so i consider it worth
>noting.
It's because the old version of clamav that it uses had serious security issues
and wasn't
maintainable. The updated provided fixes for (IIRC) 1
