On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:37:34AM -, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>@Matthieu, @Dave, thanks for the comments and details.
>
>I'm not blocking work to land, the 20.10 SRU could be accepted now and I
>didn't revert in that serie.
>The SRU team tries to ensure the fix is in the new serie so it doesn'
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:11:23AM -, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>Sorry but I'm reverting that upload for now until the patches are
>properly upstreamed. We have been bitten too often by unforwarded
>changes that create issues or create maintainance burden over the years
>and we currently don't ha
I understand the logic of the of doing this and don't disagree.
However, as this is an entry level device and I believe the only true
64bit O/S advertised for this device, the fact that it does not not
work out of the box may impact on the perception of potential new
Ubuntu users?
Reading Tony's p
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:12:30PM -, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>Thanks for the work but it there any work to upstream those changes? I'm
>not happy to carry a sleep(1) hack in our package unless there is a
>strong reason and we are working on a way to replace it by a better
>solution
The change
Hi,
I implemented the fix detailed in the test case yesterday and the bug
still existed. I've double checked again this morning and done a
full-upgrade just to check nothing new was waiting and the bug still
exists on this Mate 20.10 install. Yesterday after applying the fix I
started getting rand
