Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb

2008-07-25 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, I was able to reproduce this error on one of my machines. It seems it *does* find v86d, as the error would have to more lines if it wouldn't: uvesafb: failed to execute /sbin/v86d uvesafb: make sure that the v86d helper is installed and executable uvesafb: Getting VBE info block failed (eax=0

Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb

2008-07-22 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:17:14 - Michael Sotnikov wrote: > $ apt-cache policy v86d > v86d: > Установлен: 0.1.5-1ubuntu2 > Кандидат: 0.1.5-1ubuntu2 > Таблица версий: > *** 0.1.5-1ubuntu2 0 > 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/statu

Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb

2008-07-18 Thread Evgeni Golov
hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:26:24 - Michael Sotnikov wrote: > I use default kernel (iterpid): > $ uname -a > Linux astar-laptop 2.6.26-4-generic #1 SMP Mon Jul 14 18:39:53 UTC 2008 i686 > GNU/Linux > > my config: > $ cat /boot/config-2.6.26-4-generic | grep VESA > CONFIG_FB_UVESA=m > # CONFI

Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb

2008-07-18 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:58:52 - Michael Sotnikov wrote: > 1. with current interpid kernel (2.6.26-4) vesafb isn't possible - it's > absent. It was replaced with uvesafb, which use another command (according to > documents) > In addition. After system load we can see that uvesafb was load

Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb

2008-07-18 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:14:53 - nullack wrote: > Problem 1: > > From within Intrepid if I unload and reload the module like so: > > sudo modprobe -r uvesafb > sudo modprobe uvesafb mode=1280x1024-32 > > It results in tty alignment being wrong (like its centre aligned not > left) Why do

Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb

2008-07-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:57:05 - Colin Watson wrote: > I've synced v86d into Ubuntu. We still need to review it for main and > probably get it into the minimal seed, or have the new kernel depend on > it, or both. It failed to build because your linux-libc-dev does not have a /usr/include/