[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2008-03-11 Thread Leann Ogasawara
Marking "Fix Released" as patch appears to be available in the Feisty kernel. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95921 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2008-02-11 Thread Leann Ogasawara
This bug report was marked "Fix Committed" a while ago but there hasn't been any recent activity. Can you just verify this bug has been resolved and we'll go ahead and mark this bug report as "Fix Released". Thanks in advance. -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-04-05 Thread Luís Silva
Well, the patch resolved the problem with UDMA and now my hard drive is detected as UDMA100 as expected... But in what relates to the "ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x000101f7" message, she's still there... :( -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://launchpad.net/bugs/95921 -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-04-05 Thread Giovanni Condello
Same issue here and same dmesg output (same laptop too?) -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://launchpad.net/bugs/95921 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-04-04 Thread Ben Collins
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium Assignee: (unassigned) => Ben Collins Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://launchpad.net/bugs/95921 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-04-01 Thread Giovanni Condello
Sent patch to launchpad ** Attachment added: "LKML patch which has been reported to work" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7097877/patch.patch -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://launchpad.net/bugs/95921 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-03-28 Thread Olivier Lacroix
Nice. are we supposed to let the devs know about it in any particular way ? ** Changed in: Ubuntu Sourcepackagename: None => linux-source-2.6.20 -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://launchpad.net/bugs/95921 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-03-28 Thread Luís Silva
Apparently there's already a patch that fixes this problem... I'm going to try it against kernel 2.6.21-rc5 in a few moments... The patch can be found here http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/47 -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://launchpad.net/bugs/95921 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-03-27 Thread Luís Silva
I too have been having some problems with a laptop (asus Z96J) since upgrade to feisty. Sometimes it takes for ages to boot... Other times it boots normally, but with a strange error in the logs (ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x000101f7)... I'm going to attach copies of dmesg (named dmesg.x.or

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-03-25 Thread Olivier Lacroix
I get the same problem. ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://launchpad.net/bugs/95921 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 95921] Re: UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used

2007-03-25 Thread Sascha
** Attachment added: "Complete dmesg output" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6932564/dmesg.txt -- UDMA 33 instead of UDMA 100 used https://launchpad.net/bugs/95921 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs