I also have an ATI Radeon card that requires the proprietary ATI fglrx
driver, and beryl won't work because of the missing beryl-xgl. I
downloaded beryl-xgl from a non-stadard repository to make things work.
That shouldn't be necessary.
Please fix this bug which has been known since at least Marc
I assigned this bug to motus.
** Changed in: beryl-core (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU
--
beryl-xgl missing from beryl and beryl-core (feisty)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
I can also confirm this PREVENTED me from using Beryl on ATI Radeon
x1600 on an AMD64.
Some have managed to make it work somehow:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2683529#post2683529
I, and probably the majority of average users around, just don't have
the time.
--
beryl-xgl missing fr
I can confirm this bug here (Xpress200M with fglrx, Xgl, Feisty).
I am holding the package to version 0.2.0 from the Beryl site for now,
but I have to say that this seems to me like a pretty serious bug for
people with ATI cards/chipsets.
--
beryl-xgl missing from beryl and beryl-core (feisty)
h
I can confirm issue with the ATI Radeon M22 driver, using both the fglrx and
tried using Milone's Evny installer.
here is the output from beryl-manager: (i hope this helps)
* Beryl system compatiblity check*
I made beyl working by compiling 0.2.1 version (0.3.0 works too, but
it's too buggy and crashes sometimes) with xgl support. Then:
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/fglrx/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa beryl --replace --use-
copy --force-xgl
Anyway, it's still buggy on my computer (laptop, radeon 200m, fglrx, xgl,
fei
I can confirm this bug on my Feisty for Amd64.
My gc is Nvidia GeForce4 MX 4000 (driver nvidia 9631, new legacy), the
only way to have a working beryl is to downgrade beryl-core (copy beryl-
xgl etc)
We need a solution
--
beryl-xgl missing from beryl and beryl-core (feisty)
https://bugs.launch
i have this problem too...the X server crashed when i rebooted after
updating beryl from the universe repository. im kinda new to linux, and
i didnt know what to do with a black screen, so i wiped my hard drive
and started over. I have an ATI Xpress 200M on my HP laptop, and i
really wish this bug
Another unfortunate user of ATI X1400.
Please fix this. ATI users are about 50%. If you want people to stay
with this distro, IMO this is not the way to go.
Note that this release of ubuntu is behaving very bad with us, starting
with the livecd installer not being able to start X using the vesa
d
I have this problem too. Very disappointing.
--
beryl-xgl missing from beryl and beryl-core (feisty)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
@spoilerhead: "beryl-xgl was removed from the package at the request of
the MOTU... I'll see if I can get it reinstated for a future release (as
I understand it, the problem was that it statically links against it's
own version of Mesa - linking against the version of mesa provided in
Ubuntu could
confirmed here
just downloaded the 0.2.0 debfile
(http://ubuntu.beryl-project.org/pool/feisty/main/0.2.0/beryl-core_0.2.0~0beryl1_i386.deb)
extracted beryl-xgl and laced it into /usr/bin fixes the problem for me
this bug certainly breaks beryl for all XGL users, and i think theres
quite a lot of
yes, I confirm this is really a bug. A new hint has been added to Ubuntu
Feisty installation guide on ATI card at Beryl Wiki. It said we should
download Beryl version to 0.2.0 and the Beryl(0.2.1) distributed by
Ubuntu conflict with XGL,
Hope this bug will be fixed soon.
--
beryl-xgl missing fro
Is anyone working on fixing this CRITICAL bug? ATi is about half of the
graphics cards out there: don't leave us in the dust. Xgl isn't legacy,
even some nvidia/ati driver users prefer it to AIGLX. Leaving it out of
the package is not a fix. Why can't we just sync from the beryl repos
where the pac
I also have a recent ATI card that is not supported by the free drivers
using AIGLX. So, the only way I can get it to work with either compiz
or beryl is with the XGL server. I can also report that this latest
beryl is broken for me using XGL and fglrx. Please expedite the fix.
--
beryl-xgl mi
The beryl-repo packages work great on my Macbook Pro, I hope the
packages are upgrade before Feisty is released.
--
beryl-xgl missing from beryl and beryl-core (feisty)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the b
Beryl-xgl is the only way to run Beryl for some ATI users (ie. me)
because their cards are not supported by the Radeon driver (ie. Radeon
Xpress 200M). Removing beryl-xgl from the package is a serious issue for
us.
--
beryl-xgl missing from beryl and beryl-core (feisty)
https://launchpad.net/bugs
I can conform that the beryl-repo packages work fantastic with my laptop
(radeon mobile x700 PCI-E) when using fglrx driver. Which I btw have to
use, as the free radeon/ati driver does not work at all with my grfx-
card+monitor (dead screen).
Hexion: thanks for the tip of how to hold packages, but
Alex, you can hold a package to avoid upgrading it with aptitude (and
apt-get I suppose)
In example, if you don't want to upgrade beryl, type:
# sudo aptitude hold beryl
Remember, when you want to upgrade it you can unhold it and upgrade OR just
install it:
# sudo aptitude unhold beryl
# sudo ap
Confirmed here. Beryl works great with packages from Beryl repos but
there is no beryl-xgl with these packages. I can have universe enabled
because I'm afraid I'll accidentally update. Please fix this, this is a
major bug for anyone with a recent ATI card.
--
beryl-xgl missing from beryl and bery
Hello everybody,
I can confirm this problem is also present in feisty amd64 as of today upgrade.
I have tried one of the workarounds suggested, that is to download
beryl-core-0.2.0 and extract and copy beryl-xgl to /usr/lib, but it doesn't
work: bertyl starts, but all windows of applications be
Will I ever be able to understand some MOTU's actions
"Well, we don't like the way this package is behaving let's fucking
BREAK it... Yeah, it's broken, we can go to bed proud of the good job
done"
Definition of FIX: Take something that doesn't work (or just works sometimes)
and make it
beryl-xgl was removed from the package at the request of the MOTU...
I'll see if I can get it reinstated for a future release (as I
understand it, the problem was that it statically links against it's own
version of Mesa - linking against the version of mesa provided in
Ubuntu could be a workable
** Summary changed:
- New beryl packages from Feisty offcial repos. don't work with Ati fglrx
driver + Xgl
+ beryl-xgl missing from beryl and beryl-core (feisty)
--
beryl-xgl missing from beryl and beryl-core (feisty)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95394
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
24 matches
Mail list logo
