Can you still reproduce this issue on a newer and supported Ubuntu
release?
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Title:
ope
** No longer affects: precise-backports
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Title:
openssl on 64bit is much slower than before
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
** Also affects: precise-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Title:
openssl on 64bit is much slower than before
To manage noti
Just checking in 3 months later. Any chance on getting some movement on
this for the next Precise update?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Title:
openssl on 64bit is much slower
Any decision on this?
The stopgap is not that hard. Disable ASM for 64bit and retest to see
the performance numbers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Title:
openssl on 64bit is
** Tags added: performance
** Description changed:
Posting output of openssl speed on precise alpha and 10.04. Some quick
googling seems to indicate issues with 64bit asm vs. the C version
(might be a good idea to disable 64bit asm). This is on a processor
- without AES-NI (which is still v
Can you post some numbers to compare? Post the output of "openssl
speed aes" for different scenarios at a minimum and specify your
processor type.
There should be a comparison of both 32bit to 64bit on precise (which is
what I think you are comparing) AND a comparison of ssl performance on
prec
Just a reference, I've seen something similar at bug 963420, but my
initial tests have not shown significant difference in i386 compared to
amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Here's a post that talks about the old assembly for 64bit x86.
http://zombe.es/post/405783/openssl-outmoded-asm
Performance is up to 50% worse for AES ciphers so I would think this is
a must fix.
Patch available for RC4 on x86_64.
http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Title:
openssl on 64bit is much slower than before
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openss
11 matches
Mail list logo
