This package is obsolete and has been removed from the archive. Closing
associated bugs.
** Changed in: powernowd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
This is not an appropriate way to declare a package "obsolete". If you
think a package should not be used, file a bug to get it removed from
the archive and *then* invalidate the bugs.
** Changed in: powernowd (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
cpu-scaling setup initscript should be
The powernowd package is obsolete, please do not use it. CPU frequency
scaling is now handled by the kernel, so if you still have issues on a
modern release, file a bug against the linux package.
** Changed in: powernowd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
cpu-scaling setup initscrip
Hi,
I agree with Cesare, for various reasons. First, it seems completely
unreasonable to use the init script to do something else than starting
the daemon. Secondly, if we are to belive [1] (and to this day I have
yet to find any compelling argument against these good practices), the
only sane def
Giuseppe,
for what I understand (and this is my own personal understanding) ubuntu is a
debian derived distribution. They try to have as much as common with Debian.
What you propose is indeed a deviation from this policy.
And every modification, no matter how silly and trivial, is going to intr
Cesare, why do you see this as a distribution policy issue? I see this
as a simple modification (split the powernowd pkg and add a /etc/default
file). Of course nothing forbids the user to modify its boot script,
but... you really think this is a clean approach? And - what such a
silly modification
Yup totally agree. And the name 'powernow' gets confused with AMD's
scaling technology.
Moving this to a new package called something like 'cpufreq-scaling' and
having a new '/etc/default/' configuration file with proper relevant
options needs to be done.
It's too late for Feisty, but perhaps we
