[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2014-12-16 Thread Andy Whitcroft
>From the descriptions above I am assuming this is fixed in current releases. Please reopen if that is not the case. ** Changed in: grub-gfxpayload-lists (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-08-19 Thread Lucazade
this fix is no more needed in Quantal.. it is necessary to install xserver-xorg-video-modesetting and there are no more conflicts with vt.handoff and plymouth. Is it possible to include this package in the default installation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-07-22 Thread nicklasb
I tried the package on an existing installation, and it seems to have solved my problems as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To m

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-06-19 Thread Lucazade
any eta for integration in ubuntu repositories? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-06-02 Thread Lucazade
@apw reinstalled kubuntu 12.04 from scratch and then, after first bootup, I've applied your package. It fixes completely the startup process and there is no need of manual tuning like in the past.. really thanks... btw I don't know if gma500_gfx, included in kernel 3.4, will work well with vt.

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-06-02 Thread Lucazade
@apw going to try it today.. I was really busy this period! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-29 Thread Andy Whitcroft
@lucazade -- any luck with testing this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.la

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-23 Thread James M. Leddy
Additionally, these PCIIDs should be added to cover cedarview machines: v8086d0bef.* v8086d0bee.* v8086d0bed.* v8086d0bec.* v8086d0beb.* v8086d0bea.* v8086d0be9.* v8086d0be8.* v8086d0be7.* v8086d0be6.* v8086d0be5.* v8086d0be4.* v8086d0be3.* v8086d0be2.* v8086d0be1.* v8086d0be0.* -- You received

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-23 Thread Andy Whitcroft
@lucazade -- sounds great thanks ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launch

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-23 Thread Lucazade
@Andy Whitcroft (apw) thanks for the testing package.. going to try it as soon as I go back home on my Acer751h. Yes, I believe 8108 and 8109 are enough for the poulsbo chipsets out there.. they are for the gma500, the others are for gma600 and Medfield variants (usually not netbook but embedded

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~apw/ubuntu/precise/grub-gfxpayload-lists/lp914311 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-22 Thread Andy Whitcroft
@bodhi -- interesting ... i will make sure we only do this for precise then, assuming the testing is positive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-22 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Ok. I have put together a test package to disable vt handoff by default for the Pulsbough based systems. If those of you who are affected by this could reinstate the normal grub configuration and install the packages at the URL below and see if they correctly disable vt handoff for you. Please r

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-22 Thread bodhi.zazen
Andy - Thank you for following through on this. Please note that this may well be resolved on kernel 3.4 (it is for me and many others). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: v

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-22 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: grub-gfxpayload-lists (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Whitcroft (apw) ** Changed in: grub-gfxpayload-lists (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: grub-gfxpayload-lists (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => High ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assign

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-22 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Ahh didn't see the previous list. Can we confirm all of those are affected, or should we start with just the 8108 and 8109. ** Also affects: grub-gfxpayload-lists (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-05-22 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Ok in the latest precise kernels this flag will be removed automatically for any blacklisted device. As pulsbough cannot handle handoff this will need adding to the blacklists. Can someone supply a list of affected PCI ids so we can get this added. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-04-22 Thread Anthony Wong
** Tags added: blocks-hwcert-enablement -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.lau

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-04-11 Thread Lucazade
list of PCI IDs for psb_gfx module: $ modinfo psb_gfx filename: /lib/modules/3.0.0-19-generic-pae/kernel/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gfx.ko license:GPL description:drm driver for the Intel GMA500 author: Intel Corporation srcversion: C313C6C303ECDA07557A56D alias:

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-04-10 Thread Andy Whitcroft
We believe that the recent grub2 changes will have allowed this not to be specified when the card is marked as blacklisted. As PSB does not work with that we should get it added to the grub blacklist. For that you will need the PCI IDs for all of the affected cards. -- You received this bug not

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-04-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Marking Invalid for upstream task only as vt.handoff is a downstream only kernel parameter. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Tags removed: kernel-request-3.2.0-20.33 ** Also affects: linux Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-04-01 Thread Lucazade
@penalvch attached my /var/log directory with vt.handoff enabled.. I haven't found any clear evidence of the issue in the logs. that's why i've attached the whole dir. ** Attachment added: "log.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/914311/+attachment/2980548/+files/log.

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Brad Figg
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue. However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all. Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request further testing. This is s

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Low => High ** Tags added: kernel-key -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Tags added: precise ** Tags added: i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Lucazade, thank you for testing both Precise and Mainline. Could you please attach a faulty boot up log with vt.handoff=7 enabled following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelBoot ? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Description changed: When using a gma500 based netbook with psb_gfx driver (shipped by default with kernel => 3.x) - if the option "vt.handoff=7" is enabled (by default) the psb_gfx driver cannot initialize itself correctly ending up in a blank screen instead of X. + if the option "vt.hand

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Lucazade
@penalvch I've already provided logs for the kernel, already tried nightly iso image and already tried mainline kernels. There are 11 other persons affected (and other hundred affected present in the gma500 megathread in the ubuntu forum). Jus tell me what else I need to do instead of changing t

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-28 Thread Lucazade
already pushed the necessary logs.. bug is confirmed, it affects a lot of people.. I'd say all the gma500 owners. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-25 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Lucazade, thank you for reporting this and helping make Ubuntu better. This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from h

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-24 Thread bodhi.zazen
Any update on this bug ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-03-01 Thread James M. Leddy
** Tags added: rls-mgr-p-tracking -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-02-24 Thread James M. Leddy
** Tags added: gma500 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-01-11 Thread Lucazade
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-01-11 Thread Lucazade
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected oneiric running-unity staging ** Description changed: When using a gma500 based netbook with psb_gfx driver (shipped by default with kernel => 3.x) if the option "vt.handoff=7" is enabled (by default) the psb_gfx driver cannot initialize i

[Bug 914311] Re: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver

2012-01-10 Thread Phillip Susi
** Package changed: grub (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914311 Title: vt.handoff 7 breaks psb_gfx driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: http