We never touch /dists/precise/ after release (barring legal action, at
least). If this is going to happen then it will have to be associated
with a stable release update (possibly without source changes) to netcf
so that we can move it in precise-{proposed,updates}, and presumably if
this is at al
Thanks a lot for your great work.
Is it possible to make the same move for Precise? Precise being LTS will be
much longer around than Quantal.
We would really appreciate it if netcf could be moved to main for 12.04.1 as it
was planned originally
Any thoughts?
--
You received this bug notific
Moved to main.
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR] netcf
To manage notifications ab
Based on my previous assessment and that 'make check' cannot be run on
the buildd, ACK.
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu Quantal)
Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug not
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu Quantal)
Assignee: Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR] netcf
To manage not
0.2.0-1ubuntu1 has been pushed to quantal. I've built a libvirt in ppa
(ppa:serge-hallyn/virt) linked against it, which is working (virsh
iface-list works).
Ping on MIR?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
(Note that per comment #18, since netlink is apparently not supported in
buildd/ppa, tests cannot be run and will therefore be disabled. I will
however run them on my own system before pushing.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
2.0 was released today. I will start on the debian and ubuntu packages
on monday.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR] netcf
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Also affects: netcf (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu Quantal)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04.1 => ubuntu-12.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
I've spoken with upstream maintainers and Laine stated that once he's
back from vacation (~July 9th) he will put together a release.
I'll keep in touch with him to make sure this stays on his radar.
Thanks,
Adam
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
+1 for 0.2.0 release. It seems the git repo has Serge's changes; what
would prevent an 0.2.0 release at this point? It seems like:
netcf MIR blocks libvirt build with netcf; the libvirt bug is getting a
lot of attention from users, but this bug is the real linchpin for that
issue. (Once 0.2.0 i
As soon as upstream releases 0.2.0, that will include the libnl3
support. Given comment #22's explanation of the testcase failures in
builders, I believe that with the 0.2.0 package we should be ready for
main. (hoping :)
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: netcf
Availability: C
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-12.04.1
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR
Quoting Hendrik Schwartke (hend...@os-t.de):
> Hi Serge,
> there are quite some important features of libvirt that can't be used without
> netcf.
> So I think it would be a great benefit for virtualisation with ubuntu if
> libvirt is linked to netcf.
>
> So is there anything I can do to support
Hi Serge,
there are quite some important features of libvirt that can't be used without
netcf.
So I think it would be a great benefit for virtualisation with ubuntu if
libvirt is linked to netcf.
So is there anything I can do to support you?
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
In nl.c:117 the nl_connect call tries to create a netlink socket: sk->s_fd =
socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW | flags, protocol);
(protocol is NETLINK_ROUTE).
This calls returns ENOENT (22). So It seems that the ppa environment doesn't
support netlink.
Unfortunately it's necessary to call setup and t
Thanks, Hendrik, that makes sense.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR] netcf
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ne
Hi Serge,
Ralf asked me to inspect this testsuite bug. I'm not done yet but it seems that
there is a problem with libnl.
The cause of problem is the nl_connect_call in netlink_init in
src/dtuil_linux.c:806, which returns a nonzero value.
So far I don't know why, but I will have a closer look a
Quoting Ralf Spenneberg (904...@bugs.launchpad.net):
> Hi Serge,
>
> is there anything we can help from the outside? Unfortunately we do not
> have access to the Ubuntu build system. We need netcf in libvirt for our
> environment and would gladly offer some time to push this ahead.
The testsuite
Hi Serge,
is there anything we can help from the outside? Unfortunately we do not
have access to the Ubuntu build system. We need netcf in libvirt for our
environment and would gladly offer some time to push this ahead.
Thanks,
Ralf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Quoting Adam Stokes (adam.sto...@canonical.com):
> Hi Serge,
>
> Curious if you made any progress on this? If not, I'd like to try and
> help get this building if you are being spread thin from other action
> items.
I haven't. Help would be greatly appreciated :)
-serge
--
You received this
Hi Serge,
Curious if you made any progress on this? If not, I'd like to try and
help get this building if you are being spread thin from other action
items.
Thanks,
Adam
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Still not working. Presumably the Makefile looks different when created
on the buildds, so that the
sed -i 's/cat $$@-t >>$$@;/\0 \\\necho X;pwd;ls -ld test-
debian.log; cat test-debian.log;echo X; /' tests/Makefile
done in override_dh_auto_config, which works in my sbuilds, does
Quoting Jamie Strandboge (ja...@ubuntu.com):
> I'm afraid I don't have the debhelper incantation OTOH to give you. With
> libvirt I have been known to patch a test case to output that it failed, but
> return 0. Eg, from 9008-fix-daemon-conf-ftbfs.patch in lucid's libvirt:
> -wait $pid || fail=1
>
I'm afraid I don't have the debhelper incantation OTOH to give you. With
libvirt I have been known to patch a test case to output that it failed, but
return 0. Eg, from 9008-fix-daemon-conf-ftbfs.patch in lucid's libvirt:
-wait $pid || fail=1
+#wait $pid || fail=1
+# warn, but do not fail since U
We are currently in the process of building a webbased gui for the management
of virtual machines via libvirt. It would be greate if netcf is included in
libvirt, because then the creation of vlans and bridges connected to these
vlans could be handled via libvirt.
Please link libvirt to netcf.
Would I do this by simply patching the test case to return 0? Or is
there a magic DEB_ flag I can set for that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR] netcf
To manage no
What if instead you just have the tests run, but not fail the build?
Ideally we would have arm fail the build and i386/amd64 not fail the
build. I think it is important to have the tests run on i386/amd64 so
that people can notice problems before uploading. These would also be
useful when comparing
Given that there is only a single test for netcf itself (the rest are
gnulib tests), and i can't reproduce the failures anywhere except in our
buildds for amd64 and i386, i'm at a loss for how to try to have part of
the testsuite run.
Should I have 'make check' only run on arm, where they pass? T
Thanks, Jamie. New version uploaded will run make check at each build.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR] netcf
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
Looks fine to me. Builds ok with just main, looks maintainable, no
security issues, packaging looks good. Would be good to have a man page
for /usr/bin/ncftool, but that won't hold up this MIR. Since these
commands will be running as root, I spotted checked the code, and memory
allocations, etc see
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR]
** Changed in: netcf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR] netcf
To manage notifications about this b
netcf for libvirt is also required for virt-manager to enumerate
networks properly without the use of HAL...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904014
Title:
[MIR] netcf
To manage notifi
34 matches
Mail list logo
