[Expired for ifupdown (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8901
> And, last but not least. It's Ubuntu's decision to implement
> upstart, please do that the right way without introducing
> regressions.
A change in behavior is not a regression. The supported way to bring
the interfaces down and up again is to use 'ifup' and 'ifdown', not to
use the init script
I agree that ifup/ifdown is more specific and preferable. However, in
this situation it's a script that arranges networking for Openpanel
(www.openpanel.com). Also, 'restart networking' would make sense if it
actually did restart it, and not only start interfaces. And, last but
not least. It's Ubun
/etc/init/networking.conf is from the ifupdown package, not from
upstart. Reassigning.
> So if you restart networking, a second default route can be added. Which isn't
> what you'd expect.
"ifup -a" for an interface that's already known by ifupdown to be up
should have no effect. Is there some