** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gaim
- Upgrading 2.0 beta5 to beta6 seems to have introduces various problems. Most
of them seem to stem from the fact that all account references that have been
created using the old "oscar" protocol are now names "icq". The most serious
pro
updated version uploaded:
gaim (1:2.0.0+beta6-1ubuntu2) feisty; urgency=low
.
* debian/rules:
- Depends rather than Suggests libgadu3 (Ubuntu: #88647)
--
2.0 beta6: various problems because oscar->icq
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88647
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
I'm inclined to agree with Fionn, but it's probably an issue for Ari,
the maintainer of this package in Debian.
--
2.0 beta6: various problems because oscar->icq
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88647
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
Not using a Depends is a Maintainer decision, not a bug, there is no
reason to force everybody to install that lib when only few users need
it. The gaim package "Suggests" it which indicates it can be useful
** Changed in: gaim (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Status: Unconfirmed =>
Do you have libgadu3 installed?
--
2.0 beta6: various problems because oscar->icq
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88647
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Oh yes, I forgot to mention this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tmp] dpkg-architecture
DEB_BUILD_ARCH=i386
DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS=linux
DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU=i386
DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=i486
DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=linux-gnu
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=i486-linux-gnu
DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386
DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS=linux
DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU=i386
DE
I guess my deb is as official as it can get. Please see the attached
screenshot. It also includes the "add account" dialogue windows and
shows the list of available protocols. No Gadu-Gadu here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tmp] d gaim
ii gaim 2.0.0+beta6
Do you use the official package, on what architecture? The account
configuration dialog lists the protocol correctly on feisty i386
--
2.0 beta6: various problems because oscar->icq
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88647
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.co
I am not quite sure how all that works, because actually some of the
buddies reappeared shortly after, some did not which is why I just
rebuilt the whole list.
--
2.0 beta6: various problems because oscar->icq
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88647
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
Interesting... the buddies should all be stored on the server, and it
shouldn't really matter if Gaim can't find them in your local blist.xml,
they should have been re-added based on the information in your server
list.
I don't know where the Gadu-Gadu protocol went :-) It IS still
distributed wi
Yeah sure, all buddies that were tied to the "oscar" accounts were
dropped, because they were saved in the blist.xml like
which is no longer a valid protocol. I restored the buddy list from my
backup and replaced all "oscar" strings with "icq" before I restarted.
While I am at it: where did the
Ideally fundamental changes like this would be transparent to the user.
Someone should let the OTR project know about the problem you
mentioned...
Can you list any other problems you had?
--
2.0 beta6: various problems because oscar->icq
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88647
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
12 matches
Mail list logo
