Looks like this is a bug in /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindQt4.cmake.
It expects all Qt4 modules to be in a subdirectory of QT_LIBRARY_DIR,
but phonon hasn't been multi-arched yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
This bug was fixed in the package pyside - 1.0.6.1-2ubuntu1
---
pyside (1.0.6.1-2ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low
* debian/patches/force-phonon.patch:
Force the addition of the phonon directory to the CMake files.
(LP: #832864)
* debian/control: Ubuntu 11.10 only has debhelpe
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/pyside
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864
Title:
pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
I spoke with one of the phonon developers (who's also a Kubuntu dev) and
he felt the problem was that the phonon detection in pyside was wrong.
Unless Odyx says otherwise, we want the latest pyside stack (FFe
approved).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
On Sep 05, 2011, at 09:14 PM, Didier Raboud wrote:
>>From the upstream IRC chan, today:
>
> OdyX`, I have confirmed the problem is related with cmake + phonon
>dev package
> I suggest to you create a patch that always add the phonon dir on
>CMakeList file
> until we get this problem fixed on pho
>From the upstream IRC chan, today:
OdyX`, I have confirmed the problem is related with cmake + phonon dev
package
I suggest to you create a patch that always add the phonon dir on
CMakeList file
until we get this problem fixed on phonon-dev package
I will prepare such a -2+o1 package and up
On Sep 02, 2011, at 06:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>If pyside still doesn't have any rdepends, I think we're should just go with
>the latest.
There are rdeps in the stack:
Package: python-pyside.qtcore
Reverse Depends:
python-pyside.qtcore:i386,python-pyside.qtcore
python-pyside.qtxml,py
If pyside still doesn't have any rdepends, I think we're should just go with
the latest.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864
Title:
pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiri
One more thing: if this does manage to hack around the problem, then we
still have the decision of whether to upgrade to a newer PySide and
dependencies. My suspicion is that the same hack will get PySide 1.0.4
building too so an upgrade would not strictly be necessary. Scott, do
you have an opin
A bit more information:
In PySide/CMakeLists.txt, if you replace the line that says
HAS_QT_MODULE(QT_PHONON_FOUND phonon)
with
add_subdirectory(phonon)
then you get the
-- Checking for VideoCaptureDevice in phonon -- found
line, and it appears to build phonon (I haven't tested it all the way
** Changed in: pyside (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-1 => ubuntu-11.10-beta-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864
Title:
pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in
Didier, could you take a look at PySide/phonon/CMakeLists.txt and tell
me what the top of the file says. Here's what I've got:
project(phonon)
# workaround for a cmake bug under MacOSX, it finds phonon but not the include
path
if (NOT QT_PHONON_INCLUDE_DIR AND CMAKE_HOST_APPLE)
set(QT_PHONO
On Sep 02, 2011, at 02:21 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>Looking at the Debian build log I see it says:
>
>-- Checking for VideoCaptureDevice in phonon -- found
>
>during configure and yours doesn't. I checked and libphonon-dev has the
>same VideoCaptureDevice headers in both distros, so no idea wha
Looking at the Debian build log I see it says:
-- Checking for VideoCaptureDevice in phonon -- found
during configure and yours doesn't. I checked and libphonon-dev has the
same VideoCaptureDevice headers in both distros, so no idea what's up
there.
--
You received this bug notification becaus
On Sep 02, 2011, at 09:32 AM, Didier Raboud wrote:
>FYI, I have just uploaded "backported" packages targetted at oneiric to the
>"official PySide PPA":
>https://launchpad.net/~pyside/+archive/ppa/+packages We'll see what gets out
>of that.
Great, thanks Didier. I uploaded my own local build lo
** Attachment added: "pyside_1.0.6.1-2~test0_amd64.build"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyside/+bug/832864/+attachment/2344032/+files/pyside_1.0.6.1-2%7Etest0_amd64.build
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
FYI, I have just uploaded "backported" packages targetted at oneiric to the
"official PySide PPA":
https://launchpad.net/~pyside/+archive/ppa/+packages We'll see what gets out of
that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Build log?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864
Title:
pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
I've built the Debian sid stack of packages, and PySide still doesn't
build phonon.so, so something else must clearly be going on.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864
Title:
pyside
** Changed in: pyside (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry)
** Changed in: pyside (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-11.10-beta-1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
On Aug 31, 2011, at 03:19 PM, Didier Raboud wrote:
>@barry: debhelper is needed because of multiarch, that can easily be
>backported. In fact the PPA reverts everything multiarch-related.
Thanks for the help Didier. I think it's worth at least giving the sync a
try. I'll work on that and see ho
@barry: debhelper is needed because of multiarch, that can easily be
backported. In fact the PPA reverts everything multiarch-related.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864
Title:
pys
@ScottK: given where we are in the release cycle, doesn't it make more
sense to try to fix the immediate problem rather than sync a bunch of
new packages? debhelper is the most worrying one.
The problem appears to be that phonon.so doesn't get built so there's
nothing to install, and the d/python
Some data points:
a) if you want to sync from Debian, you need apiextractor, generatorrunner and
shiboken
b) you don't need to run the full build to see if it will succeed, running one
(of the 4) configure is enough.
c) I'm maintaining the same packages for PySide "upstream" on
lucid+maverick+n
My local build finally ended, confirming the failure in the original
posting. Unfortunately, Chromium decided just then was a good time to
lock the machine, so I lost my session. I'll start another build now so
I can take a closer look at the problem in the morning. I guess I'll
take this opport
Yes. One has to do the set.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864
Title:
pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
Not syncable (pyside is a twisted heap of dependencies :) ):
After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied:
debhelper(inst 8.9.0ubuntu1 ! >= wanted 8.9.3~) shiboken(inst 1.0.4-2 ! >=
wanted 1.0.6) libshiboken-dev(inst 1.0.4-2 ! >= wanted 1.0.6) shiboken-dbg(inst
1.0.4
If this can be solved with a sync, I'd do that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864
Title:
pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric
To manage notifications about this bug
(this is way off topic for the bug, but wth). Launchpad uses an internal
fork of sbuild from ages ago (before the apt/aptitude resolvers) which
is why the internal resolver is closer to launchpad. Debian uses the
aptitude resolver on most buildds, and apt on some.
Yeah, I'm still building it too..
On Aug 30, 2011, at 08:57 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>Hrm, I generally find sbuild's internal resolver to be the closest to
>Launchpad buildds. In this case, the internal resolver works fine
>(sbuild 0.62.5-1)
Here's what the sbuild(1) manpage says about the internal resolver:
--build-dep-
Hrm, I generally find sbuild's internal resolver to be the closest to
Launchpad buildds. In this case, the internal resolver works fine
(sbuild 0.62.5-1)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8
Building this has been a challenge. Both pbuilder and sbuild fail on
the libphonon-dev build-dep, e.g.:
│ Install pyside build dependencies (apt-based resolver) │
└──┘
Installing build dependencies
32 matches
Mail list logo
