I have no further news about the package and for printing I do not see
any necessity for this package. We must ask the people working on
monitor calibration.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
What is the status of this MIR? Is it still required to provide some
feature?
Changes were requested, they don't appear to be all done, but I wouldn't
necessarily block on needing to use something other than JAM if the
maintainability of the pacakge is good.
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Current version is 2.0.1:
- Still uses JAM build system
- Finally switched to libusb 1.0.0
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8
[Expired for argyll (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Till, please could you update that for 2018?
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-1 => None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To m
I had a look in current Argyll package in Ubuntu (1.6.3-4) and found
following:
GOOD:
- Packaging less complex as upstream build system is used now.
BAD:
- Exotic JAM build system used by upstream.
- Still uses deprecated libusb 0.1.x, needs to get ported to 1.0.x, preferably
by upstream.
--
> Argyll is currently orphaned in Debian.
Fwiw, this package has a Debian maintainer again now, which as uploaded
several newer versions of the package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Keep me posted Chris!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/argyll/+bug/82
It's probably worth holding off on any MIR review; Argyll is currently
orphaned in Debian.
I'm pondering whether or not to adopt it. Until I decide, I've uploaded
a colord that doesn't build-depend on argyll.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To manage notifications about this bug
I just uploaded a symbols file for this to Debian. Would someone please
re-review this MIR? colord is now in dep-wait in utopic-proposed for
argyll.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
RAOF, when I was packaging Ghostscript 9.06, I added a build dependency
on libicc-dev (in error as it turned out later) and this raised the
discussion of MIRing Argyll to Main again. Especially we found out that
the Argyll package improved a lot (especially dropped the jam build
system) and only ne
Reopening this MIR for quantal, as we've un-split the packages (by
syncing from Debian), and they look much saner now.
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
I have separated the sources packages argyll and libicc2 again and now
only libicc2 should go to Main: bug 824032
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
Embedding a system library like libusb is a big blocker. That should be
fixed before this enters main.
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
I have uploaded a new version of the Argyll package (0ubuntu3). I have
removed the wrongly installed files /usr/lib/*.la and
/usr/bin/License.txt and I have also added a symbols file for the
libicc2 binary package, but I could not pass the argyll package over to
use the system libusb. The included
Argyll needs jam for building. MIR for jam is bug 823570.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchp
I will fix these issues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/argyll/+bug
Blocking issues with the package:
* No .symbols file for libicc2
* argyll installs /usr/bin/License.txt
* libicc-dev ships a .la file
* Uses built-in libusb instead of system one
Additionally, but not a blocker, it would be nice to see a bug
subscriber.
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
S
Till, one thing I can see already is that libicc2 should have a .symbols
file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Michael Terry (mterry)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To manage notifications abou
libicc2 will be included as a basic library for color-managed
applications.
Original description:
The icclib is a set of routines which implement the reading and
writing of color profile files that conform to the International
Color Consortium (ICC) Profile Format Specification, Version 3.4.
I
Conclusion of today's desktop team meeting is taking this package into
main but not installing the main binary (argyll) onto the Desktop CD,
due to its size. It will be optionally installable.
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification bec
didrocks, the argyll package does not contain ICC profiles. Do you know
what could be split into an argyll-extra binary package from the argyll
binary package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
didrocks, we could put argyll into main, but only install libicc2 on the
CD and have argyll optionally installable. libicc2 is a basic library
for color-managed environments. Ghostscript would use that library if
present for example.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
didrocks, the 300kB come from Richard Hughes, author of colord. Probably
he did not take into account the ICC profiles.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To m
didrocks, should I perhaps split out the ICC profiles into an extra
package to get at least the libicc and the calibration engine into main?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
As we already discussed on IRC, and after discussing with Martin and Seb, we
can't ship profiles in ubuntu:
this package is 13Mb compressed (far from the 300 kB announced for the full
stack). For the rest of the stack, it's 500kB, not sure how you get this
"300kB" value which is in any case far
** Changed in: argyll (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821883
Title:
[MIR] argyll
To manage notifications about this bug
31 matches
Mail list logo
