[Bug 81408] Re: dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban

2007-11-08 Thread cornbread
maybe this should be upgraded i am having the same issue... Please point to .deb package of 6.1+? -- dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 81408] Re: dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban

2007-08-30 Thread Soren Hansen
So in summarty this wasn't a bug, but a misconfiguration. Rejecting accourdingly. ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 81408] Re: dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban

2007-01-25 Thread Sylvain
ok I should have set minus one by reflex. Hum ok thanks for the advice I will maybe upgrade. Sylvain -- dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban https://launchpad.net/bugs/81408 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 81408] Re: dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban

2007-01-25 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
> >and that is with the same config file as it comes with edgy? >what was > >bantime value option set to? > it was set to -1. Yes it worked with the edgy conf file. I have not tested > dapper conf with edgy fail2ban. interesting permanent banning was added in 0.6.1: - Added permanent banning. Set

[Bug 81408] Re: dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban

2007-01-25 Thread Sylvain
>and that is with the same config file as it comes with edgy? >what was >bantime value option set to? it was set to -1. Yes it worked with the edgy conf file. I have not tested dapper conf with edgy fail2ban. Ok i understand that. Why not trying to ake the last stable version of fail2ban and to m

Re: [Bug 81408] Re: dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban

2007-01-25 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
> No the ip was filled. The problem is that when an ip is banned a few > seconds after it's unban. and that is with the same config file as it comes with edgy? what was bantime value option set to? > Ok so just put the edgy one under dapper. You are supposed to provide a long > term support so t

[Bug 81408] Re: dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban

2007-01-25 Thread Sylvain
No the ip was filled. The problem is that when an ip is banned a few seconds after it's unban. Yes, the deb from edgy repositorie solved the problem. Ok so just put the edgy one under dapper. You are supposed to provide a long term support so to have fully operationnel system for three years. T