** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Accepted into dapper-updates, thank you!
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
debdiff glibc_2.3.6-0ubuntu20.3.dsc
glibc_2.3.6-0ubuntu20.4.dsc
diff -u glibc-2.3.6/debian/changelog glibc-2.3.6/debian/changelog
--- glibc-2.3.6/debian/changelog
+++ glibc-2.3.6/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+glibc (2.3.6-0ubuntu20.4) dapper-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * No change upload to pro
** Tags added: verification-done
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Fix regression tested and approved for dapper-updates. Please upload it
on 2 February 2007.
Thanks.
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bug
Accepted into dapper-proposed.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed
** Tags removed: regression
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Upload to dapper-proposed done. Subbed ubuntu-archive to process the
source.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Debdiff approved for dapper-proposed, please go ahead and upload, and
set to 'in progress'.
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
The problem can affect dapper too.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Dapper)
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: (unassigned) => Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-b
Fixed in feisty and edgy.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Fix Released
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Was wondering. what is the common denominator in people that have the
libs, I have a couple of SW packages installed (but not on Oct 25 that I
remember when the two libs link were created...)
Examples:
vmware-server (had to install build essential for this to compile new
kernel mod)
Cou
I have attached the output of zgrep pthread /var/log/dpkg.log* to see if
it can help.
** Attachment added: "zgrep output"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5852030/pkg.txt
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
FYI, I did an update and then installed, and now I get these messages
but they're warnings and the packages installed properly.
I'm going to delete these symlinks on my system and see if I can figure
out what is using them (if something doesn't work anymore after I delete
them then I guess I know!
I checked /var/lib/dpkg/info, grepping for libc.so, and no hits.
Those symlinks were created on Nov 10. I created temp files with
timestamps at the beginning and end of the hour they were created, and
did a find for all files between those stamps. The only hits were those
symlinks and some tempo
It would be better to search the entire system, as it is entirely
possible that the file was not created by a .deb, whether official or
unofficial.
if you find something using that type of search, it's easy to determine
whether it came from a package after the fact.
--
libc6 update for Edgy fail
** Attachment added: "Output of the above command (Three files zipped)"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5845534/libsearchoutput.tar.gz
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
I enabled the commented out repos (IBM ones) ran an update and is now
running the following command for all three files:
for p in `dpkg -l | awk {' print $2 '};`; do echo "Doing $p now"; dpkg-
query -L $p | grep "libc.so.6" ;done > libc.so.6.output &
replacing libc.so.6 with
ld-linux.so.2
and
l
You could also try a brute-force approach of grepping all binaries on
your system to search for this string. if we can find out where these
files come from, we can warn other users about the potential for
problems.
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/811
> Did you at one point have other repositories enabled?
Yes... I have a local repository that contains a couple of IBM internal debs
and alienated debs from elsewhere as well as a temp link (comment out) of an
Internal IBM repositories...
The check for local debs returned a blank (see attachmen
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:47:34PM -, Paul Smith wrote:
> dpkg -S was the very first thing I did but:
> ~$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/libc.so.6
> dpkg: /usr/lib/libc.so.6 not found.
>
> The link might have been created by some post-install script.
>
> Matt: which package list are you referring to? I d
** Attachment added: "dapper proposed debdiff"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5844837/81125-dapper.debdiff
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
Paul Smith wrote:
> dpkg -S was the very first thing I did but:
> ~$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/libc.so.6
> dpkg: /usr/lib/libc.so.6 not found.
>
> The link might have been created by some post-install script.
Paul could you be so kind to do a grep in /var/lib/dpkg/info to see
if you can figure out what cr
dpkg -S was the very first thing I did but:
~$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/libc.so.6
dpkg: /usr/lib/libc.so.6 not found.
The link might have been created by some post-install script.
Matt: which package list are you referring to? I don't have any of the
extra packages you listed installed on my box so you
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:00:25PM -, Lorenco Trichardt wrote:
> If I search for libdl.so.2 ld-linux.so.2 inside the deb's in my apt cache I
> get the following:
All of those are normal and in the correct locations.
--
- mdz
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://laun
** Description changed:
The preinst script in libc6 (and variants) contains a sanity check which
is designed to locate improperly-installed components of glibc. Upon
finding such a component, it aborts installation of the package.
- The system is not harmed in any way. The only negative
If I search for libdl.so.2 ld-linux.so.2 inside the deb's in my apt cache I get
the following:
libdl.so.2
*
Doing libc6_2.4-1ubuntu12.2_i386.deb now
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-01-22 21:54 ./lib/libdl.so.2 -> libdl-2.4.so
Doing libc6-dev_2.4-1ubuntu12.2_i386.deb now
lrwxrwxrwx roo
Lorenco: the packages mentioned by mdz are not in the sources.list you
provided. Did you at one point have other repositories enabled?
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
The attached list of installed packages includes the following third-
party software:
fetchnotes ibm-j2re1.5 ibmwc ibmwc-gui ilc libbtctl2 libnotes0 mts-
client skype sun-j2se5.0-jre-binary tacacsclient w32codec
It is possible that one of these packages includes in appropriate files
which trigger
** Description changed:
- This morning I got an update notification saying that new libc6,
- libc6-dev, and libc6-i686 packages were available for upgrade. I
- clicked OK to upgrade them. The upgrade of libc6-dev failed; the
- details from update-manager show:
+ The preinst script in libc6 (and
** Summary changed:
- Edgy security upgrade fails
+ libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
--
libc6 update for Edgy fails due to sanity check
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81125
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
30 matches
Mail list logo
