eol reached https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Changed status of the bug from Incomplette to Confirmed to prevent
expiration.
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Got additional information from Konstantin Ivanov. I'm using package for
architecture i386 while his package is for amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795033
Title:
Regression of p
I see that pmap output provided in #8 shows partially correct result.
Totals are ok, but column Kbytes contains zero in all othre rows. This
was also fixed in my branch:
$ pmap -x $$ | tail -5
b7887000 4 4 4 r ld-2.13.so
b7888000 4 4 4 rw--- ld-2.13.so
bf9
Ubuntu 11.04
pmap -x $$
http://pastebin.com/TCaNPFGd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795033
Title:
Regression of pmap bug 753124
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
I have this bug even on Arch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795033
Title:
Regression of pmap bug 753124
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
Excerpts from Andrey Bondarenko's message of Sat Jun 18 08:03:56 UTC 2011:
> Any news? Will we proceed with merging changes into Ubuntu branches or I
> should forgot about it?
>
Andrey, I'm sorry, I've been busy with some other things. I'll get some
time to work on this next week.
--
You receiv
Any news? Will we proceed with merging changes into Ubuntu branches or I
should forgot about it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795033
Title:
Regression of pmap bug 753124
To manage
I agree, it looks very strange that two "official" builds are different
in fact. I'm using http://de.archive.ubuntu.com:
wget
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/procps/procps_3.2.8-10ubuntu3_i386.deb
md5sum procps_3.2.8-10ubuntu3_i386.deb
779238865cfe4233f48519c68a18cb81 procps_3.2.
Excerpts from Andrey Bondarenko's message of Sat Jun 11 04:13:04 UTC 2011:
> I can tell only about natty. I don't have oneiric environment. The issue
> probably appears because of building package with bzr-buildpackage. Try
>
> bzr branch lp:ubuntu/natty/procps natty
> cd natty
> bzr bd --dont-pur
I can tell only about natty. I don't have oneiric environment. The issue
probably appears because of building package with bzr-buildpackage. Try
bzr branch lp:ubuntu/natty/procps natty
cd natty
bzr bd --dont-purge -- -B -uc -us
cd ../build-area/procps-3.2.8/debian/procps/usr/bin/
./pmap -x $$
See
Andrey, in trying to reproduce the issue before sponsoring your fix, I'm
unable to do it.. on natty and oneiric the output looks right:
# pmap -x $$
5672: -bash
Address Kbytes RSS Dirty Mode Mapping
0040 0 636 0 r-x-- bash
006df000 0
12 matches
Mail list logo