[Bug 789998] Re: Varnish startscript broken in natty

2011-05-30 Thread Joshua Brunner
Oh, my mistake. I had an old /etc/default/varnish Version from lucid without START="Yes". By checking the Startscript, i thought the Problem was also in /etc/init.d/varnish. ** Changed in: varnish (Debian) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: varnish (Ubuntu) Status: New => Inval

[Bug 789998] Re: Varnish startscript broken in natty

2011-05-30 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
":-", in combination with "set -u" in shell scripts, used to allow some variables to be empty. That it looks like a smiley is just an added bonus. Example: $ set -u $ echo ${START} bash: START: unbound variable $ echo ${START:-} $ -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 789998] Re: Varnish startscript broken in natty

2011-05-29 Thread Joshua Brunner
** Also affects: varnish (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789998 Title: Varnish startscript broken in natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 789998] Re: Varnish startscript broken in natty

2011-05-29 Thread Joshua Brunner
** Patch added: "varnish.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789998/+attachment/2147123/+files/varnish.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789998 Title: Varnish startscript br