Launchpad has imported 3 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301002.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://hel
This is fixed in ubuntu artful since 2:4.6.5+dfsg-8ubuntu1 having been
added to debian in 2:4.6.5+dfsg-1.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
Luri, a static avahi service file isn't a great solution since you lose
any of the dynamic Avahi support in Samba, like for the pending
F_FULLSYNC changes: https://github.com/samba-team/samba/pull/64. It
would be best to just enable Avahi support, which is what Debian
apparently did.
--
You recei
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786813
Title:
Enable avahi support in samba
To manage notifications about th
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786813
Title:
Enable avahi support in samba
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786813
Title:
Enable avahi support in samba
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1301002
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301002
** Also affects: samba (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301002
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #859875
http://bu
But avahi is only default for desktop distro.
Samba (SMBD) is more suitable for file server.
I think is better disable avahi and include on samba package a avahi
service file:
Samba Shares on %h
_smb._tcp
139
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hi jwm. Thanks for the suggestion. I don't see why not.. marking
Confirmed/Wishlist. This should probably be forwarded to Debian as well.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug not
