[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2011-03-01 Thread Andreas Moog
Thanks for your report. The package in question is horribly broken and has since been removed from Ubuntu and Debian. Therefor, this bug is being closed. ** Changed in: emifreq-applet (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2009-07-04 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: emifreq-applet (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- 100% CPU Load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com ht

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-09-19 Thread Daniel T Chen
** Changed in: emifreq-applet (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- 100% CPU Load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-06-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: emifreq-applet (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- 100% CPU Load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-06-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #314424 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314424 ** Also affects: emifreq-applet (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314424 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- 100% CPU Load https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-04-04 Thread Adam Niedling
** Changed in: emifreq-applet (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- 100% CPU Load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-04-04 Thread Sven
Just tried it: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install emifreq-applet Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut Reading state information... Fertig Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert: emifreq-applet 0 aktualisiert, 1 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-04-04 Thread Adam Niedling
I tried it.. it won't start a new instance. Let's just close this bug, ok? :) ** Changed in: emifreq-applet (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- 100% CPU Load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-04-03 Thread Sven
Just typed "emifreqd" in the shell. -- 100% CPU Load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-04-03 Thread Adam Niedling
How do you start a second emifreqs? Even if I have 3 emifreqs added to my panel there is only one emifreqd running in my task list. And there is no 100% load when I remove any of them from my panel. -- 100% CPU Load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78622 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-04-01 Thread Sven
Oh, that was long ago... Currently I'm using Ubuntu Hardy (8.04-Beta). I reinstalled it, and found the following glitches: - Close button of "Info" Window does not work - Only seems to support 1 processor I'm only installed it for a quick test and it does not show up the 100% load by itself. But ma

[Bug 78622] Re: 100% CPU Load

2008-03-31 Thread Adam Niedling
What version of Ubuntu are you using? What is the version of your emifreq-applet? Does it consume 100% cpu for longer periods of time? Are you sure that it consumes the cpu time or it only shows that 100% cpu time is being used? Is this an annoying bug as your computer becomes slow? Is this bug sti