** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: linaro-ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: linux-linaro
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
CPU_FREQ is working stable on Q, and it's a 'Won't fix' for the previous
releases since it requires backporting way too much code.
** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: linaro-ubuntu
Milestone: 11.08 => None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784176
Title:
CPU_FREQ support is broken for OMAP 3 and OMAP 4
To manage notifications about
** Changed in: linaro-ubuntu
Milestone: 11.07 => 11.08
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784176
Title:
CPU_FREQ support is broken for OMAP 3 and OMAP 4
To manage notifications about
** Also affects: linaro-ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linaro-ubuntu
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: linaro-ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linaro-ubuntu
Milestone: None => 11.07
--
You received this bug notificatio
will linux-linaro-3.0 have DVFS Framework ? next Libux-linaro next
release will be based on 3.0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784176
Title:
CPU_FREQ support is broken for OMAP 3 a
linux-linaro-2.6.39 does not have DVFS Framework itself. So cpufreq is
not expected to work on 2.6.39 linaro kernel.
I applied this patch against 2.6.38 linaro kernel and I do see that l3
clock is properly scaling when I change mpu frequency via cpufreq sysfs
entries.
Note that bogomips does not
>From Andy:
CPU_FREQ does seem to work / work better at least on linux-linaro-2.6.39
on OMAP4 / Panda.
>From Vishwa:
There was an issue in Clock framework due to which Core DVFS in OMAP3
was not fully functional. This problem is fixed by below commit id in
mainline and same is present in .39 lin
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: linux-linaro
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > The patches applied to Nico's tree have been rejected upstream. They should
> > work for OMAP3, but for OMAP4 it only supports MPU scaling.
> >
> > I've cc'ed Vishwa who is author on some of the p
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Amit Kucheria
<784...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> On 11 May 19, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> amit, is it ok to have CPU_FREQ not working for any of our kernels? any
>> way forward for 11.05 release?
>
> The patches applied to Nico's tree have been rejected upstream. Th
On 11 May 19, Alexander Sack wrote:
> amit, is it ok to have CPU_FREQ not working for any of our kernels? any
> way forward for 11.05 release?
The patches applied to Nico's tree have been rejected upstream. They should
work for OMAP3, but for OMAP4 it only supports MPU scaling.
I've cc'ed Vishwa
amit, is it ok to have CPU_FREQ not working for any of our kernels? any
way forward for 11.05 release?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784176
Title:
CPU_FREQ support is broken for OMAP
13 matches
Mail list logo
