[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 949288 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949288 Missed a '5' off one of the above links. It should be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/596515 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 949288 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949288 It is exactly the same issue. Bug 949288 requests that radeon FB be built into the kernel. The presence of FB_radeon will stop KMS from working (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/59651

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 949288 Build in ATI/radeon framebuffers on PowerPC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779110 Title: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in I

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 949288 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949288 This is not a duplicate of bug #949288. This issue is about suspend failing on PPC hardware, which turns out to be an effect of not having Radeon FB compiled in the kernel; bug #949288 instead is devoted to d

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 949288 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949288 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 949288 Build in ATI/radeon framebuffers on PowerPC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

I too can confirm that Jonathan's suggestion of recompiling with CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y fixes the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779110 Title: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 i

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

Running apport is not appropriate during the execution of this bug, and as running kernels build with CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y has, for the 2 months, removed all evidence of the bug, it is justifiably "confirmed". ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received th

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

** Package changed: linux-meta (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779110 Title: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP To manage notificati

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

If the kernel is built with CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y (vice =m), then suspend works again. So this looks like an Ubuntu regression, even if modular building is what the maintainer desires. -jh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

The thread here and the presence of the following in dmesg [ 26.210182] radeonfb :00:10.0: enabling device (0086 -> 0087) [ 26.210220] radeonfb :00:10.0: BAR 0: can't reserve [mem 0xb800-0xbfff pref] [ 2

[Bug 779110] Re: suspend fails on powerpc > 2.6.38-1 in IOCTL PMU_IOC_SLEEP

Forgot to mention that this is on a standard 11.04 (natty) install --- the 11.10 kernel was added to see if that helped, which it does not. The numeric value for the PMU_IOC_SLEEP ioctl validates against the installed kernel headers. -jh -- You received this bug notification because you are a m