[Bug 758424] Re: missing implementation of i386 syscall 240 (futex)

2015-06-29 Thread Ken Sharp
** Changed in: qemu-linaro Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758424 Title: missing implementation of i386 syscall 240 (futex) To manage notifications

[Bug 758424] Re: missing implementation of i386 syscall 240 (futex)

2014-01-17 Thread Ken Sharp
Cannot recreate in latest git build (1.7.50). Fixed upstream (qemu)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758424 Title: missing implementation of i386 syscall 240 (futex) To manage notific

[Bug 758424] Re: missing implementation of i386 syscall 240 (futex)

2011-10-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: qemu-linaro (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758424 Title:

[Bug 758424] Re: missing implementation of i386 syscall 240 (futex)

2011-04-14 Thread Peter Maydell
We only implement the futex syscalls if CONFIG_USE_NPTL. This isn't defined for the i386 target (the necessary support in target-i386 for pushing atomic insns up to the linux-user top level loop isn't implemented). The upshot is that running multithreaded programs in linux-user i386-target isn't su