** Changed in: qbzr
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: qbzr
Milestone: None => 0.21b1
** Also affects: qbzr/0.20
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: qbzr/trunk
Importance: High
Status: Fix Released
** Changed in: qbzr/0.20
Mileston
** Changed in: qbzr (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742186
Title:
qbzr package should depend on python-configobj
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Gary van der Merwe wrote:
> qbzr <= 0.20 - Uses bzrlib configobj
> qbzr trunk r1356 - Uses python configobj
> qbzr >= trunk r1357 - Uses either python or bzrlib configobj
>
> Danie, you said that the issue was fix by installing python-configobj.
> If I understand e
I'm using the qbzr (and bzr) Ubuntu packages from
http://ppa.launchpad.net/bzr/ppa/ubuntu/
According to /usr/share/doc/qbzr/changelog.gz, it is version "0.20.0 -
2011/02/03".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
qbzr <= 0.20 - Uses bzrlib configobj
qbzr trunk r1356 - Uses python configobj
qbzr >= trunk r1357 - Uses either python or bzrlib configobj
Danie, you said that the issue was fix by installing python-configobj.
If I understand everything correctly, the only way that that was
possible, is if you had
Dear packagers, what can I do to persuade you use my fix for this
problem form the qbzr trunk, to avoid extra patching of qbzr sources? I
can release my fix for all required versions of qbzr, so you can just
packages those versions instead of yours? Is it worth the efforts?
** Changed in: qbzr
** Branch linked: lp:~andrewsomething/ubuntu/maverick/qbzr/lp-742186
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742186
Title:
qbzr package should depend on python-configobj
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
The PPA package of bzr for maverick still includes configobj:
$ head -n 1 debian/changelog
bzr (2.3.1-0~bazaar1~maverick1) maverick; urgency=low
$ ls bzrlib/util/configobj/
configobj.py __init__.py
While the PPA package of qbzr for maverick is patched to us the system
lib:
$ head -n 1 debian/c
Well this certainly doesn't exist in Natty:
$ aptitude why python-configobj
i bzr-explorer Depends bzr (>= 1.14)
i A bzr Depends python-bzrlib (>= 2.3.0-2)
i A python-bzrlib Depends python-configobj
And qbzr is patched to use the system lib.
AFAICT, this is a bug in th
** Changed in: qbzr (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742186
Title:
qbzr package should depend on python-configobj
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
> Though, having said that, configobj does seem to still be present in
python-bzrlib 2.3.1-0~bazaar1~maverick1.
The removal of configobj is reverted in the PPA for <=maverick, because
the packaged python-configobj is too old in these series, and keeping
bzr's embedded copy was simpler than prepari
I think that would still count as a packaging bug, because Ubuntu (and Debian)
have a policy that whenever possible programs should use separately packaged
libraries rather than shipping their own copy.
Though, having said that, configobj does seem to still be present in
python-bzrlib
Actually we've added support to qbzr for being able use configobj either
from bzrlib or from system install, so it's fixed in the upstream but
not released yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Not an upstream bug.
** Project changed: bzr => qbzr
** Changed in: qbzr
Status: New => Invalid
** Also affects: qbzr (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
14 matches
Mail list logo
