FWIW Stretch was released for Linux architectures only, and I doubt
it'll change any time soon. I believe the Debian landscape looked
different when Steve filed this bug in 2011. Nowadays I'm not sure
what's the value of keeping this bug open.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Also affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apparmor
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags added: aa-policy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740510
Title:
multiarch paths in abstractions should not be Linux-specific
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740510
Title:
multiarch paths in abstractions should not be Linux-specific
To manage no
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740510
Title:
multiarch paths in abstractions should not be Linux-specific
--
ubuntu-bu
** Tags added: multiarch-followup
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740510
Title:
multiarch paths in abstractions should not be Linux-specific
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l