finish-install (2.6ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
* Resynchronise with Debian. Remaining changes:
- Handle serial console configuration for upstart.
* Adjust upstart serial console handling for hvc* and hvsi* change (LP:
#72832).
-- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14
** Changed in: finish-install (Debian)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
no console started on cell machine
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72832
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: finish-install (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Committed
--
no console started on cell machine
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72832
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Sure, that's fine, I don't actually care about the speed as such, it's
just that that happens to be part of the finish-install script and I
wanted to check that it worked.
A patch recently went into d-i upstream to fix this anyway (see the
linked bug), so we should get it soon.
** Bug watch added
$ stty --file /dev/hvc0 speed
38400
However, the hvc devices ignore the speed parameter - no handler for
ioctl() is registered.
--
no console started on cell machine
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72832
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
What does 'stty --file /dev/hvc0 speed' say?
** Changed in: finish-install (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
no console started on cell machine
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72832
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
Keybuk: rootskel already spots hvc, but finish-install may not
finish-install is the one that prods init configuration
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: upstart => finish-install
--
no console started on cell machine
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72832
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
Ah, I see; this is pretty similar to the existing server case where we
sometimes add a serial console getty.
I think that's the appropriate way to tackle this here; as we can't tell
on a strictly architecture level whether or not the machine is likely to
have getty-on-VT or getty-on-Serialishness
Correct. There is no VT, only the console on /dev/hvc0 (in fact, my
previous /etc/event.d/ example should do a getty on /dev/hvc0, not
/dev/console).
Rather than having to worry about every possible console configuration,
can the installer set up a /etc/event.d/ file to point to the console
where
To add a bit to that, it should be expected on servers to not have VTs.
I think the server version of distro should be able to deal with that
--
no console started on cell machine
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72832
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Those are cell blades. They don't have a graphic chip and like most IBM
servers, the kernels don't actually need VT support since they don't
actually need any graphic card. They are generally used via serial or HV
console.
--
no console started on cell machine
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72832
--
Err, why aren't there Virtual Terminals on cell machines? There should
at least be tty1 ?
--
no console started on cell machine
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72832
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
12 matches
Mail list logo
