This bug was fixed in the package lvm2 - 2.02.88-2ubuntu1
---
lvm2 (2.02.88-2ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian unstable (LP: #726677), remaining changes:
- debian/patches/avoid-dev-block.patch: Prefer any other device name over
names in /dev/block/ since lv
** Branch linked: lp:~vorlon/ubuntu/precise/lvm2/lp.726677
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726677
Title:
[Wishlist] Upgrade lvm2 to at least 2.02.73
To manage notifications about this
Hey Clint,
any news on this?
I noticed that LVM in precise is still 2.02.66
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726677
Title:
[Wishlist] Upgrade lvm2 to at least 2.02.73
To manage notifi
This merge is a bit of a sticky one due to all of the patches that have
been applied on top of one another in our package, debian's package, and
upstream. I'm moving through it, but slowly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:45:53PM -, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Alasdair, is 2.02.86 also safe these days, or should we be holding back
> on 2.02.84? Debian has updated to 2.02.86 since this bug was filed.
2.02.86 should be OK, but patch it at least with the patch for:
Terminate pv_attr fiel
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726677
Title:
[Wishlist] Upgrade lvm2 to at least 2.02.73
To man
Alasdair, is 2.02.86 also safe these days, or should we be holding back
on 2.02.84? Debian has updated to 2.02.86 since this bug was filed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726677
Title:
2.02.84 is in Debian, so I would expect this one to be fixed by the next
merge. Marking Confirmed/Wishlist.
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
I'm not recommending upgrades to anything other than 2.02.84 at the
moment, due to other issues. So far I regard 2.02.84 as 'stable'. (Add
'Fix to make resuming exclusive cluster mirror use local target type.'
to the release if you want.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726677
Title:
[Wishlist] Upgrade lvm2 to at least 2.02.73
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
10 matches
Mail list logo
