[Bug 71264] Re: patch to get better backtraces

2007-05-24 Thread Sebastien Bacher
closing, we use apport now ** Changed in: bug-buddy (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Rejected -- patch to get better backtraces https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 71264] Re: patch to get better backtraces

2007-02-07 Thread Daniel Holbach
Could this be forwarded upstream? -- patch to get better backtraces https://launchpad.net/bugs/71264 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 71264] Re: patch to get better backtraces

2007-02-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
I spoke with fer (bug-buddy maintainer) about that and pointed him the launchpad page and the patch already, he didn't seem to be convinced by the change though -- patch to get better backtraces https://launchpad.net/bugs/71264 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://li

[Bug 71264] Re: patch to get better backtraces

2006-12-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank for you the patch ** Changed in: bug-buddy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- patch to get better backtraces https://launchpad.net/bugs/71264 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@l

[Bug 71264] Re: patch to get better backtraces

2006-11-10 Thread Ryan Lortie
and then modify /usr/share/bug-buddy/gdb-cmd to read like this: signal SIGTRAP bt thread apply all bt full q ** Attachment added: "foo." http://librarian.launchpad.net/5041870/libgnomeui-crash.patch -- patch to get better backtraces https://launchpad.net/bugs/71264 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing